Corporate Governance and Pyramidal Ownership: The Role of Novo Mercado
Main Article Content
Abstract
The literature has not reached a consensus on the motivation and implications of pyramidal ownership schemes. For some, such arrangements make it easier for controlling shareholders to expropriate outside investors. More recently, some studies have challenged this view and emphasized that their rationale lies in overcoming financial constraints. This paper focuses on whether firms owned through pyramidal schemes are more likely to be listed on the “Novo Mercado,” the Brazilian stock exchange’s premium listing segment created in 2000, which prohibits firms from issuing non-voting shares. We built a dataset of ownership data with annual observations for a panel of firms over the period 2003-2010 by hand-collecting data drawn from reports that firms submit periodically to the Brazilian securities regulator (CVM). Estimating fixed effects non-linear panel data models of a binary dependent variable, we find that firms listed on the Novo Mercado are less likely to be owned through a pyramid arrangement, result which appears to be consistent with the expropriation view.
Article Details
Section
Long Paper
Authors that publish in the Brazilian Review of Finance agree with the following terms:
Authors maintain their moral rights and grant to Review the copyright and the first publication right with their work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License that allows the total or partial copy of the work, including for commercial use, and sharing of the work with recognition of its authors and the initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to take additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the paper published in this journal (eg, in institutional repositories or to publish as a book chapter), with recognition of its authors and the initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
The contents of the signed articles are the sole responsibility of the authors, remains their responsibility even after the transfer of the copyright. The Review reserves the right to make normative, spelling and grammar changes in the original article in order to maintain the linguistic standards, but will follow the style of the authors. RBFin also reserves the right to translate the article into another language. RBFin may impose a copyright transfer form as a condition for publishing the article.
