Leitura do institucionalismo organizacional a partir da teoria do organizar de Karl Weick
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O objetivo central deste artigo é evidenciar as possibilidades de uso da teoria do organizar de Karl Weick como microfundamento para o institucionalismo organizacional, considerando que essa abordagem da ação se mostra mais adequada do que aquelas predominantes nos estudos institucionalistas. Partindo do pressuposto de que a ação em organizações se orienta por ordens institucionais abrangentes que não estão desconectadas da interação social e dos processos de construção de sentidos, propõe-se a integração entre o institucionalismo organizacional e a teoria do organizar como base para a análise de processos organizativos. Por meio de revisão das denominadas “ondas” da teoria neoinstitucional em organizações, aborda-se a relação entre o organizar, a construção de sentidos e as instituições. Além de apresentar uma síntese da trajetória do institucionalismo organizacional, destacam-se deslocamentos epistemológicos observados no âmbito desse corpo teórico ao longo do tempo. Por fim, apresentam-se as potenciais contribuições do uso da teoria do organizar (WEICK, 1979) como microfundamento teórico adequado para a análise institucional de estratégias e práticas empregadas para a manutenção de organizações.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- Adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- Adota software de verificação de similaridade de conteúdo - plagiarismo (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Mais detalhes do Código de Ética adotado pelo Cadernos EBAPE.BR podem ser visualizados em Normas Éticas e Código de Conduta.
Referências
ABERNETHY, M. A.; CHUA, W. F. A field study of control system “redesign”: the impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 13, n. 2, p. 569-606, 1996.
BARLEY, S. R. Coalface institutionalism. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 2008. p. 822.
BARLEY, S. R.; TOLBERT, P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, v. 18, n. 1, p. 93-117, 1997.
BATTILANA, J. Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, v. 13, n. 5, p. 653-676, 2006.
BATTILANA, J.; DORADO, S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, v. 53, n. 6, p. 1419-1440, 2010.
BERGER, P. L.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1974.
BERNINI, C. I. Guapiruvu (Sete Barras-SP): um encontro contraditório entre ambientalismo e luta pela terra. 2005. 81 f. Monografia (Graduação em Geografia) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005.
BERNINI, C. I. De posseiro a assentado: a reinvenção da comunidade do Guapiruvu na construção contraditória do assentamento agroambiental Alves, Teixeira e Pereira, Sete Barras-SP. 2009. 174 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia Humana) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009.
BINDER, A. For love and money: organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, v. 36, n. 6, p. 547-571, 2007.
BOURDIEU, P. A distinção. São Paulo: Edusp, 2007.
COLEMAN, A. et al. Local histories and local sensemaking: a case of policy implementation in the English National Health Service. Policy & Politics, v. 38, n. 2, p. 289-306, 2010.
CORNELISSEN, J. P.; CLARKE, J. S. Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. The Academy of Management Review, v. 35, n. 4, p. 539-557, 2010.
CZARNIAWSKA, B. A theory of organizing. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014.
DIMAGGIO, P. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: ZUCKER, L. (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. p. 3-21.
DIMAGGIO, P.; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, 1983.
DOBBIN, F. et al. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, v. 99, n. 2, p. 396-427, 1993.
DOUGLAS, M. How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1986.
EDWARDS, T. Institutional theory: reflections on ontology. In: RAZA, M.; WILLMOTT, H.; GREENWOOD, M. (Ed.). The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies. London/New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 125-137.
EMIRBAYER, M. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 2, p. 281-317, 1997.
EMIRBAYER, M.; MISCHE, A. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 4, p. 962-1023, 1998.
FINE, G. A. The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 61-87, 1993.
FLIGSTEIN, N. The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1990.
FRIEDLAND, R. Institution, practice, and ontology: toward a religious sociology. In: FRIEDLAND, R. Institutions and ideology. Bingley: Emerald, 2009. p. 45-83.
FRIEDLAND, R.; ALFORD, R. R. Bringing society back. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 232-267.
GLYNN, M. A. Book Review, The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (by Thornton, Ocasio & Lounsbury). Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 58, n. 3, 2013. p. 493-495.
GOULDNER, A. W. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1954.
GRIGOLETTO, F. O bairro Guapiruvu como lugar-organização: uma abordagem institucional do organizar. 2018. 258 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo) – Programa de Administração Pública e Governo, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2018.
HAEDICKE, M. A. “Keeping our mission, changing our system”: translation and organizational change in natural foods co‐ops. The Sociological Quarterly, v. 53, n. 1, p. 44-67, 2012.
HALLETT, T. The myth incarnate recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, v. 75, n. 1, p. 52-74, 2010.
HALLETT, T.; VENTRESCA, M. J. Inhabited institutions: social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, v. 35, n. 2, p. 213-236, 2006.
HARDY, C.; MAGUIRE, S. Institutional entrepreneurship. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008. p. 198-217.
HIRSCH, P. M.; LOUNSBURY, M. Ending the family quarrel: toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, v. 40, n. 4, p. 406-418, 1997.
HIRSCH, P. M.; LOUNSBURY, M. Toward a more critical and “powerful” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 96-99, 2015.
HWANG, H.; COLYVAS, J. A. Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 1, p. 62-66, 2011.
JARZABKOWSKI, P.; MATTHIESEN, J.; VAN DE VEN, A. “Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism”. In: LAWRENCE, T.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. (Ed.). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 284-316.
JENSEN, T. B.; KJÆRGAARD, A.; SVEJVIG, P. Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: a case study of information system implementation in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, v. 24, n. 4, p. 343-353, 2009.
KATZ, D.; KAHN, R. L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
LAWRENCE T. B.; SUDDABY, R. ‘Institutions and Institutional Work’. In: CLEGG, S. R. et al. (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, 2006. p. 215-254.
LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
LOW, B.; JOHNSTON, W. Securing and managing an organization’s network legitimacy: the case of Motorola China. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 37, n. 7, p. 873-879, 2008.
MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; FONSECA, V.; CRUBELLATE, J. M. Estrutura, agência e interpretação: elementos para uma abordagem recursiva do processo de institucionalização. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 9, n. esp., p. 9-40, 2005.
MACIEL, C. O.; WEYMER, A. S. Q.; AUGUSTO, P. O. M. Identificando os condicionantes socialmente construídos (Enacted) das práticas estratégicas em ambientes altamente institucionalizados. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 16, n. 1, p. 79-97 2012.
MAGUIRE, S.; HARDY, C.; LAWRENCE, T. B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 5, p. 657-679, 2004.
MAIR, J.; MAYER, J.; LUTZ, E. Navigating institutional plurality: organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, v. 36, n. 6, p. 713-739, 2015.
MAITLIS, S.; CHRISTIANSON, M. Sensemaking in organizations: taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 8, n. 1, p. 57-125, 2014.
MARINHO, M. A. Conflitos e possíveis diálogos entre unidades de conservação e populações camponesas: uma análise do Parque Estadual Intervales e o bairro Guapiruvu (Vale do Ribeira/SP). 2006. 105 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.
MARQUIS, C.; GLYNN, M. A.; DAVIS, G. F. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 3, p. 925-945, 2007.
MARTÍ, I.; MAIR, J. Bringing change into the lives of the poor: entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. In: LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. (Ed.). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 92-119.
MCKAGUE, K.; ZIESTMA, C.; OLIVER, C. Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies, v. 36, n. 8, p. 1063-1093, 2015.
MENDONÇA, P. M. E.; ALVES, M. A. Institutional entrepreneurship and professionalization of the rural development of the sisal region in Brazil. Revista de Administração, v. 47, n. 3, p. 489-499, 2012.
MEYER, J. W.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340-363, 1977.
WRIGHT-MILLS, C. W. A imaginação sociológica. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1975.
MUNIR, K. A. A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 90-92, 2015.
MUTCH, A. Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Review, v. 43, n. 2, p. 242-258, 2018.
NOGUEIRA, F. A. Gestão de membresia: a relação entre associação e associados em três casos brasileiros. 2014. 351 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo) – Programa de Administração Pública e Governo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, 2014.
PACHE, A.; SANTOS, F. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, v. 56, n. 4, p. 972-1001, 2013.
PARKER, M. et al. (Ed.). The Routledge companion to alternative organization. London/New York: Routledge, 2014.
POWELL, W. W.; COLYVAS, J. A. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008. p. 276-298.
POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. Introduction. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 1-38.
ROTHSCHILD-WHITT, J. The collectivist organization: an alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review, v. 44, n. 4, p. 509-527, 1979.
SANDBERG, J.; TSOUKAS, H. Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 36, p. 6-32, 2015.
SCHUTZ, A. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations: foundations for organizational science. London: Sage, 1995.
SCULLY, M.; CREED, D. Stealth legitimacy: employee activism and corporate response during the diffusion of domestic partner benefits. In: THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT MEETINGS, 1997, Boston. Proceedings... Boston: Academy of Management, 1997.
SELZNICK, P. TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1949. v. 3.
SEO, M.; CREED, W. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 2, p. 222-247, 2002.
SHARMA, G.; GOOD, D. The work of middle managers: sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. 49, n. 1, p. 95-122, 2013.
STINCHCOMBE, A. Organizations and social structure. In: MARCH, J. G. (Ed.). Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965. p. 142-193.
SUDDABY, R. Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 1, p. 14-20, 2010.
SUDDABY, R. Can institutional theory be critical? Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 93-95, 2015.
SUDDABY, R. Toward a historical consciousness: following the historic turn in management thought. M@n@gement, v. 19, n. 1, p. 46-60, 2016.
SUDDABY, R.; FOSTER, W. M.; MILLS, A. J. Historical institutionalism. In: BUCHELI, M.; WADHWANI, D. (Ed.). Organizations in time: history, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 110-123.
SUDDABY, R.; VIALE, T.; GENDRON, Y. Reflexivity: the role of embedded social position and entrepreneurial social skill in processes of field level change. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 36, p. 225-245, 2016.
SWIDLER, A. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, v. 51, n. 2, p. 273-286, 1986.
THORNTON, P. H.; OCASIO, W.; LOUNSBURY, M. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 28, p. 22-39, 1983.
VORONOV, M.; VINCE, R. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 58-81, 2012.
WANDERLEY, M. N. B. Agricultura familiar e campesinato: rupturas e continuidade. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, v. 21, p. 42-61, 2003.
WANDERLEY, M. N. B. O mundo rural brasileiro: acesso a bens e serviços e integração campo-cidade. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura e Sociedade, v.17, n. 1, p. 60-85, 2009.
WEBER, K.; GLYNN, M. A. Making sense with institutions: context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1639-1660, 2006.
WEICK, K. The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
WEICK, K. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage, 1995.
WEICK, K. E.; SUTCLIFFE, K. M.; OBSTFELD, D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 4, p. 409-421, 2005.
WILLMOTT, H. “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 1, p. 67-72, 2011.
WILLMOTT, H. Why institutional theory cannot be critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 105-111, 2015.
ZUCKER, L. G. Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In: ZUCKER, L. G. (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. p. 23-52.