The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives

Main Article Content

Luiz Alberto da Costa Mariz
Sueli Maria Goulart Silva
Débora Dourado
Helder Pontes Régis

Abstract

With the process of maturing in Administration field as knowledge area, is verified the search of its consolidation in the scope of the social sciences. Considering the centrality of the methodological subject for the quality of the knowledge produced in the area of Organizational Theory, this work presents a critical revision of the methodology used in the article published in the annals of ENANPAD, in the period from 1999 to 2002. The main objective is to contribute with the discussions on methodological practices, especially in what it concerns the use of the case study as research strategy. The informations collected were subdivided in three groups contemplating the research design, the techniques of data collection and the dimensions and resources of data analysis. The main results of this study show the predominance of qualitative studies, a relative banality in the use of the case study strategy, the tendency to the objective dimensions, use of interpretative analysis methods, among others. This analysis suggests that the category of basic qualitative study can be used with advantage by the Brazilian researchers in the Administration area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Mariz, L. A. da C., Silva, S. M. G., Dourado, D., & Régis, H. P. (2005). The Case Study Kingdom in the Organizational Theory: imprecisions and alternatives. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 3(2). Retrieved from https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/4916
Section
Articles