A reading of organizational institutionalism using Karl Weick’s organizing theory

Main Article Content

Fábio Grigoletto
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3691-9743
Mário Aquino Alves
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-2585

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to highlight the possibilities of using the organizing approach as a micro foundation for organizational institutionalism given that it presents a theory of action more adequate than the ones which predominate in the institutionalist works. Based on the assumption that action in organizations is guided by comprehensive institutional orders that are not, however, isolated from social interaction and sense-building processes, it is proposed to integrate institutional theory with the approach of organizing as a base for the analysis of organizational processes. Through a review of what we call different “waves” of neo-institutional theory in organizations, we theorize the relationship between organizing, sensemaking, and institutions. In addition to presenting a synthesis of the trajectory of organizational institutionalism, we highlight some epistemological shifts observed within this theoretical body over time. Finally, we present the potential contributions of the use of an analytical lens that takes the approach of organizing (WEICK, 1979) as a theoretical micro foundation suitable for the institutional analysis of strategies and practices employed for the maintenance in organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Grigoletto, F., & Alves, M. A. (2019). A reading of organizational institutionalism using Karl Weick’s organizing theory. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395172948
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Fábio Grigoletto, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)

Doutorando em Administração Pública e Governo na Fundação Getúlio Vargas, na linha de pesquisa Governo e Sociedade Civil em Contexto Subnacional. Mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional e Meio Ambiente pelo Centro Universitário de Araraquara - UNIARA (2011), na Linha de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento. Possui Graduação em Administração Pública pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (2010) Atualmente atua em pesquisas no Centro de Estudos em Administração Pública e Governo - CEAPG, tendo como interesse de pesquisa políticas públicas, agricultura familiar, assentamentos rurais de Reforma Agrária, economia solidária e desenvolvimento rural sustentável.

Mário Aquino Alves, Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EAESP)

Mario Aquino Alves possui graduação em Administração Pública pela Fundação Getulio Vargas - SP (1991), graduação em Direito pela Universidade de São Paulo (1996), mestrado e doutorado em Administração de Empresas (1996, 2002) pela Fundação Getulio Vargas - SP. Foi Visiting Researcher do Centre for Voluntary Organisation da London School of Economics-LSE (Reino Unido) e fez estágio pós-doutoral na HEC Montréal (Canadá). Atualmente é Professor Adjunto da Fundação Getulio Vargas – SP e membro da Linha de Pesquisa Governo e Sociedade Civil em Contexto Subnacional. É pesquisador 1D do CNPq. É professor dos cursos de Mestrado e Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo da Fundação Getulio Vargas – SP, onde orienta mestrandos e doutorandos. Tem experiência na área de Administração Pública, com ênfase em Teoria das Organizações, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas de pesquisa: terceiro setor, teoria das organizações, políticas públicas, métodos qualitativos de pesquisa, análise do discurso e análise de narrativas.

References

ABERNETHY, M. A.; CHUA, W. F. A field study of control system “redesign”: the impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, v. 13, n. 2, p. 569-606, 1996.

BARLEY, S. R. Coalface institutionalism. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 2008. p. 822.

BARLEY, S. R.; TOLBERT, P. S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, v. 18, n. 1, p. 93-117, 1997.

BATTILANA, J. Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, v. 13, n. 5, p. 653-676, 2006.

BATTILANA, J.; DORADO, S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, v. 53, n. 6, p. 1419-1440, 2010.

BERGER, P. L.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1974.

BERNINI, C. I. Guapiruvu (Sete Barras-SP): um encontro contraditório entre ambientalismo e luta pela terra. 2005. 81 f. Monografia (Graduação em Geografia) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005.

BERNINI, C. I. De posseiro a assentado: a reinvenção da comunidade do Guapiruvu na construção contraditória do assentamento agroambiental Alves, Teixeira e Pereira, Sete Barras-SP. 2009. 174 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia Humana) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009.

BINDER, A. For love and money: organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, v. 36, n. 6, p. 547-571, 2007.

BOURDIEU, P. A distinção. São Paulo: Edusp, 2007.

COLEMAN, A. et al. Local histories and local sensemaking: a case of policy implementation in the English National Health Service. Policy & Politics, v. 38, n. 2, p. 289-306, 2010.

CORNELISSEN, J. P.; CLARKE, J. S. Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. The Academy of Management Review, v. 35, n. 4, p. 539-557, 2010.

CZARNIAWSKA, B. A theory of organizing. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014.

DIMAGGIO, P. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: ZUCKER, L. (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. p. 3-21.

DIMAGGIO, P.; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, 1983.

DOBBIN, F. et al. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, v. 99, n. 2, p. 396-427, 1993.

DOUGLAS, M. How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1986.

EDWARDS, T. Institutional theory: reflections on ontology. In: RAZA, M.; WILLMOTT, H.; GREENWOOD, M. (Ed.). The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies. London/New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 125-137.

EMIRBAYER, M. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 2, p. 281-317, 1997.

EMIRBAYER, M.; MISCHE, A. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 4, p. 962-1023, 1998.

FINE, G. A. The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 61-87, 1993.

FLIGSTEIN, N. The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1990.

FRIEDLAND, R. Institution, practice, and ontology: toward a religious sociology. In: FRIEDLAND, R. Institutions and ideology. Bingley: Emerald, 2009. p. 45-83.

FRIEDLAND, R.; ALFORD, R. R. Bringing society back. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 232-267.

GLYNN, M. A. Book Review, The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (by Thornton, Ocasio & Lounsbury). Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 58, n. 3, 2013. p. 493-495.

GOULDNER, A. W. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1954.

GRIGOLETTO, F. O bairro Guapiruvu como lugar-organização: uma abordagem institucional do organizar. 2018. 258 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo) – Programa de Administração Pública e Governo, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2018.

HAEDICKE, M. A. “Keeping our mission, changing our system”: translation and organizational change in natural foods co‐ops. The Sociological Quarterly, v. 53, n. 1, p. 44-67, 2012.

HALLETT, T. The myth incarnate recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, v. 75, n. 1, p. 52-74, 2010.

HALLETT, T.; VENTRESCA, M. J. Inhabited institutions: social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, v. 35, n. 2, p. 213-236, 2006.

HARDY, C.; MAGUIRE, S. Institutional entrepreneurship. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008. p. 198-217.

HIRSCH, P. M.; LOUNSBURY, M. Ending the family quarrel: toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, v. 40, n. 4, p. 406-418, 1997.

HIRSCH, P. M.; LOUNSBURY, M. Toward a more critical and “powerful” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 96-99, 2015.

HWANG, H.; COLYVAS, J. A. Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 1, p. 62-66, 2011.

JARZABKOWSKI, P.; MATTHIESEN, J.; VAN DE VEN, A. “Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism”. In: LAWRENCE, T.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. (Ed.). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 284-316.

JENSEN, T. B.; KJÆRGAARD, A.; SVEJVIG, P. Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: a case study of information system implementation in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, v. 24, n. 4, p. 343-353, 2009.

KATZ, D.; KAHN, R. L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.

LAWRENCE T. B.; SUDDABY, R. ‘Institutions and Institutional Work’. In: CLEGG, S. R. et al. (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, 2006. p. 215-254.

LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

LOW, B.; JOHNSTON, W. Securing and managing an organization’s network legitimacy: the case of Motorola China. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 37, n. 7, p. 873-879, 2008.

MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; FONSECA, V.; CRUBELLATE, J. M. Estrutura, agência e interpretação: elementos para uma abordagem recursiva do processo de institucionalização. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 9, n. esp., p. 9-40, 2005.

MACIEL, C. O.; WEYMER, A. S. Q.; AUGUSTO, P. O. M. Identificando os condicionantes socialmente construídos (Enacted) das práticas estratégicas em ambientes altamente institucionalizados. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 16, n. 1, p. 79-97 2012.

MAGUIRE, S.; HARDY, C.; LAWRENCE, T. B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 5, p. 657-679, 2004.

MAIR, J.; MAYER, J.; LUTZ, E. Navigating institutional plurality: organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, v. 36, n. 6, p. 713-739, 2015.

MAITLIS, S.; CHRISTIANSON, M. Sensemaking in organizations: taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 8, n. 1, p. 57-125, 2014.

MARINHO, M. A. Conflitos e possíveis diálogos entre unidades de conservação e populações camponesas: uma análise do Parque Estadual Intervales e o bairro Guapiruvu (Vale do Ribeira/SP). 2006. 105 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.

MARQUIS, C.; GLYNN, M. A.; DAVIS, G. F. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 3, p. 925-945, 2007.

MARTÍ, I.; MAIR, J. Bringing change into the lives of the poor: entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. In: LAWRENCE, T. B.; SUDDABY, R.; LECA, B. (Ed.). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 92-119.

MCKAGUE, K.; ZIESTMA, C.; OLIVER, C. Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies, v. 36, n. 8, p. 1063-1093, 2015.

MENDONÇA, P. M. E.; ALVES, M. A. Institutional entrepreneurship and professionalization of the rural development of the sisal region in Brazil. Revista de Administração, v. 47, n. 3, p. 489-499, 2012.

MEYER, J. W.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340-363, 1977.

WRIGHT-MILLS, C. W. A imaginação sociológica. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1975.

MUNIR, K. A. A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 90-92, 2015.

MUTCH, A. Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Review, v. 43, n. 2, p. 242-258, 2018.

NOGUEIRA, F. A. Gestão de membresia: a relação entre associação e associados em três casos brasileiros. 2014. 351 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo) – Programa de Administração Pública e Governo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo, 2014.

PACHE, A.; SANTOS, F. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, v. 56, n. 4, p. 972-1001, 2013.

PARKER, M. et al. (Ed.). The Routledge companion to alternative organization. London/New York: Routledge, 2014.

POWELL, W. W.; COLYVAS, J. A. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In: GREENWOOD, R. et al. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008. p. 276-298.

POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. Introduction. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. p. 1-38.

ROTHSCHILD-WHITT, J. The collectivist organization: an alternative to rational-bureaucratic models. American Sociological Review, v. 44, n. 4, p. 509-527, 1979.

SANDBERG, J.; TSOUKAS, H. Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 36, p. 6-32, 2015.

SCHUTZ, A. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations: foundations for organizational science. London: Sage, 1995.

SCULLY, M.; CREED, D. Stealth legitimacy: employee activism and corporate response during the diffusion of domestic partner benefits. In: THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT MEETINGS, 1997, Boston. Proceedings... Boston: Academy of Management, 1997.

SELZNICK, P. TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1949. v. 3.

SEO, M.; CREED, W. D. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 2, p. 222-247, 2002.

SHARMA, G.; GOOD, D. The work of middle managers: sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. 49, n. 1, p. 95-122, 2013.

STINCHCOMBE, A. Organizations and social structure. In: MARCH, J. G. (Ed.). Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965. p. 142-193.

SUDDABY, R. Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 1, p. 14-20, 2010.

SUDDABY, R. Can institutional theory be critical? Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 93-95, 2015.

SUDDABY, R. Toward a historical consciousness: following the historic turn in management thought. M@n@gement, v. 19, n. 1, p. 46-60, 2016.

SUDDABY, R.; FOSTER, W. M.; MILLS, A. J. Historical institutionalism. In: BUCHELI, M.; WADHWANI, D. (Ed.). Organizations in time: history, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 110-123.

SUDDABY, R.; VIALE, T.; GENDRON, Y. Reflexivity: the role of embedded social position and entrepreneurial social skill in processes of field level change. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 36, p. 225-245, 2016.

SWIDLER, A. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, v. 51, n. 2, p. 273-286, 1986.

THORNTON, P. H.; OCASIO, W.; LOUNSBURY, M. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 28, p. 22-39, 1983.

VORONOV, M.; VINCE, R. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 58-81, 2012.

WANDERLEY, M. N. B. Agricultura familiar e campesinato: rupturas e continuidade. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, v. 21, p. 42-61, 2003.

WANDERLEY, M. N. B. O mundo rural brasileiro: acesso a bens e serviços e integração campo-cidade. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura e Sociedade, v.17, n. 1, p. 60-85, 2009.

WEBER, K.; GLYNN, M. A. Making sense with institutions: context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, v. 27, n. 11, p. 1639-1660, 2006.

WEICK, K. The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

WEICK, K. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage, 1995.

WEICK, K. E.; SUTCLIFFE, K. M.; OBSTFELD, D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 4, p. 409-421, 2005.

WILLMOTT, H. “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 1, p. 67-72, 2011.

WILLMOTT, H. Why institutional theory cannot be critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 105-111, 2015.

ZUCKER, L. G. Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In: ZUCKER, L. G. (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. p. 23-52.