Conectando a prática gerencial e o pensamento científico: insights de um jogo de negócios na educação em administração
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
As simulações empresariais são estratégicas aplicadas na educação gerencial para a sustentabilidade, proporcionando aos estudantes de graduação uma experiência prática no enfrentamento dos desafios dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS). Apesar dos avanços, ainda existe uma lacuna na oferta de experiências de aprendizado científico suficientes no nível de graduação. Este estudo explora como as simulações empresariais podem servir como uma ponte entre a prática gerencial e o aprendizado científico. Utilizando pesquisa-ação, os estudantes assumiram papéis como gestores responsáveis dentro das simulações. Sob orientação, identificaram dilemas organizacionais vinculados aos ODS, coletaram dados, aplicaram quadros teóricos e avaliaram os resultados. Esse processo transformou conceitos estáticos em aplicado nas áreas funcionais, com ênfase na responsabilidade e na sustentabilidade. Após as simulações, os estudantes sintetizaram os insights em artigos científicos para aprimorar o raciocínio analítico e a Investigation acadêmica. A contribuição teórica deste estudo reside na demonstração de como as simulações empresariais funcionam como uma ferramenta pedagógica que integra o aprendizado experiencial com a Investigation científica. Ao posicionar os estudantes como pesquisadores ativos, em vez de aprendizes passivos, destaca-se o potencial das simulações para aprimorar o pensamento crítico e a resolução de problemas, enquanto incorpora o raciocínio científico na educação empresarial para enfrentar os desafios dos ODS de forma eficaz.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- Adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- Adota software de verificação de similaridade de conteúdo - plagiarismo (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Mais detalhes do Código de Ética adotado pelo Cadernos EBAPE.BR podem ser visualizados em Normas Éticas e Código de Conduta.
Referências
Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931
Axley, S., & Mcmahon, T. (2006). Complexity: a frontier for management education. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905277316
Barbetta, P. M. (2023). Technologies as tools to increase active learning during online higher-education instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(3), 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221143969
Bertero, C. O. (2006). Ensino e pesquisa em Administração (Teaching and Research in Business Administration). Thomson Learning.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. David McKay.
Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Vera, C. (2020). The impact of educational technologies in higher education. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 20, 155-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.26817/16925777.711
Ching, H. Y., & Silva, E. C. (2017). The use of Bloom’s Taxonomy to develop competences in students of a business undergrad course. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 107-126.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2016). “On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner” - Redux: What does it mean to be reflexive?. Journal of Management Education, 40(6), 740-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916668919
Dobrzinskiene, R., Pauriene, G., Melnychuk, D., Mohelnytska, L., & Sahachko, Y. (2022). Effective management of a learning organization: creating opportunities for informal learning. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 13(3), 36-57.
Dumblekar, V., & Dhar, U. (2021). Learning from a business simulation game: a factor-analytic study. In M. Wardaszko, S. Meijer, H. Lukosch, H. Kanegae, & W. Kriz, Simulation Gaming Through Times and Disciplines: 50th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA 2019, Warsaw, Poland, August 26–30, 2019, Revised Selected Papers 50 (pp. 328-340). Springer International Publishing.
Freire, P. (2019). Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa (Pedagogy of Autonomy: Necessary Knowledge for Educational Practice). Paz e Terra.
Goi, C. L. (2019). The use of business simulation games in teaching and learning. Journal of Education for Business, 94(5), 342-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1536028
Greenberg, R., Raphael, J., Keller, J. L., & Tobias, S. (1998). Teaching high school science using image processing: A case study of implementation of computer technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199803)35:3%3C297::AID-TEA4%3E3.0.CO;2-M
Grinnell, F. (2009). Everyday practice of science: where intuition and passion meet objectivity and logic. Oxford University Press.
Haertle, J., Parkes, C., Murray, A., & Hayes, R. (2017). PRME: Building a global movement on responsible management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.05.002
Häger, F., & Uflacker, M. (2016). Time management practice in educational design thinking projects. In C. Boks, J. Sigurjonsson, M. Steinert, C. Vis, & A. Wulvik (Eds.), Proceedings of NordDesign 2016 (Vol. 2, pp. 319-328). Hasso Plattner Institute.
Hager, P. (2012). Informal learning: everyday living. In P. Javis & M. Watts (Orgs.), The Routledge International Handbook of Learning (pp. 207-215). Routledge.
Hazoff, W., Jr., & Sauaia, A. C. A. (2008). Aprendizagem centrada no participante ou no professor? Um estudo comparativo em Administração de Materiais. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 12, 631-658. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552008000300003
Herger, N. (2023). Informal Learning in Argentina: Contributions to Workers' Education. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 53(1), 10, e10088. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980531410088
Hibbert, P. (2013). Approaching reflexivity through reflection: Issues for critical management education. Journal of Management Education, 37(6), 803-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912467757
Hyytinen, H., Toom, A., & Shavelson, R. J. (2019). Enhancing scientific thinking through the development of critical thinking in higher education. In M. Murtonen & K. Balloo (Eds.), Redefining scientific thinking for higher education: Higher-order thinking, evidence-based reasoning and research skills (pp. 59-78). Palgrave Macmilan.
Jackson, M. K. (2024). Faculty’s formal and informal learning experiences during the transition of a new learning management system at a community college: a case study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09610-0
Keys, B. Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600205
Kiss, T., & Schmuck, R. (2021). A longitudinal study of the skills and attitudes conveyed by two business simulation games in Pécs, Hungary. Simulation & Gaming, 52(4), 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120972458
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7-44.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang, Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-247). Routledge.
Lee, N. Y., Wang, Z., & Lim, B. (2024). The development of critical thinking: What university students have to say. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973412
Margatina, K., Schick, T., Aletras, N., & Dwivedi-Yu, J. (2023). Active learning principles for in-context learning with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14264. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14264
Morin, E. (2002). La méthode: L´humanité de l´humanité. L'identité humaine. Seuil.
Morin, E. (2008). Introdução ao pensamento complexo (5a ed.). Instituto Piaget.
Muff, K., Delacoste, C., & Dyllick, T. (2022). Responsible leadership competencies in leaders around the world: Assessing stakeholder engagement, ethics and values, systems thinking and innovation competencies in leaders around the world', Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2216
Murtonen, M., & Salmento, H. (2019). Broadening the theory of scientific thinking for higher education. In M. Murtonen & K. Balloo (Eds.), Redefining scientific thinking for higher education: Higher-order thinking, evidence-based reasoning and research skills (pp. 3-29). Palgrave Macmilan.
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Parkes, C., Buono, A. F., & Howaidy, G. (2017) The Principles for responsible management education (PRME): The first decade – What has been achieved? The next decade – Responsible management Education’s challenge for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.05.003
Piaget, J. (2012). Epistemologia genética (3a ed., A. Cabral, Trad.). Martins Fontes.
Pnevmatikos, D., Christodoulou, P., Georgiadou, T., & Lithoxoidou, A. (2023). Undergraduate students’ conceptualization of critical thinking and their ideas for critical thinking acquisition. Education Sciences, 13(4), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040416
PRME (2023). Shape the students who shape the world. https://www.unprme.org/
Rosenhead, J., Franco, L. A., Grint, K., & Friedland, B. (2019). Complexity theory and leadership practice: A review, a critique, and some recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.07.002
Saeroji, A., Slamet, A., & Khafid, M. (2018). Scientific learning approach on subject material computer application for financial management. Journal of Economic Education, 7(1), 10-17.
Salas, M. K. (2024). Educational transformation: The effectiveness of educational management in the era of independent learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(7), 1913-1928.
Sanabria-Z, J., Alfaro-Ponce, B., González-Peña, O. I., Terashima-Marín, H., & Ortiz-Bayliss, J. C. (2022). Engagement and social impact in tech-based citizen science initiatives for achieving the SDGs: a systematic literature review with a perspective on complex thinking. Sustainability, 14(17), 10978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710978
Sauaia, A. C. A. (2013). Laboratório de gestão: simulador organizacional, jogo de empresas e pesquisa aplicada. (3a ed.). Manole.
Shah, N. F. A. Z., & Zakaria, Z. (2024). The integration of higher order thinking skills in science classrooms: malaysian teachers’ perspectives and practice. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 570-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i2/21306
Subramaniam, K. (2016). Teachers’ organization of participation structures for teaching science with computer technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 527-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9610-z
Tran, T. T. H. (2009). Why is action research suitable for education?. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 25(2), 97-106.
Trindade, N. R., Trevisan, M., Palma, L. C., & Piveta, M. N. (2022). The construction of interventions based on experiential learning to promote education for sustainability in management teaching. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 20(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200234
Vélez, A., Alonso, R. K., & Rico-González, M. (2023). Business Simulation Games for the Development of Intrinsic Motivation-Boosting Sustainability: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(21), 15483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115483
Zhou, Y. (2023). Teaching mixed methods using active learning approaches. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(4), 396-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221120566