Dinámica de las lógicas institucionales de la sostenibilidad en las organizaciones: una revisión sistemática de la literatura
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las lógicas institucionales representan los sistemas de valores y creencias que guían las acciones de los individuos u organizaciones. Este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar la dinámica de interacción de las lógicas que dan forma a las prácticas de sostenibilidad en las organizaciones. La sistematización de las diferentes categorías de interacciones entre lógicas permite analizar cómo se puede incorporar la sostenibilidad en las organizaciones. La investigación se desarrolló desde un enfoque cualitativo, a través de una revisión sistemática junto con un análisis temático para la síntesis e interpretación de resultados. Se observó que a partir de la interpretación de las distintas lógicas se desarrollan las interrelaciones de dominancia, competencia, convivencia o hibridez, las cuales fueron sistematizadas en categorías para analizar los procesos de cambio para el desarrollo de la sostenibilidad en las organizaciones. Se concluye que la aplicación de las lógicas institucionales en el campo de la sostenibilidad va más allá de la perspectiva del desempeño ambiental, ya que las categorías analíticas identificadas permiten comprender los procesos que promueven el cambio para incorporar la sostenibilidad en las organizaciones. En la gestión de las organizaciones, las lógicas institucionales permiten la elaboración de marcos para que los actores puedan crear un lenguaje común para equiparar lógicas contradictorias y crear valor compartido para las partes interesadas y para la propia organización.
Descargas
Métricas
Detalles del artículo
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Albu, N., Albu, C. N., Apostol, O., & Cho, C. H. (2020). The past is never dead: the role of imprints in shaping social and environmental reporting in a post-communist context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1109-1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4131
Alexius, S., & Furusten, S. (2020). Enabling sustainable transformation: hybrid organizations in early phases of path generation. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(3), 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04098-0
Anderson-Gough, F., Edgley, C., Robson, K., & Sharma, N. (2022). Organizational responses to multiple logics: diversity, identity and the professional service firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 103, 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AOS.2022.101336.
Ansari, S. S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: an institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organization Science, 24(4), 1014-1040. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0799
Arenas, D., Strumińska-Kutra, M., & Landoni, P. (2020). Walking the tightrope and stirring things up: exploring the institutional work of sustainable entrepreneurs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3055-3071. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2557
Argento, D., Grossi, G., Persson, K., & Vingren, T. (2019). Sustainability disclosures of hybrid organizations: Swedish state-owned enterprises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), 505-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2018-0362
Ashraf, N., Pinkse, J., Ahmadsimab, A., Ul-Haq, S., & Badar, K. (2019). Divide and rule: the effects of diversity and network structure on a firm’s sustainability performance. Long Range Planning, 52(6), 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.04.002
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43699249
Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brodnik, C., & Brown, R. (2018). Locating periods of institutional change agency: a mixed methods approach. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(7-8), 510-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2017-0161
Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: insights using an institutional logics framework. British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100876
Contrafatto, M., Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2019). Examining the dynamics of SER evolution: an institutional understanding. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(6), 1771-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3044
Corbett, J., Webster, J., & Jenkin, T. A. (2018). Unmasking corporate sustainability at the project level: exploring the influence of institutional logics and individual agency. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2945-1
Cruz, G. (2016). A criticism of the use of ideal types in studies on institutional logics. Organizações & Sociedade, 23(79), 646-655. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230711
Dahlmann, F., & Grosvold, J. (2017). Environmental managers and institutional work: reconciling tensions of competing institutional logics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.65
De Clercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2011). Sustainability in entrepreneurship: a tale of two logics. International Small Business Journal, 29(4), 322-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610372460
Dobson, J. (2019). Reinterpreting urban institutions for sustainability: how epistemic networks shape knowledge and logics. Environmental Science and Policy, 92, 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.018
Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: the contestation of care and science logics in medical education (1967-2005). Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114-149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Franco-Torres, M., Rogers, B. C., & Ugarelli, R. M. (2020). A framework to explain the role of boundary objects in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.010
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). The new instituonalism in organizacional analysis. University of Chicago.
Frostenson, M., & Helin, S. (2017). Ideas in conflict: a case study on tensions in the process of preparing sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(2), 166-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2015-0015
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes: conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299.
Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: a business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817
Gregori, P., Holzmann, P., & Wdowiak, M. A. (2021). For the sake of nature: identity work and meaningful experiences in environmental entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 122, 488-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.032
Gregori, P., Wdowiak, M., Schwarz, E., & Holzmann, P. (2019). Exploring value creation in sustainable entrepreneurship: insights from the institutional logics perspective and the business model lens. Sustainability, 11(9), 2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092505
Grinevich, V., Huber, F., Karataş-Özkan, M., & Yavuz, Ç. (2019). Green entrepreneurship in the sharing economy: utilising multiplicity of institutional logics. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 859-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9935-x
Gümüsay, A. A., Claus, L., & Amis, J. (2020). Engaging with grand challenges: an institutional logics perspective. Organization Theory, 1(3), 263178772096048. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720960487
Hayes, N., & Rajão, R. (2011). Competing institutional logics and sustainable development: the case of geographic information systems in Brazil’s Amazon region. Information Technology for Development, 17(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2010.511701
Hedegård, L., Gustafsson, E., & Paras, M. K. (2020). Management of sustainable fashion retail based on reuse: a struggle with multiple logics. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2019.1667855
Heiskanen, E. (2002). The institutional logic of life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00014-8
Herold, D., & Lee, K.-H. (2017). The influence of the sustainability logic on carbon disclosure in the global logistics industry: the Case of DHL, FDX and UPS. Sustainability, 9(4), 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040601
Hetemi, E., Ordieres-Meré, J., & Nuur, C. (2020). An institutional approach to digitalization in sustainability-oriented infrastructure projects: the limits of the building information model. Sustainability, 12(9), 3893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093893
Hoffman, A. J., & Jennings, P. D. (2015). Institutional theory and the natural environment: research in (and on) the Anthropocene. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 8-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575331
Hoffman, A. J., & Ventresca, M. J. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1368-1392. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921954903
Järvenpää, M., & Länsiluoto, A. (2016). Collective identity, institutional logic and environmental management accounting change. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(2), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2013-0094
Kallman, M. E., & Frickel, S. (2019). Nested logics and smart meter adoption: institutional processes and organizational change in the diffusion of smart meters in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 57, 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101249
Kiefhaber, E., Pavlovich, K., & Spraul, K. (2020). Sustainability-related identities and the institutional environment: the case of New Zealand owner–managers of small–and medium-sized hospitality businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3990-3
Kok, A. M., De Bakker, F. G. A., & Groenewegen, P. (2019). Sustainability struggles: conflicting cultures and incompatible logics. Business and Society, 58(8), 1496-1532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317703644
Laasch, O. (2018). Beyond the purely commercial business model: organizational value logics and the heterogeneity of sustainability business models. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 158-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.09.002
Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). Filtering institutional logics: community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organization Science, 26(3), 847-866. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0959
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
Lounsbury, M, Fairclough, S., & Lee, M.-D. P. (2012). Institutional approaches to organizations and the natural environment. In P. Banasal, & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment. The Oxford University.
Mahmood, Z., & Uddin, S. (2020). Institutional logics and practice variations in sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging field. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1163-1189. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2019-4086
Mars, M. M., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Raging against or with the private marketplace? Logic hybridity and eco-entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608328234
Martínez-Alier, J. (2012). Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2011.648839
McLoughlin, K., & Meehan, J. (2021). The institutional logic of the sustainable organisation: the case of a chocolate supply network. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2020-0773
Micelotta, E., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (2017). Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1885-1910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699522
Misangyi, V. F. (2016). Institutional complexity and the meaning of loose coupling: connecting institutional sayings and (not) doings. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 407-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016635481
Mitzinneck, B. C., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Managing value tensions in collective social entrepreneurship: the role of temporal, structural, and collaborative compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2
Montabon, F., Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2016). Making sustainability sustainable. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12103
Narayanan, V., & Adams, C. A. (2017). Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 344-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1257930
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
Pache, A.-C., & Thornton, P. H. (2020). Hybridity and institutional logics. In: M. L. Besharov, & B. C. Mitzinneck (ed.). Organizational hybridity: perspectives, processes, promises. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000069002
Reddy, C. D., & Hamann, R. (2018). Distance makes the (committed) heart grow colder: MNEs’ responses to the state logic in African variants of CSR. Business and Society, 57(3), 562-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316629127
Rossoni, L., Poli, I. T., De Sinay, M. C. F., & De Araújo, G. A. (2020). Materiality of sustainable practices and the institutional logics of adoption: a comparative study of chemical road transportation companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119058
Safari, M., De Castro, V. B., & Steccolini, I. (2020). The interplay between home and host logics of accountability in multinational corporations (MNCs): the case of the Fundão dam disaster. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 1761-1789. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3912
Sayed, M., Hendry, L. C., & Bell, M. Z. (2017). Institutional complexity and sustainable supply chain management practices. Supply Chain Management, 22(6), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-10-2016-0365
Schneider, S., & Clauß, T. (2020). Business models for sustainability: choices and consequences. Organization & Environment, 33(3), 384-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619854217
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. (2015). Organizations and Organizing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663371
Sharma, A., Moses, A. C., Borah, S. B., & Adhikary, A. (2020). Investigating the impact of workforce racial diversity on the organizational corporate social responsibility performance: an institutional logics perspective. Journal of Business Research, 107, 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.018
Siddiqui, J., Mehjabeen, M., & Stapleton, P. (2021). Emergence of corporate political activities in the guise of social responsibility: dispatches from a developing economy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1137-1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2019-4087
Silva, M. E., & Figueiredo, M. D. (2017). Sustainability as practice: reflections on the creation of an institutional logic. Sustainability, 9(10), 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101839
Silvola, H., & Vinnari, E. (2021). The limits of institutional work: a field study on auditors’ efforts to promote sustainability assurance in a trust society. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3890
Smink, M., Negro, S. O., Niesten, E., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche-regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.004
Stål, H. I. (2015). Inertia and change related to sustainability: an institutional approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.035
Strambach, S., & Pflitsch, G. (2020). Transition topology: capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability. Research Policy, 49(7), 104006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104006
Stubbs, W. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship and B corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1920
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutions and institutional change. In D. A. Buchanan, & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. Sage Publications Ltd.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Waldorff, S. B., Reay, T., & Goodrick, E. (2013). A tale of two countries: how different constellations of logics impact action. In M. Lounsbury, & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, part A. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB008
Watson, R., Wilson, H. N., & Macdonald, E. K. (2020). Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: what works for whom and why? Journal of Business Research, 119, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.023
Weisenfeld, U., & Hauerwaas, A. (2018). Adopters build bridges: changing the institutional logic for more sustainable cities. From action to workset to practice. Research Policy, 47(5), 911-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.015
York, J. G., O’Neil, I., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2016). Exploring environmental entrepreneurship: identity coupling, venture goals, and stakeholder incentives. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 695-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12198