Board structure as a mechanism to achieve the UN 2030 Agenda in Latin America
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of board structure on companies’ engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The characteristics of the board of directors related to the size of the board, independence, and diversity were analyzed, as well as the disclosure of the 17 SDGs of 371 companies headquartered in Latin America from 2016 to 2020. The data were analyzed using data regression in a panel with fixed effects and regression of panel data using the logit method. Research findings showed that board size and board independence have a positive effect on SDG disclosure. The results are in line with the Upper Echelons Theory, as it advocates that the company’s strategic choices and positioning are made by senior management – the members of the board of directors. The research expands the explanation of this theory, confirming that top management is crucial for strategic positioning in environmental and social issues. Managers and shareholders must understand that certain features, such as the social responsibility committee and the preparation of a sustainability report, can also contribute to the 2030 Agenda. At the government level, the results are useful for public policy makers, as they can encourage the creation of norms for the voluntary disclosure of environmental and social information.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by Cadernos EBAPE.BR can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Arena, M., Azzone, G., Ratti, S., Urbano, V. M., & Vecchio, G. (2023). Sustainable development goals and corporate reporting: An empirical investigation of the oil and gas industry. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2369
Chindasombatcharoen, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2022). Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 664-677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2264
Correa-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2020). Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121142
Disli, M., Yilmaz, M. K., & Mohamed, F. F. M. (2022). Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 929-952. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2020-0313
Faria, M. J. da S. (2017). Tipos de divulgação da informação financeira e não financeira de responsabilidade social empresarial. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 15(esp), 534-558. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395159702
Farza, K., Ftiti, Z., Hlioui, Z., Louhichi, W., & Omri, A. (2022). The Effect of Corporate Board Characteristics on Environmental Innovation. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 27, 1021-1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-022-09836-3
García-Sánchez, I.-M., & Noguera-Gámez, L. (2018). Institutional Investor Protection Pressures versus Firm Incentives in the Disclosure of Integrated Reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 28(2), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12172
García-Sánchez, I.-M., Aibar-Guzmán, C., Núñez-Torrado, M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2023). Women leaders and female same-sex groups: The same 2030 Agenda objectives along different roads. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113582
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: of Reflection The Its Organization as reflection of its Top managers. Management, 9(2), 193-206.
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. de. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2015). Código das melhores práticas de governança corporativa (5a ed.). https://conhecimento.ibgc.org.br/Paginas/Publicacao.aspx?PubId=21138
Kanadlı, S. B., Bankewitz, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). Job-related diversity: the comprehensiveness and speed of board decision-making processes – an upper echelons approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 427-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9394-4
Khalid, F., Razzaq, A., Ming, J., & Razi, U. (2022). Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG disclosure: how caring about sustainable concerns? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 82064-82077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z
Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). Assessing current company reports according to the IIRC integrated reporting framework. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(2), 305-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2017-0138
Lopes, J. C., & Demajorovic, J. (2020). Responsabilidade Social Corporativa: uma visão crítica a partir do estudo de caso da tragédia socioambiental da Samarco. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(2), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395173811
Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2020). Internal corporate governance strength as a mechanism for achieving sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2068
Morais-da-Silva, R. L., Nobre, F. S., & Orsiolli, T. A. E. (2018). Empresas atuantes na base da pirâmide e as suas contribuições para a sustentabilidade: quadro de análise e evidências empíricas. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(2), 286-301. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-3963314
Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727
Pinheiro, A. B., Menezes, B. G. de O., Oliveira, L. G. L., & Carraro, W. B. W. H. (2022). Agenda 2030: alinhamento dos projetos estratégicos dos tribunais de justiça aos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 13(2), 171-194. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v13i2.21500
Pinheiro, A. B., Oliveira, M. C., Freitas, G. A. de, & Lozano, M. B (2023). Atributos do conselho e divulgação ambiental: qual é o nexo nas economias liberais? Revista de Administração de Empresas, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020230402
Pinheiro, A. B., Oliveira, M. C., & Lozano, M. B. (2022). The mirror effect: influence of national governance on environmental disclosure in coordinate economies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 380-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2022-0009
Pizzi, S., Rosati, F., & Venturelli, A. (2021). The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 404-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2628
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019). Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 588-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1705
Schaedler, L., Graf-vlachy, L., & König, A. (2022). Strategic leadership in organizational crises: A review and research agenda. Long Range Planning, 55(2), 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102156
Sekarlangit, L. D., & Wardhani, R. (2021). The effect of the characteristics and activities of the board of directors on sustainable development goal (SDG) disclosures: Empirical evidence from southeast Asia. Sustainability, 13(14), 8007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148007
Silva, S. (2021). Corporate contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals: An empirical analysis informed by legitimacy theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 125962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125962
Singh, A. K., Bindu Kota, H., Sardana, V., & Singhania, S. (2021). Does Gender Diversity on Board Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? Aabfj, 15(5), 22-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v15i5.3
Toukabri, M., & Youssef, M. A. (2023). Climate change disclosure and sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 agenda: the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 21(1), 30-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2022-0016
Troiani, L., Sehnem, S., & Carvalho, L. (2022). Moda sustentável: uma análise sob a perspectiva do ensino de boas práticas de sustentabilidade e economia circular. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 20(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200214
Van der Waal, J. W. H., Thijssens, T., & Maas, K. (2021). The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press.
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635