Desenvolvendo universidades empreendedoras
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objetivo: propor um framework para o desenvolvimento de Universidades Empreendedoras (UEs).
Estado da arte: um dos principais conceitos associados à UE é a integração do modelo de stakeholders da Quádrupla Hélice, que enfatiza a colaboração entre empresas, academia, comunidade e governo nos processos de inovação. Embora haja vastas pesquisas sobre empreendedorismo, a literatura não possui um modelo prático e integrado para o desenvolvimento de UEs.
Escopo: foi realizada revisão sistemática de literatura de 83 artigos científicos, a partir das bases de dados Web of Science e EBSCO de modo a construir um framework para o desenvolvimento da UE.
Originalidade: o framework desenvolvido conecta diversos aspectos internos e externos da UE de modo a ampliar o papel das universidades no processo empreendedor.
Impacto: o framework traz um mapa prático aos gestores de universidades, líderes empresariais e líderes de governo e de outras organizações.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Heaton, S., Lewin, D., & Teece, D. J. (2020). Managing campus entrepreneurship: Dynamic capabilities and university leadership. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 1126-1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015
Thomas, E., Faccin, K., & Asheim, B. T. (2021). Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies. Growth and Change, 52(2), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12442
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 43-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
Senivongse, C., Bennet, A., & Mariano, S. (2017). Utilizing a systematic literature review to develop an integrated framework for information and knowledge management systems. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(2), 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-03-2017-0011
Brandão, C. E., & Becker, J. L. (2022). Como gerenciar os riscos de inteligência artificial. GV-Executivo, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v21n4.2022.88403; Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600304
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.821318; Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L. E., & Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628; Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M. Van, & Tornikoski, E. T. (2013). Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056; Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.007
Charney, A., & Libecap, G. D. (2000). The impact of entrepreneurship education: An evaluation of the Berger Entrepreneurship Program at the University of Arizona, 1985-1999. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1262343
Sirelkhatim, F., & Gangi, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1052034. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park, MA; Isenberg, D. J. (2016). Applying the ecosystem metaphor to entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61(4), 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16676162; Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Maritz, A. (2017). Illuminating the black box of entrepreneurship education programmes: Part 2. Education+ Training, 59(5), 471-482 https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2017-0018; Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.
org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
Shane, S., & Eckhardt, J. (2003). The individual-opportunity nexus. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 161-191). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_8
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Decreto n. 10.534, de 28 de outubro de 2020. (2020). Política Nacional de Inovação. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2020/decreto/D10534.htm
Lei n. 11.196, de 21 de novembro de 2005. (2005). Regime especial de tributação para a plataforma de exportação de serviços de tecnologia da informação – REPES. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2005/lei/l11196.htm
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182-210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44645034
Shane, S., & Eckhardt, J. (2003). The individual-opportunity nexus. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 161-191). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24519-7_8
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park, MA
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Heaton, S., Lewin, D., & Teece, D. J. (2020). Managing campus entrepreneurship: Dynamic capabilities and university leadership. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 1126-1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015
Toscher, B. (2019). Entrepreneurial learning in arts entrepreneurship education: A conceptual framework. Artivate, 8(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1353/artv.2019.0003
Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182-210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44645034; Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
Nair, S., Gaim, M., & Dimov, D. (2022). Toward the emergence of entrepreneurial opportunities: Organizing early-phase new venture creation support systems. Academy of Management Review, 47(1), 162-183. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0040
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park, MA; Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167; Nair, S., Gaim, M., & Dimov, D. (2022). Toward the emergence of entrepreneurial opportunities: Organizing early-phase new venture creation support systems. Academy of Management Review, 47(1), 162-183. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0040
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park, MA
Thomas et al. (2021); Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2022). A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202050
Christensen, Clayton M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Decreto n. 10.534, de 28 de outubro de 2020. (2020). Política Nacional de Inovação. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2020/decreto/D10534.htm
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180
Meek, W. R., & Gianiodis, P. T. (2023). The death and rebirth of the entrepreneurial university model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0180