Gestionando la innovación desde la óptica de los estudios de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad: por una perspectiva constructivista y crítica de la gestión de la innovación
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El presente trabajo elabora una discusión y reflexión teórica sobre la manera en que la gestión de la innovación puede comprenderse e investigarse. Esta discusión se realiza sobre la base del concepto de gestión de la innovación que han definido Dodgson, Gann y Phillips (2013). El texto analiza, en particular, el impacto de la epistemología y comprensión del mundo que se presentan en la literatura de la gestión de la innovación, utilizando para ello la óptica de un estudio constructivista –Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad– y crítico de la misma. El análisis muestra la posibilidad abrir nuevos rumbos para la gestión de la innovación. Como resultado, se muestra la necesidad de comprender performativamente, reflexivamente el fenómeno de la gestión de la innovación, operación que conlleva la necesaria agrupación entre el capital y el trabajo para una comprensión cabal de la gestión de la innovación.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
AKRICH, M.; CALLON, M.; LATOUR, B. The key to success in innovation Part I: the art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 6, n. 2, p. 187-206, 2002.
AKRICH, M.; LATOUR, B. A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In: BIJKER, W.; LAW, J. (Orgs.). Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
ALVESSON, M.; WILLMOTT, H. Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction, Critical Theory and Management Practice. London: Sage, 2012.
ASHMORE, M. Ending up on the Wrong Side: Must the Two Forms of Radicalism Always be at War?. Social Studies of Science, v. 26, n. 2, p. 305-322, 1996.
BIJKER, W. How is technology made? — That is the question!. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, n. 1, p. 63-76, 2010.
BOWKER, G.; STAR, S. L. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences (inside technology). Boston: MIT Press, 1999.
BROWN, T. Change by design. Boston: Harper Collins Publishers, 2009.
BIRKINSHAW, J.; HAMEL, G.; MOL, M. J. Management innovation. Academy of management Review, v. 33, n. 4, p. 825-845, 2008.
ÇALISKAN, K.; CALLON, M. Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-32, 2010.
CALLON, M. Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: from prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In: PINCH, T.; SWEDBERS, R. (Org.). Living in a material world: economic sociology meets science and technology studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.
CALLON, M.; LATOUR, B. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! a reply to collins and yearley. In: PICKERING, A. (Org.). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
CABANTOUS, L.; GOND, J-P. Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality's Éternel Retour. Organization science, v. 22, n. 3, p. 573-586, 2011.
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2003.
CHESBROUGH, H.; VANHAVERBEKE, W.; WEST, J. (Ed.). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M. The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
GASPARIN, M.; NEYLAND, D. We have always been modern (ist): temporality and the organisational management of ‘timeless’ iconic chairs. Organization, v. 25, n. 3, p. 354-373, 2017.
CHRISTIANSEN, J.; VARNES, C. Making decisions on innovation: meetings or networks?. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 16, n. 3, p. 282-298, 2007.
COHEN, W.; LEVINTHAL, D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quaterly, v. 35. n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.
CONWAY, S.; STEWARD, F. Managing and shaping innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
DODGSON, M. Innovation management: a research overview. London: Routledge, 2017.
DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; SALTER, A. The management of technological innovation: strategy and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; PHILLIPS, N. Perspectives on innovation management. In: DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; PHILLIPS, N. (Orgs.). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
EKBIA, H.; NARDI, B. Inverse instrumentality: how technologies objectify patients and players. In: LEONARDI, P.; KALLINIKOS, J. (Orgs.). Materiality and organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
FAGERBERG, J.; FOSAAS, M.; SAPPRASERT, K. Innovation: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, v. 41, n. 7, p. 1132-1153, 2012.
FAGERBERG, J.; Mowery, D.; Nelson, R. (Orgs.). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
GOND, J-P.; CABANTOUS, L.; HARDING, N.; LEARMONTH, M. What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 18, n. 4, p. 440-463, 2016.
HULL, R.; KAGHAN, W. Editorial: innovation-but for whose benefit, for what purpose?. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 12, n. 3, p. 317-325, 2000.
JENSEN, C. Sorting attachments: usefulness of sts in healthcare practice and policy. Science as Culture, v. 16, n. 3, p. 237-251, 2007.
JOHANSSON, U.; WOODILLA, J. Towards an epistemological merger of design thinking, strategy and innovation. In: EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DESIGN CONFERENCE, 8., 2009, Aberdeen. Anais… Aberdeen: The Robert Gordon University, 2009. Disponible en: <http://www.designfakulteten.kth.se/sites/default/files/1.44194TOWARDS_AN_EPISTEMOLOGICAL_MERGER_OF_DESIGN_THINKING_STRATEGY_AND_INNOVATION_JW.pdf>. Acceso el: 16 ago. 2018.
KAGHAN, W. Invention, innovation, and emancipation: research worlds and trajectories of social change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 12, n. 3, p. 343-347, 2000.
KAGHAN, W. Beyond the panopticon? Technology, organizing, and forms of resistance. In: INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL MANAGEMENT STUDIES CONFERENCE, 4., 2005, Cambridge. Anais… Cambridge: Uversity of Cambridge, 2005. Disponible en: <http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2005/proceedings/technology/Kaghan.pdf>. Acceso el: 16 ago. 2018.
KNORR-CETINA, K.; MULKAY, M. Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage, 1983.
KORNBERGER, M.; CLEGG, S. Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organization, v. 9, n. 2, p. 136-162, 2011.
LAM, A. Organizational Innovation. In: FAGERBERG, J.; MOWERY, D.; NELSON, R. R. (Orgs.). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
LATOUR, B.Visualization and cognition. Knowledge and Society, v. 6, p. 1-40, 1986.
LATOUR, B. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
LATOUR, B. On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, v. 3, n. 4, p. 228-245, 1996.
LATOUR, B. From the world of science to the world of research?. Science, v. 280, n. 5361, p. 208-209, 1998.
LATOUR, B. La esperanza de Pandora: ensayos sobre la realidad de los estudios de la ciencia. Madrid: Gedisa Editorial, 2001.
LAW, J. After method: mess in social science research. London: Routledge, 2004.
LAW, J.; SINGLETON, V. Performing technology’s stories: on social constructivism, performance and performativity. Technology and Culture, v. 41, n. 4, p. 765-775, 2000.
LEÓN, F.¿Son los obreros idiotas e irracionales?. Convergencia, v. 17, n. 53, p. 253-283, 2010.
MACKAY, H. et al. Reconfiguring the user: using rapid application development. Social Studies of Science, v. 30, n. 5, p. 737-759, 2000.
MACKENZIE, D. An engine, not a camera: how financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2006.
MARCH, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.
Marx, K. The Marx-Engels reader. New York: Norton, 1972.
OCDE. Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. France: OECD publishing, 2005.
OSTERWALDER, A.; PIGNEUR, Y.; TUCCI, C. Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, v. 16, n. 1, 2005. 1 p.
PARMAR, B.; PHILLIPS, R.; FREEMAN, E. Pragmatism and organization studies. In: MIR, R.; WILLMOTT, H.; GREENWOOD, M. (Orgs.). The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies. New York: Routledge, 2016.
PHILLIPS, J. Agencement/assemblage. Theory Culture and Society, v. 23, n. 2-3, p. 108, 2006.
PICKERING, A. The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
PISANO, G. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 8, p. 1122-1130, 2006.
POLLOCK, N.; D’ADDERIO, L. Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 37, n. 8, p. 565-586, 2012.
POMEROY, A. Marx and Whitehead: process, dialectics, and the critique of capitalism. Albany: SUNY, 2004.
PORTER, M. 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.
RYLANDER, A. Design thinking as knowledge work: Epistemological foundations and practical implications. Design Management Journal, v. 4, n. 1, p. 7-19, 2009.
SALTER, A.; ALEXY, O. The nature of innovation. In: DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; PHILLIPS, N. (Orgs.). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
SERRES, M. The parasite. Baltimore: John Hopkins University, 2006.
SPOELSTRA, S. Robert Cooper? Beyond organization. The Sociological Review, v. 53, n. s/i 1, p. 106-119, 2005.
STENNER, P. A. N. Whitehead and Subjectivity. Subjectivity, v. 22, n. 1, p. 90-109, 2008.
SUCHMAN, L. Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
SUMMERTON, J. Do electrons have politics? Constructing user identities in Swedish electricity. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 29, n. 4, p. 486-511, 2004.
TEECE, D. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, v. 15, n. 6, p. 286-305, 1986.
TEECE, D. Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 8, p. 1131-1146, 2006.
TEECE, D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, v. 28. n. 13, p. 1319-1350, 2007.
TEECE, D. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range planning, v.43, n.2-3, p. 172-194, 2010.
TEECE, D. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, v. 51, n. 1, p. 40-49, 2017.
TEECE, D.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509-533, 1997.
TETHER, B. S. Services, innovation, and managing service innovation. In: DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; PHILLIPS, N. (Orgs). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
VON HIPPEL, E. Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan management review, v. 42, n. 4, p. 82-86, 2001.
VON HIPPEL, E. Democratizing innovation. Boston: MIT press, 2005.
WHITEHEAD, A. N. Process and reality: an essay in cosmology. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
WHITTLE, A.; SPICER, A. Is actor network theory critique?. Organization Studies, v. 29, n. 4, p. 611-629, 2008.
WOOLGAR, S. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In: LAW, J. (Org.). A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge, 1991.
WOOLGAR, S. The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 16, n. 1, p. 20-50, 1991.