Como fortalecer conexões no ecossistema de inovação
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Objetivo: propor um modelo de conexão entre os atores de um ecossistema de inovação.
Estado da arte: o conceito de ecossistema de inovação está ligado a um ambiente dinâmico e interconectado, no qual coexistem empreendedores, empresas de variados portes, instituições acadêmicas e científicas, incubadoras e aceleradoras, governo, associações e diversos outros atores. Analisar e gerenciar a conexão entre diferentes atores é, portanto, fundamental para o
desenvolvimento de um ecossistema de inovação.
Escopo: o estudo envolveu uma revisão sistemática da literatura e estudo de casos múltiplos em quatro estados brasileiros (Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná, Santa Catarina e Sergipe), 30 cidades e 147 habitats de inovação.
Originalidade: a pesquisa originou modelo inédito de análise da conexão de um ecossistema de inovação, a partir das necessidades que emergiram no estudo de casos múltiplos e das lacunas da literatura acadêmica.
Impactos: o modelo de análise de um211ssistema de inovação parte de uma abordagem enxuta e ágil para ser utilizado por qualquer cidade brasileira, e está ancorado em 10 passos metodológicos para sua efetivação.
Palavras-chave: ecossistema, empreendedorismo, inovação, modelo de conexão.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
Hakala, H., O'Shea, G., Farny, S., & Luoto, S. (2020). Re‐storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts: The model‐narrative review method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212; Silva, M. De, Howels, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011; Jackson, M., Rogers, B., & Zenou, Y. (2017). The economic consequences of social-network structure. Journal of Economic Literature, v, n.1 49-95. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20150694; Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, & practice. Cengage Learning; Mahmoudzadeh, M., & Alborzi, M. (2017). Modeling Iranian innovation network in nanotech for policy: applying an adopted version of SKIN model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2016-0017; Mahmoudzadeh, M., Alborzi, M., Ghazinoori, S., & Khalili Shavarini, S. (2015). Evaluating efficiency of collective learning in innovation networks: Simulation based experiments in SKIN. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(27), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i27/62895; Markkula, M., & Kune, H. (2015). Making smart regions smarter: smart specialization and the role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10). http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/932;
Hakala, H., O'Shea, G., Farny, S., & Luoto, S. (2020). Re‐storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts: The model‐narrative review method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212; Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, & practice. Cengage Learning; Mahmoudzadeh, M., & Alborzi, M. (2017). Modeling Iranian innovation network in nanotech for policy: applying an adopted version of SKIN model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2016-0017; Mahmoudzadeh, M., Alborzi, M., Ghazinoori, S., & Khalili Shavarini, S. (2015). Evaluating efficiency of collective learning in innovation networks: Simulation based experiments in SKIN. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(27), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i27/62895Jackson, D. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation, 1-13; Li, Y. (2009). The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation, 29, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.007; Sawatani, Y., Nakamura, F., Sakakibara, A., Hoshi, M., & Masuda, S. (2007, July). Innovation patterns. In IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC 2007) (pp. 427-434). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2007.71;
Malerba, F. (2003). Sectoral systems and innovation and technology policy. Revista Brasileira
de Inovação, 2(2), 329-375. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v2i2.8648876; Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, schumpeterian dynamics, and spacial boundaries. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. Francis Pinter, London, 130-155.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6; Rampersad, G. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 1122-1134. Retrieved from https://www.scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jrbem/article/view/932; Leten, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Roijakkers, N., Clerix, A., & Van Helleputte, J. (2013). IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, a Public Research Institute in Nano-Electronics. California Management Review, 55(4), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.51;Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons; Hwang, V. W., & Horowitt, G. (2012). The rainforest: The secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Regenwald; Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-81; Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2017). Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 423-449). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970812.ch19; Colombelli, A., Paolucci, E., & Ughetto, E. (2017). Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52, 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4; Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2019). The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 52, 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9956-5; Colombo, M., Dagnino, G., Lehmann, E., & Salmador, M. (2017). The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52, 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9952-9; Rampersad, G. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 1122-1134. https://www.scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jrbem/article/view/932; Hämäläinen, T. J. 2015. Governance Solutions for Wicked Problems: Metropolitan Innovation Ecosystems as Frontrunners to Sustainable Well-Being. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 31-41. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/935; Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204-288); Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 327-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3;
Giovannini, A., Bittencourt, P. F., & Maldonado, M. U. (2020). Innovation ecosystem in application platforms: An exploratory study of the role of users. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 19, 28. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8655371; Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: An overview. Journal ofTechnology Transfer, 44(5), 1347-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09736-x; Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in platform-based ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1203-1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12351;
Mahmoudzadeh, M., & Alborzi, M. (2017). Modeling Iranian innovation network in nanotech for policy: applying an adopted version of SKIN model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2016-0017; Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5; Dolinska, M. (2015). Knowledge based development of innovative companies within the framework of innovation networks. Innovation: Management Policy & Practice, 17(3), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1054603; Valkokari, K. 2015. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8): 17-24. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919; Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006; Gawer, A., & Cussumano, M. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28-35. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-companies-become-platform-leaders/; Gawer A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x; Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco driveindustry innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
Namayande, P., & Khamseh, A. (2019). Innovation ecosystem for SMES in ICT industry. Revista
Gestão & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology, 19, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/0.v0i0.1609; Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O'Kane, C. (2018). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 48(1), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12310; Silva, M. De, Howels, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011; Jarvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A., & Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms. Research Policy, 47(8), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.007; Jackson, D. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation, 1-13
Fiec. Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Ceará (2022). Índice Fiec de Inovação dos Estados. https://www.observatorio.ind.br/inteligencia-competitiva?conteudo=c1&sub=sc1
Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p. 282; Yin, R. (2017). Case Study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p. 352.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo. 7.ed. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Moore, J. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy. The Age of Business Ecosystems. New York, NY: HarperCollins.; Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75-86. https://parsmodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/InnEcho-Moore1993.pdf
Dedehayir, O., Makinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. (2018). R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis:
A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136,18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028; Manley, Y, K. (2002). The systems approach to innovation studies. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v9i2.196
Felizola, Matheus Pereira Mattos. (2021). Innovation Ecosystems Connection – Modelo de conexão entre os atores de um ecossistema de inovação /Orientadora Iracema Machado Aragão. UFS, São Cristóvão, SE, 326 f.