Narrativa mediática sobre los beneficios e impactos de la producción de hidrógeno verde: exploración de cuestiones ambientales y sociales

Contenido principal del artículo

Felipe Moura Oliveira
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-6827
Thiago Costa Holanda
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-6673
Luís Matheus Tavares Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-824X
Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-5604

Resumen

El artículo analiza la narrativa de los medios brasileños en la comunicación sobre la producción de hidrógeno verde en portales de noticias. Se adoptó la metodología de minería de texto en Google Noticias, utilizando el término “hidrógeno verde”, para realizar el análisis de las
publicaciones mediante el uso del software Voyant Tools. Los resultados evidenciaron el potencial de Brasil para la producción de hidrogeno verde y destacaron las inversiones destinadas a la instalación del hub de hidrógeno verde en el estado de Ceará. Sin embargo, los médios no informaron a la sociedad sobre los posibles impactos ambientales y sociales de dicha producción. El enfoque selectivo en la cobertura noticiosa no proporciona una comprensión integral de los desafíos asociados a una transición energética justa y refuerza el poder de los medios en la construcción de un discurso desarrollista idealizado, exento de impactos ambientales y sociales.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Oliveira, F. M., Holanda, T. C., Silva, L. M. T., & de Abreu, M. C. S. (2025). Narrativa mediática sobre los beneficios e impactos de la producción de hidrógeno verde: exploración de cuestiones ambientales y sociales. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 23(2), e2024–0043. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120240043
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Abreu, M. C. S., Webb, K., Araújo, F. S. M., & Cavalcante, J. P. L. (2021). From “business as usual” to tackling climate change: Exploring factors affecting low-carbon decision-making in the Canadian oil and gas sector. Energy Policy, 148, 111932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111932

Akhtar, M. S., Khan, H., Liu, J. J., & Na, J. (2023). Green hydrogen and sustainable development: A social LCA perspective highlighting social hotspots and geopolitical implications of the future hydrogen economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 395, 136438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136438

Alhudithi, E. (2021). Review of Voyant Tools: See through your text. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 43–50. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73446

Almaraz, S. D. L., Kocsis, T., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Szántó, Z. O. (2024). Identifying social aspects related to the hydrogen economy: Review, synthesis, and research perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 49, 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.043

Arup. (2022). Water for Hydrogen. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water Australian Hydrogen Council. Recovered at April 16, 2025 from https://h2council.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/221114-Arup-Technical-paper-Water-for-Hydrogen-report-FINAL.pdf

Becker, H., Murawski, J., Shinde, D. V., Stephens, I. E. L., Hinds, G., & Smith, G. (2023). Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: A review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 7(7), 1565–1603. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2se01517j

Berry, M. W. (2004). Survey of text mining: Clustering, Classification, and Retrieval. Springer.

Blohm, M., & Dettner, F. (2023). Green hydrogen production: Integrating environmental and social criteria to ensure sustainability. Smart Energy, 11, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2023.100112

Bøgelund, P. (2007). Making green discourses matter in policy-making: Learning from discursive power struggles within the policy area of car taxation. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.023

Cao, J., Faff, R., He, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Who’s Greenwashing Via the Media and What are the Consequences? Evidence From China. Abacus, 58(4), 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12273

Cheng, W., & Lee, S. (2022). How Green Are the National Hydrogen Strategies? Sustainability, 14(3), 1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031930

Cidell, J. (2010). Content clouds as exploratory qualitative data analysis. Area, 42(4), 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.201 0.00952.x

Clarke, C. E., & Evensen, D. T. N. (2023). Attention to news media coverage of unconventional oil/gas development impacts: Exploring psychological antecedents and effects on issue support. Energy Policy, 173(1), 113355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113355

Cromm, C. (2024). Speaking the Right Language: Transnational Rule and Symbolic Power in Dialogue Forums. Global Society, 38(3), 388–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2024.2305415

Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2021). Media Control and Post-Truth Communication. In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (1st Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569-29

Delpierre, M., Quist, J., Mertens, J., Prieur-Vernat, A., & Cucurachi, S. (2021). Assessing the environmental impacts of wind-based hydrogen production in the Netherlands using ex-ante LCA and scenarios analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 299, 126866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126866

Dillman, K., & Heinonen, J. (2023). Towards a Safe Hydrogen Economy: An Absolute Climate Sustainability Assessment of Hydrogen Production. Climate, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11010025

Dirlik, A. (2012). Developmentalism: A critique. Interventions, 16(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2012.735807

Dragomir, M. (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep the media in line. Journalism, 19(8), 1131–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724621

Edouihri, A. (2024). The Discursive Power of Persuasion in Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of King Mohamed VI’s Speeches. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.1.9

Emodi, N. V., Lovell, H., Levitt, C., & Franklin, E. (2021). A systematic literature review of societal acceptance and stakeholders’ perception of hydrogen technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(60), 30669–30697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.212

Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AI Magazine, 17(3), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v17i3.1230

Ferreira, R. R. (2024). The Precarity Trap: Modelling Non-Democratic Journalistic Practices Beyond Media Capture. Journalism Studies, 25(6), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2322635

Fonseca, R. G. (2022). A era do hidrogênio verde no século XXI. Revista Inovação e Desenvolvimento, 1(8), 40–45. https://revistainovacao.facepe.br/index.php/revistaFacepe/article/view/87

Fournier-Viger, P., Cheng, C., Cheng, Z., Chun-Wei Lin, J., & Selmaoui-Folcher, N. (2019). Mining significant trend sequences in dynamic attributed graphs. 182, 104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.06.005

Galparsoro, I., Menchaca, I., Garmendia, J. M., Borja, Á., Maldonado, A. D., Iglesias, G., & Bald, J. (2022). Reviewing the ecological impacts of offshore wind farms. Npj Ocean Sustainability, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-022-00003-5

Garlet, T. B., Savian, F. S., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Siluk, J. C. M. (2024). Unlocking Brazil’s green hydrogen potential: Overcoming barriers and formulating strategies to this promising sector. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 49, 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.227

Gomes, P. H., Pereira, S. P., Tavares, T. C. L., Garcia, T. M., & Soares, M. O. (2023). Impacts of desalination discharges on phytoplankton and zooplankton: Perspectives on current knowledge. Science of the Total Environment, 863(1), 160671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160671

Gorayeb, A., Brannstrom, C., Meireles, A. J. A., & Mendes, J. S. (2018). Wind power gone bad: Critiquing wind power planning processes in northeastern Brazil. Energy Research and Social Science, 40, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.027

Gorayeb, A., Brannstrom, C., Xavier, T., Soares, M. O., Teixeira, C. E. P., Santos, A. M. F., & Carvalho, R. G. (2024). Emerging challenges of offshore wind energy in the Global South: Perspectives from Brazil. Energy Research and Social Science, 113, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103542

Gorayeb, A., Mendes, J. S., Meireles, A. J. A., Brannstrom, C., Silva, E. V., & Freitas, A. L. R. (2016). Wind-energy development causes social impacts in coastal ceará state, Brazil: The case of the Xavier community. Journal of Coastal Research, 1(75), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI75-077.1

Hanusch, F., & Schad, M. (2021). Hydrogen research: Technology first, society second? GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.30.2.5

Hjarvard, S. (2018). The Logics of the Media and the mediatized conditions of social interaction. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pflock (Eds.), Media Logic(s) Revisited, Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research (pp. 82–104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1

Homero Junior, P. F., & Carrieri, A. P. (2020). Desenvolvimento sustentável e trabalho precário no relato integrado da Natura: pensando um contrarrelato. Organizações & Sociedade, 27(93), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9270932

Hotho, A., Nürnberger, A., & Paaß, G. (2005). A Brief Survey of Text Mining. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 20(1), 19–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.20.2005.68

Inocêncio, E. R., & Favoreto, R. L. (2022). Distorções comunicativas em relatórios de sustentabilidade: uma análise pautada no pensamento habermasiano. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 20(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120210171

Jones, E., Qadir, M., Vliet, M. T. H. V., Smakhtin, V., & Kang, S. M. (2019). The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076

Jungherr, A., Posegga, O., & An, J. (2019). Discursive Power in Contemporary Media Systems: A Comparative Framework. International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219841543

Kalogeropoulos, A., Toff, B., & Fletcher, R. (2024). The Watchdog Press in the Doghouse: A Comparative Study of Attitudes about Accountability Journalism, Trust in News, and News Avoidance. International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221112572

Kalt, T., & Tunn, J. (2022). Shipping the sunshine? A critical research agenda on the global hydrogen transition. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.31.2.2

Karakislak, I., Hildebrand, J., & Schweizer-Ries, P. (2021). Exploring the interaction between social norms and perceived justice of wind energy projects: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 25(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2020631

Lara, L. G. A., & Oliveira, S. A. (2017). A ideologia do crescimento econômico e o discurso empresarial do desenvolvimento sustentável. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 15(2), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395159387

Liu, L., Liu, P., Yu, J., Feng, G., Zhang, Q., & Svenning, J. C. (2024). Wind farms increase land surface temperature and reduce vegetation productivity in the Inner Mongolia. Geography and Sustainability, 5(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.007

Mack, P., Kremer, J., & Kleinschmit, D. (2023). Forest dieback reframed and revisited? Forests (re)negotiated in the German media between forestry and nature conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 147, 102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102883

Miller, A. (2018). Text Mining Digital Humanities Projects: Assessing Content Analysis Capabilities of Voyant Tools. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(3), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1479673

Morais, M. V. B. (2022). Comparação bibliográfica sobre ensino de matemática para pessoas com Transtorno Autista utilizando técnica de Mineração de Texto. REMAT: Revista Eletrônica Da Matemática, 8(1), e2002. https://doi.org/10.35819/remat2022v8i1id5288

Müller, F., Tunn, J., & Kalt, T. (2022). Hydrogen justice. Environmental Research Letters, 17(11), 115006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac991a

Nasr, H., Yousef, M., & Madkour, H. (2019). Impacts of Discharge of Desalination Plants on Marine Environment at the Southern Part of the Egyptian Red Sea Coast (Case Study). International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 4(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190403.12

Panagopoulos, A., Haralambous, K. J., & Loizidou, M. (2019). Desalination brine disposal methods and treatment technologies - A review. Science of the Total Environment, 693, 133545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.351

Renedo-Farpón, C., Canavilhas, J., & Díez-Garrido, M. (2023). Transparency mechanisms in the media: analysis of Spain and Portugal. Profesional de La Informacion, 32(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.05

Sadat-Razavi, P., Karakislak, I., & Hildebrand, J. (2024). German Media Discourses and Public Perceptions on Hydrogen Imports: An Energy Justice Perspective. Energy Technology, 1(1), 2301000. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202301000

Sanz-Hernández, A. (2019). Media and stakeholders: Contribution to the public debate on poverty and energy justice in Spain. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 168, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.168.73

Sebestyén, V. (2021). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Environmental impact networks of renewable energy power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111626

Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075

Seuri, O., Katainen, A., & Toivanen, P. (2023). Blurring boundaries of expert knowledge and stakeholder agenda – News media as a knowledge broker in the Finnish alcohol policy debate. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 4, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100355

Shen, H., Granado, P. C., Jorge, R. S., & Löffler, K. (2024). Environmental and climate impacts of a large-scale deployment of green hydrogen in Europe. Energy and Climate Change, 5, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100133

Shi, X., Liao, X., & Li, Y. (2020). Quantification of fresh water consumption and scarcity footprints of hydrogen from water electrolysis: A methodology framework. Renewable Energy, 154, 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.026

Terlouw, T., Rosa, L., Bauer, C., & McKenna, R. (2024). Future hydrogen economies imply environmental trade-offs and a supply-demand mismatch. Nature Communications, 15(1), 7046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51251-7

Uğurlu-Yıldırım, E., & Dinç-Cavlak, Ö. (2024). Climate policy uncertainty, media coverage of climate change, and energy markets: New evidence from time-varying causality analysis. Energy and Climate Change, 5, 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100134

Vallejos-Romero, A., Cordoves-Sánchez, M., Cisternas, C., Sáez-Ardura, F., Rodríguez, I., Aledo, A., Boso, Á., Prades, J., & Álvarez, B. (2023). Green Hydrogen and Social Sciences: Issues, Problems, and Future Challenges. Sustainability. 15(1), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010303

Vizeu, F., Meneghetti, F. K., & Seifert, R. E. (2012). Por uma crítica ao conceito de desenvolvimento sustentável. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 10(3), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512012000300007

Xavier, T., Gorayeb, A., & Brannstrom, C. (2023). Parques eólicos marítimos (offshore) como fronteira energética? Impactos e sinergias com os aspectos socioambientais e a atividade pesqueira no Nordeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Energia, 29(3), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.47168/rbe.v29i3.790

Ziai, A. (2013). Le discours de « développement » et pourquoi le concept devrait être abandonne. Development in Practice, 23(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2013.752792