University-Business-Government Interaction: the case of the Brazil-Singapore Educational Program for Knowledge Transfer
Main Article Content
Abstract
The university-business-government interactions in Brazil reflect the orientation of public policies and models adopted by the National Innovation System, in which the university becomes an important social actor in economic development. When considering the university’s role and its relationship with the state and the market, this study analyzes how the configuration of a Triple Helix model occurs in the university-business-government relationship. The qualitative approach uses a case study of an international educational cooperation program for knowledge transfer. Data collection occurred through documents and in-depth interviews that were analyzed using content analysis. The results demonstrate that the configuration of the Triple Helix is laissez-faire. However, it presents an imbalance in the participation of the actors involved. The state government offered support and was limited to regulate and establish the intermediation between the university and the company in an institutional way. The company starred the relationship, taking responsibility for most of the actions that should have been taken by the other actors. The university sought to balance its social and economic purposes by implementing Entrepreneurial University principles in its structure and by managing intercultural obstacles to articulate other partnerships. Among the actions taken are the creation of a research and extension program and a doctoral course focused on the naval industry. This shows that this kind of interaction can promote promote innovation, although incrementally, in the long run.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by Cadernos EBAPE.BR can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
ABRUCIO, F. L. O impacto do modelo gerencial na administração pública. Um breve estudo sobre a experiência internacional recente. Brasília, DF: Fundação Escola Nacional de Administração Pública, 1997. (Cadernos ENAP, n. 10).
ALMEIDA, M.; TERRA, B.; MONTSERRAT, M. The incubator movement: A comparative analysis of Brazil and Mexico. In: SAAD, M.; ZAWDIE, G. (Eds.). Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and challenges. London: Routledge, 2011. p. 192-205.
AMARAL, M.; FERREIRA, A.; TEODORO, P. Building an Entrepreneurial University in Brazil: the role and potential of university–industry linkages in promoting regional economic development. Industry and Higher Education, v. 25, n. 5, p. 383-395, 2011.
AMIR, S.; NUGROHO, Y. Beyond the triple helix: framing STS in the developmental context. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, v. 33, n. 3-4, p. 115-126, 2013.
ARMANDO, E. et al. Triple Helix influence on competitiveness factors: Comparison between wine clusters in Brazil and Chile, Review of International Business, v. 12, n. 3, p. 43-60, 2017.
ARMBRUSTER, C. Research universities: autonomy and self-reliance after the Entrepreneurial University. Policy Futures in Education, v. 6, n. 4, p. 372-389, 2008.
AUDRETSCH, D. From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 39, n.3, p. 313-321, 2014.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2006.
BRASIL. Lei n. 10.973, de 02 de dezembro de 2004. Brasília, DF: Diário da União, 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm>. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2014.
BRASIL. Presidência da República. Reconstruir a indústria naval foi uma decisão estratégica do governo, afirma presidenta. Brasília, DF: Diário da União, 2015a. Disponível em: <http://blog.planalto.gov.br/assunto/promef/>. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2015.
BRASIL. Ministério das Relações Exteriores. República de Cingapura: informações ostensivas. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 2015b. Disponível em: <http://www.senado.gov.br/atividade/materia/getPDF.asp?t=181487&tp=1>. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2015.
BRASIL. Lei n. 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Marco Legal de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Brasília, DF: Diário da União, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Lei/L13243.htm#art2>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2018.
BRESSER PEREIRA, L. C. Democracy, social state and managerial reform. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 50, n. 1, p. 112-116, 2010.
CAI, Y. Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2014.
CAMPOS NETO, C. A. S.; POMPERMAYER, F. M. Ressurgimento da indústria naval no Brasil (2000-2013). Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2014.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; BARTH, T. D.; CAMPBELL, D. F. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 1, n. 1, p. 2, 2012.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; CAMPBELL, D. F. J. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 46, n. 3/4, p. 201-234, 2009.
CASTRO, M. H. M. Universidade e inovação: configurações institucionais e terceira missão. Caderno CRH, v. 24, n. 63, p. 555-573, 2011.
CHINTA, R.; SUSSAN F. A Triple-Helix Ecosystem for Entrepreneurship: A Case Review. In.: O'CONNOR et. al. (Orgs). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: International Studies in Entrepreneurship. New York: Springer, 2018. p. 67-80.
CHOI, S., YANG, J., & PARK, H. The triple helix and international collaboration in science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 1, p. 201-212, 2015.
COOKE, P. Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: exploring “globalisation 2” - a new model of industry organisation. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1128-1149, 2005.
CRESWELL, J. W.; CLARCK, D. Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos mistos. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2013.
DAGNINO, R. A relação universidade-empresa no Brasil e o argumento da hélice tripla. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 2, n. 2, p. 267-307, 2003.
DAGNINO, R. Ciência e Tecnologia no Brasil: O processo decisório e a comunidade de pesquisa. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 2007.
ELZINGA, A. New public management, science policy and the orchestration of university research: academic science the loser. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, v. 6, p. 307-332, 2010.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Studies of science etudes sur la science innovation in innovation : the triple helix of university ± industry ± government relations. Social Science Information, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293–337, 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2011). The triple helix model. Innovation, v. 1, n. 4, p. 5-10, 2011.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Anatomy of the entrepeneurial university. Social Science Information, v. 52, n. 3, p. 486–511, 2013.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university–industry–government relations. Minerva, v. 36, n. 3, p. 203-208, 1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, n. 2, p. 109-123, 2000.
FERREIRA, A.; AMARAL, M.; LEOPOLDI, M. A. Análise da interação universidade-empresa sob a perspectiva do corpo docente: um estudo de caso em uma universidade pública. RACE Unoeste v. 12, n. 2, p. 677–708, 2013.
GEUNA, A.; MUSCIO, A. The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature. Minerva, v. 47, n. 1, p. 93-114, 2009.
GIBB, A.; HASKINS, G.; & ROBERTSON, I. Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In: ALTMAN, A; EBERSBERGER, B. (Eds.). Universities in Change: Managing higher education institutions in the age of globalization. New York: Springer, 2013. p. 9-45.
GIBBONS, M., et al. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE, 1994.
GIBBS, G. Análise de dados qualitativos. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.
GODOI, C. K.; MATTOS, P. L. C. L. Entrevista qualitativa: instrumento de pesquisa e evento dialógico. In: SILVA, A. B.; GODOI, C. K.; MELO, R. B. (Orgs.). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. 2. ed. São Paulo, 2010. p. 301-323.
GRUENING, G. Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-25, 2001.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 37, n. 1, p. 43-74, 2012.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 119, p. 294-309, 2017.
HANNON, P. Why is the entrepreneurial university important? Journal of Innovation Management, v. 1, n. 2, p. 10-17, 2013.
HARRISON, R; LEITCH, C. Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, v. 44, n. 9, p. 1241-1262, 2010.
HOOD, C. A Public management for all seasons? Public Administration, v. 69, n. 1, p. 3-19, 1991.
HUFF, W. What is the Singapore model of economic development? Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 19, n. 6, p. 735-759, 1995.
IPIRANGA, A. S. R.; FREITAS, A. A. F.; PAIVA, T. A. O empreendedorismo acadêmico no contexto da interação universidade - empresa - governo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 8, n. 4, p. 676-693, 2010.
LEYDESDORFF, L. (2013). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations In: CARAYANNIS, E. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. New York: Springer, 2013. p. 1844-18516.
LIESNER, A. Education or service? Remarks on teaching and learning in the entrepreneurial university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, v.38, n. 4, p. 483-495, 2006.
LORENZ, C. If you're so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, v. 38, n. 3, p. 599-629, 2012.
MACHADO NETO, A. A evolução do conteúdo local. Sinaval, Rio de Janeiro, 29 jan. 2013. Seção Notícias da Semana.
MACULAN, A.; MELLO, J. A new regulatory framework for the relationship between university and industry: the Brazilian experience. In: SAAD, M.; ZAWDIE, G. (Eds.). Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and challenges. London: Routledge, 2011. p. 68-82.
MATHIEU, A.; MEYER, M.; POTTERIE, B. Turning science into business: a case study of a major European research university. Science and Public Policy, v. 35, p. 669-679, 2008.
MOK, K. The quest for global competitiveness: promotion of innovation and entrepreneurial universities in Singapore. Higher Education Policy, v. 28, n. 1, p. 91-106, 2015.
MORAIS, J. M. Petróleo em águas profundas: uma história tecnológica da Petrobras na exploração e produção offshore. Brasília, DF: Ipea: Petrobras, 2013.
NOVELI, M.; SEGATTO, A. P. Processo de cooperação universidade empresa para a inovação tecnológica em um parque tecnológico: evidências empíricas e proposição de um modelo conceitual. Review of Administration and Innovation (RAI), v. 9, n. 1, p. 81-105, 2012.
ORDOÑES, R. Após estaleiros, Cingapura quer investir em engenharia no Brasil. Jornal O Globo, Rio de Janeiro, 6 set. 2014. Disponível em: <http://oglobo.globo.com/economia/negocios/aposestaleiroscingapuraquerinvestiremengenharianobrasil13851316>. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2015.
OSBORNE, S. P.; GAEBLER, T. Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public service. Reading: Addison-Welsey, 1992.
PARANHOS, J.; HASENCLEVER, L. Is Industry–University Interaction Promoting Innovation in the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Industry? Industry and Higher Education, v. 25, n. 5, p. 397-407, 2011.
PARAYIL, G. From “Silicon Island” to “Biopolis of Asia”: innovation policy and shifting competitive strategy in Singapore. California Management Review, v. 47, n. 2, p. 50-73, 2005.
PARK, H.; HONG; LEYDESDORFF, L. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, v. 65, n. 1, p. 3-27, 2005.
PECI, A.; PIERANTI, O.; RODRIGUES, S. Governança e new public management: convergências e contradições no contexto brasileiro. Organizações e Sociedade, v. 15, p. 39-55, 2014.
PETERS, B. G.; PIERRE, J. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of public administration research and theory, v. 8, n. 2, p. 223-243, 1998.
PHILPOTT, K. et al. The entrepreneurial university: examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, v. 31, n. 4, p. 161-170, 2011.
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237-262, 2013.
RAPINI, M. S. O diretório dos grupos de pesquisa do CNPq e a interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: uma proposta metodológica de investigação. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, v. 11, n. 1, p. 99-117, 2007.
SARPONG, D. et al. Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 123, p. 142-152, 2017.
SCHMITZ, A. et al. Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 13, n. 2, p. 369–395, 2017.
STYHRE, A.; LIND, F. The softening bureaucracy: Accommodating new research opportunities in the entrepreneurial university. Scandinavian Journal of Management, v. 26, n. 2, p. 107-120, 2010.
SUTZ, J. The university – industry – government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, v. 29, p. 279-290, 2000.
TODEVA, E. Governance of innovation and intermediation in triple helix interactions. Industry and higher education, v. 27, n. 4, p. 263-278, 2013.
TOLOFARI, S. New public management and education. Policy Futures in Education, v. 3, n. 1, p. 75-89, 2005.
TORRES, A. et al. What are the factors driving university – industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, v. 38, n. 1, p. 31-42, 2011.
VILLASCHI, A. F.; FELIPE, E. S. Políticas estaduais para arranjos produtivos locais no Espírito Santo: evolução e perspectivas. In: CAMPO, R. R. et al. (Orgs.). Políticas estaduais para arranjos produtivos locais no sul, sudeste e centro-oeste do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: E-Papers, 2010. p. 257-288.
YE, F; YU, S.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix of university‐industry‐government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 11, p. 2317-2325, 2013.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
WONG, P.; HO, Y.; SINGH, A. Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 941-958, 2007.
WONGLIMPIYARAT, J.; KHAEMASUNUN, P. China ’ s innovation financing system : Triple Helix policy perspectives. Triple Helix, v. 2, n. 5, p. 1-18, 2015.
ZAWISLAK, P.; DALMARCO, G. The Silent Run: New Issues and Outcomes for University-Industry Relations in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Santiago, v. 6, n. 2, p. 66-82, 2011.
ZOUAIN, D.; PLONSKI, G. Science and Technology Parks: laboratories of innovation for urban development-an approach from Brazil. Triple Helix, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2015.