Perspectivas decolonizadoras e pluriversalidade decolonial na prática e na pesquisa em administração: introdução à edição especial

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Michelle Mielly
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-5334
Gazi Islam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-6018
Ana Maria Peredo
Penelope Muzanenhamo
Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-7859
Sandiso Bazana
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5177-2567

Resumo

Perspectivas decoloniais e pluriversais têm aparecido com cada vez mais frequência nos estudos organizacionais, desafiando paradigmas de conhecimento ocidentais e eurocêntricos predominantes no campo da gestão. Os artigos desta edição especial oferecem uma crítica e também alternativas às perspectivas hegemônicas, colocando em primeiro plano novas possibilidades que consideram as múltiplas formas de se conhecer e organizar, particularmente aquelas originadas em comunidades menos visíveis, marginalizadas, indígenas ou minoritárias. Os estudos apresentados aqui questionam normas eurocêntricas arraigadas na teoria da gestão, privilegiando novas perspectivas que abrangem três conceitos centrais e comuns entrelaçados na questão: hibridismo, alteridade e afirmatividade. Esses temas são bastante abrangentes e refletem um compromisso em reconhecer e integrar diversas tradições epistêmicas, seguindo a noção de pluriversalidade de forma a resistir a interpretações simplistas ou monolíticas de práticas de organização humana. Tal compromisso requer a defesa de práticas editoriais mais inclusivas além das normas tradicionais para reconhecer as barreiras impostas por veículos e padrões de publicação de domínio inglês. O conjunto de artigos publicados nesta edição faz uma exploração interdisciplinar da prática e da teoria decoloniais ao mesmo tempo que demonstra um impulso específico para diversificar e pluralizar o campo dos estudos organizacionais. O envolvimento de vozes globalmente marginalizadas em todos os contextos e formas organizacionais contribui na promoção de meios reflexivos e inclusivos de desafiar práticas hegemônicas dentro da própria academia e, finalmente, encorajar acadêmicos organizacionais a adotar estruturas decoloniais capazes de criticar e renovar práticas de gestão em todo o mundo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Mielly, M., Islam, G., Peredo, A. M., Muzanenhamo, P., Irigaray, H. A. R., & Bazana, S. (2024). Perspectivas decolonizadoras e pluriversalidade decolonial na prática e na pesquisa em administração: introdução à edição especial. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 22(6), e2024–0172. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120240172
Seção
Apresentação

Referências

Abdelnour, S. (2023). Making a killing: Israel’s military-innovation ecosystem and the globalization of violence. Organization Studies, 44(2), 333-337.

Alcadipani, R., & Faria, A. (2014). Fighting Latin American marginality in “international” business. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 10(1/2), 107-117.

Banerjee, S., & Tedmanson, D. (2010). Grass burning under our feet: Indigenous enterprise development in a political economy of whiteness. Management Learning, 41(2), 147-165.

Barros, A., & Alcadipani, R. (2023). Decolonizing journals in management and organizations? Epistemological colonial encounters and the double translation. Management Learning, 54(4), 576-586.

Bastien, F., Coraiola, D. M., & Foster, W. M. (2023). Indigenous peoples and organization studies. Organization Studies, 44(4), 659-675.

Bernardino-Costa, J., Maldonado-Torres, N., & Grosfoguel, R. (2018). Decolonialidade e Pensamento Afrodiaspórico. Autêntica Editora.

Bhabha, H. (1984, Spring). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. October, 28, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.2307/778467

Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Bristow, A. (2021). What was, is and will be critical about journal publishing? Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organizations, 21(4), 23-55.

Boussebaa, M., & Brown, A. D. (2017). Englishization, identity regulation and imperialism. Organization studies, 38(1), 7-29.

Byers, D., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Ethics, alterity, and organizational justice. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 239-250.

Castro-Gómez, S. (2006). Zero-Point Hubris: Science, Race, and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Latin America. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Chakrabarty, D. (1992). Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the critique of history. Cultural studies, 6(3), 337-357

Chowdhury, R. (2023). Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(3), 553-570.

Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2015). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Routledge.

Cooper, F. (1997). The Dialectics of Decolonization: Nationalism and Labor Movements in Postwar French Africa. In F. Cooper, & A. Stoler (Eds.), Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World (pp. 406-435). University of California Press.

Cooper, F. (2005). Colonialism in question: Theory, knowledge, history. University of California Press.

Couto, F. F., Honorato, B. E. de F., & Carrieri, A. de P. (2021). The decolonizing future of organization studies. Ephemera, 21(4), 57-88.

Daher, S. (2024). Organizing at the End of the World: Ontological Perspectivism as an Approach to Ecological Crises. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 16826. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.14bp

Davidson, M. (2021). Anthropology and the ‘crisis of Marxism’ (Doctoral Dissertation). School of Politics and International Relations Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.

Dar, S., Liu, H., Martinez Dy, A., & Brewis, D. N. (2021). The business school is racist: Act up! Organization, 28(4), 695-706.

De Toro, F. (1999). The postcolonial question: Alterity, identity, and the other(s). In A. De Toro, & F. De Toro (Eds.), El debate de la postcolonialidad en Latinoamérica: Una postmodernidad periférica o cambio de paradigma en el pensamiento latinoamericano (pp. 101-136). Iberoamericana Editorial Vervuert.

Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R., Bradford, T. W., Dobscha, S., Ger, G., & Varman, R. (2022). Decolonizing marketing. Consumption Markets & Culture, 25(2), 176-186.

Ergene, S., & Calás, M. B. (2023). Becoming naturecultural: Rethinking sustainability for a more-than-human world. Organization Studies, 44(12), 1961-1986.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.

Evaristo, C. (2017). Becos da memória. Pallas Editora.

Faria, A. (2024). Reaprendendo a decolonizar (cada vez) mais e recolonizar (cada vez) menos dentro e fora da academia e da organização. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 22(6), e2023-0060.

Glissant, E. (1995). Introduction à une Poétique du Divers. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.

Glissant, E. (2008). Une nouvelle région du monde (Vol. 1: Esthétique). University of Michigan.

Golden, A., Kulbrandstad, L. A., & Zhang, L. J. (Eds.). (2021). Crossing borders, writing texts, being evaluated: Cultural and disciplinary norms in academic writing (Vol. 97). Multilingual Matters.

Gordon, J. A., Guru, G., Sarukkai, S., Jensen, K. E., & Perina, M. L. (2020). Creolizing the Canon: Philosophy and Decolonial Democratization? Journal of World Philosophies, 5(2), 94-138.

Gordon, L. (2021). Freedom, justice, and decolonization. Routledge.

Gotsis, G., Kortezi, Z., Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2015). Operationalizing critical diversity theories: a contextual framework of implementing new diversity practices. In George G., & Z. Kortezi (Eds.), Critical Studies in Diversity Management Literature: A Review and Synthesis (pp. 69-98). Springer.

Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 211-223.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Duke University Press.

Islam, G. (2012). Can the subaltern eat? Anthropophagic culture as a Brazilian lens on post-colonial theory. Organization, 19(2), 159-180.

Kaasila-Pakanen, A. L. (2023). Thinking through encounters: postcolonial essays on difference and otherness in organization studies (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oulu Graduate School, Oulu Business School, Oulu, Finland.

Maragni, F. T. G., Costa, A. C. O. R., Campos, N. M., & Casa Nova, S. P. de C. (2024). Poder de Escolha: uma práxis decolonial para a ressignificação do espaço universitário. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 22(6), e2023-0064.

Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonization. Columbia University Press.

Mbembe, A. (2016). Decolonizing the university: new directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1), 29-45.

Mielly, M., & Peticca-Harris, A. (2022). Local worker perspectives from Nicaraguan surf tourism: revisiting career anchors in non-standard work contexts. Career Development International, 27(2), 245-259.

Mignolo, W.D. (2018). On pluriversality and multipolar world order: Decoloniality after decolonization; dewesternization after the cold war. In B. Reiter (Ed.), Constructing the pluriverse (pp. 90-116). Duke University Press.

Mignolo, W., & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press.

Mir, R., & Mir, A. (2013). The colony writes back: Organization as an early champion of non-Western organizational theory. Organization, 20(1), 91-101.

Murdoch, H. A. (2023). Creolization, Hybridity and Archipelagic Thinking: Interrogating Inscriptions of Postcolonial Agency. The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 10(1), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2022.33’

Murphy, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization, 19(6), 915-927

Muzanenhamo P., & Chowdhury R. (2021). Epistemic injustice and hegemonic ordeal in management and organization studies: Advancing Black scholarship. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211014802

Nkomo, S. M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of 'African' leadership and management in organization studies: tensions, contradictions, and possibilities. Organization, 18(3), 365-386.

Nkomo, S. M. (2019). The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting “race in organizations”. In Postmodern Management Theory (pp. 463-489). Routledge.

Pal, M., Cruz, J., & Munshi, D. (Eds.). (2023). Organizing at the Margins: Theorizing Organizations of Struggle in the Global South. Springer Nature.

Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2010). Indigenous development and the cultural captivity of entrepreneurship. Business & Society, 52(4), 592-620.

Peredo, A. M. (2023). The unsettling potential of Indigenous organizing. Organization, 30(6), 1211-1221.

Prasad, A. (2015). Toward decolonizing modern Western structures of knowledge: A postcolonial interrogation of (Critical) Management Studies. In A. Prasad, P. Prasad, A. Mills, & J. H. Mills (Eds.), The Routledge companion to critical management studies (pp. 161-199). Routledge.

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168-178.

Silva, C. M. D., Sauerbronn, F. F., & Thiollent, M. (2022). Decolonial studies, non-extractive methods, and participatory action research in Accounting. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(04), e210014.

Spiller, C., Maunganui Wolfgramm, R., Henry, E., & Pouwhare, R. (2020). Paradigm warriors: Advancing a radical ecosystems view of collective leadership from an Indigenous Māori perspective.

Spivak, G. (1990). The post‐colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. Routledge.

Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. University of California Press.

Van Buren III, H. J., Karam, C., & Afiouni, F. (2024). Producing actionable knowledge about marginalized populations and communities: a challenge to editors and journals. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 43(2), 300-312.

Yousfi, H. (2021). International management, should we abandon the myth of cultural Hybridity? A re-examination of the contribution of postcolonial and decolonial approaches. M@n@gement, 24(1), 80-89.