El impacto de los diferentes tipos de innovación y el apoyo del gobierno en el desempeño de las empresas: el caso de las PyME manufactureras de Europa Central y Oriental

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF (Português (Brasil)) PDF (English)
Publicado: jul 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174365
Palabras clave:
Desempeño de innovación. Apoyo gubernamental. Desempeño financeiro. ECO. Antiguas repúblicas soviéticas europeas.

Contenido principal del artículo

Fábio de Oliveira Paula
PUC-Rio
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-2241
Jorge Ferreira da Silva
PUC-Rio

Resumen

Este estudio investigó la importancia de las alianzas con el Gobierno para el desarrollo de los cuatro tipos de innovación (producto, proceso, organizacional y marketing) en empresas de dos grupos diferentes de países de Europa Central y Oriental (ECO), incluyendo las antiguas repúblicas soviéticas europeas (países miembros de la Unión Europea –UE, y países no miembros de la UE); y cómo cada tipo de innovación afecta el desempeño financiero de las empresas. Para alcanzar esta meta, se probó una muestra de 1.143 PyME manufactureras del Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS) utilizando regresión múltiple y logit. Con base en la teoría de la capacidad de absorción, se encontró que las PyME manufactureras de países de la UE tienen una mayor capacidad de absorción y se benefician de los programas de promoción de la innovación de la UE para innovar. Por otro lado, las empresas de los países no miembros de la UE perciben un efecto más rápido de las innovaciones en el desempeño financiero, ya que existe una brecha tecnológica entre los dos grupos, y los países no miembros de la UE son menos desarrollados. Además, la introducción de diferentes tipos de innovaciones simultáneamente puede mejorar el rendimiento de las empresas de países no miembros de la UE a corto plazo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Paula, F. de O., & Silva, J. F. da. (2019). El impacto de los diferentes tipos de innovación y el apoyo del gobierno en el desempeño de las empresas: el caso de las PyME manufactureras de Europa Central y Oriental. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(4), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174365
Número
Vol. 17 Núm. 4 (2019) - Innovación en organizaciones de economía emergentes
Sección
Artículos
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:

  • Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
  • Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
  • Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Citas

APANASOVICH, N.; HERAS, H. A.; PARRILLI, M. D. The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: the case of Belarus. Technovation, v. 57-58, p. 30-40, 2016.

ASLUND, A. Transition in perspective: 25 years after the fall of communism. 2017. Disponível em: <https://piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-issues-watch/transition-perspective-25-years-after-fall-communism?p=4312>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2017.

ATELJEVIĆ, J.; TRIVIĆ, J. (Eds.). Economic development and entrepreneurship in transition economies: issues, obstacles and perspectives. Basingstoke: Springer, 2016.

BELL, M.; FIGUEIREDO, P. N. Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implications for research. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, v. 33, n. 1, p. 14-40, 2012.

CAMISÓN, C.; VILLAR-LÓPEZ, A. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, v. 67, n. 1, p. 2891-2902, 2014.

CASSIMAN, B.; GOLOVKO, E. Innovation and internationalization through exports. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 42, n. 1, p. 56-75, 2011.

CHESBROUGH, H. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2/3, p. 354-363, 2010.

CHOUNG, J. Y.; HWANG, H. R.; SONG, W. Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea. World Development, v. 54, p. 156-167, 2014.

CHRISTENSEN, C.; RAYNOR, M. The innovator's solution: creating and sustaining successful growth. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.

COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.

DUTTA, S.; LANVIN, B.; WUNSCH-VINCENT, S. (Eds.). The Global Innovation Index 2016: winning with global innovation. Cornell University, INSEAD, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva, 2016.

DU, J.; LETEN, B.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 5, p. 828-840, 2014.

EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT – EBRD. Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS). 2016. Disponível em: <http://ebrd-beeps.com/>. Acesso em: 25 out. 2016.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION – EC. European neighborhood policy and enlargement negotiations. 2017a. Disponível em: <https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/conditions-membership/chapters-of-the-acquis_en>. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2017.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION – EC. What is an SME? 2017b. Disponível em: <http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/sme-definition_en>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2017.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION – EC. Funding for Innovation. 2017c. Disponível em: <https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/funding_en>. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2017.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION – EC. Innovation Policies. 2018. Disponível em: <https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/policy_en>. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2017.

FEIGE, E. L. The transition to a market economy in Russia: property rights, mass privatization and stabilization. A fourth way, p. 57-78, 1994.

GALINDO, M. Á.; MÉNDEZ, M. T. Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, v. 67, n. 5, p. 825-829, 2014.

GHAZALIAN, P. L.; FAKIH, A. R&D and innovation in food processing firms in transition countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 68, n. 2, p. 427-450, 2017.

GRIFFITH, R. et al. Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 22, n. 4, p. 483-498, 2006.

GUPTA, S. et al. Marketing innovation: a consequence of competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 12, p. 5671-5681, 2016.

HAMEL, G. Management innovation. Leadership Excellence, v. 26, n. 5, 2009.

HAMEL, G.; VALIKANGAS, L. The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, v. 81, n. 9, p. 52-65, 2003.

HILL, C.; ROTHAERMEL, F. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 257-274, 2003.

HONG, J.et al. Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries? Technovation, v. 57-58, p. 4-13, 2016.

KIM, L. Imitation to innovation: the dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press, 1997.

KIM, L. Crisis Construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, v. 9, n. 4, p. 506-521, 1998.

LAFORET, S. Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: effects of age, size, and sector. Journal of World Business, v. 48, n. 4, p. 490-502, 2013.

LEE, K.; LIM, C. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 459-483, 2001.

MARCH, J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.

MOUTINHO, R.; AU-YONG-OLIVEIRA, M.; COELHO, A.; MANSO, J. P. The role of regional innovation systems (RIS) in translating R&D investments into economic and employment growth. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 10, n. 2, p. 9-23, 2015.

NELSON, R. R.; MOWERY, D. C.; FAGERBERG, J. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPORATION AND DEVELOPMENT – OECD. Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD, 2005.

PATEL, P.; PAVITT, K. The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. STI review, v. 14, n. 1, p. 9-32, 1994.

PAULA, F. D. O.; SILVA, J. F. D. Balancing Internal and External R&D Strategies to Improve Innovation and Financial Performance. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, v. 15, n. 2, 2018.

PODSAKOFF, P. M.et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88, n. 5, p. 879-903, 2003.

PROPRIS, L. Types of innovation and inter-firm co-operation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, v. 14, n. 4, p. 337-353, 2002.

RADOSEVIC, S. Innovation policies in central and eastern European countries: are they meeting the challenges of knowledge-based growth in enlarged EU? In: JASINSKI, A. (Ed.). Transition economies in the European research and innovation area: new challenges for their science and technology. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2004. p. 95-114.

SCHOENMAKERS, W.; DUYSTERS, G. The technological origins of radical inventions. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 8, p. 1051-1059, 2010.

TEECE, D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, v. 15, n. 6, p. 285-305, 1986.

TEECE, D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 3, p. 1319-1350, 2007.

TERJESEN, S.; PATEL, P. C. In search of process innovations: The role of search depth, search breadth, and the industry environment. Journal of Management, v. 43, n. 5, p. 1421-1446, 2017.

TOMLINSON, P. Co-operative ties and innovation: some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 6, p. 762-775, 2010.

UNITED NATIONS – UN. Human Development Report 2015. 2015. Disponível em: <http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2015_statistical_annex.pdf>. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2017.

UTTERBACK, J. M.; ABERNATHY, W. J. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, v. 3, n. 6, p. 639-656, 1975.

VEGA-JURADO, J. et al. Integrating Technology , Management and Marketing Innovation through Open Innovation Models, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation v. 10, n. 4, p. 85-90, 2015.

YAMAKAWA, Y.; YANG, H.; LIN, J. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, v. 40, n. 2, p. 287-296, 2011.

ZAHRA, S. A.; GEORGE, G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 2, p. 185-203, 2002.

ZENG, S. X.; XIE, X. M.; TAM, C. M. Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, v. 30, n. 3, p. 181-194, 2010.