Leadership: revisiting and reframing the big questions on theory and practice

Main Article Content

Juliana Mansur
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7525-0691
Gustavo Tavares
Urszula Lagowska
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-8037
Liliane Furtado
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-8321

Abstract

This presentation is an introduction to the special issue of Cadernos EBAPE.BR on leadership. In response to recent calls for more rigorous leadership scholarship, the editors of this issue aim to showcase studies that take a novel approach to assessing the leadership processes. The articles selected demonstrate originality in terms of conceptual framing, methodology, and implications for theory and practice. The collection of four studies, three selected and one invited, allows readers to explore various topics and points of view. Overall, the articles approach leadership as a phenomenon that is not yet fully understood but can be explored from multiple theoretical and methodological perspectives. The editors of this issue also present their assessment of the state of leadership research in Brazil and offer suggestions for future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mansur, J., Tavares, G., Lagowska, U., & Furtado, L. (2023). Leadership: revisiting and reframing the big questions on theory and practice. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 21(6), e2023–0161. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120230161x
Section
Presentation

References

Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086-1120. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Bakker, A. B., Van Emmerik, H., & Van Riet, P. (2008). How job demands, resources, and burnout predict objective performance: a constructive replication. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21(3), 309-324. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800801958637

Bauwens, R., Denissen, M., Van Beurden, J., & Coun, M. (2021). Can leaders prevent technology from backfiring? Empowering leadership as a double-edged sword for technostress in care. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 702648. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702648

Bell, B. S., McAlpine, K. L., & Hill, N. S. (2023). Leading Virtually. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 339-362. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-050115

Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: a critical but appreciative review. The leadership quarterly, 15(6), 729-769. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.007

Carton, A. M. (2022). The science of leadership: a theoretical model and research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 61-93. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091227

Cavazotte, F., Hartman, N. S., & Bahiense, E. (2014). Charismatic Leadership, Citizenship Behaviors, and Power Distance Orientation: Comparing Brazilian and U.S. Workers. Cross-Cultural Research, 48(1), 3-31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397113494687

Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2007). Shared leadership: a post-heroic perspective on leadership as a collective construction. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 40-67. Retrieved from https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol3iss1/Crevani/CrevaniLingrenPackendorff_IJLS_V3Is1.pdf

Day, D. V., Riggio, R. E., Tan, S. J., & Conger, J. A. (2021). Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101557. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101557

DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D. (2018). Dirty data: the effects of screening respondents who provide low-quality data in survey research. Journal of Business and Pscyhology, 33, 559-577. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9514-9

Fischer, T., Hambrick, D. C., Sajons, G. B., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2020). Beyond the ritualized use of questionnaires: toward a science of actual behaviors and psychological states. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(4), 101449. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(20)30076-X

Fletcher, J. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647-661. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.004

Gardner, W. L., Lowe, K. B., Meuser, J. D., Noghani, F., Gullifor, D. P., & Cogliser, C. C. (2020). The leadership trilogy: a review of the third decade of the leadership quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101379. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101379

Gardner, W. L., Lowe, K. B., Moss, T. W., Mahoney, K. T., & Cogliser, C. C. (2010). Scholarly leadership of the study of leadership: a review of the leadership quarterly’s second decade, 2000-2009. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 922-958. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.003

Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433-448. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604

Gosling S. D., & Mason W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 877-902. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321

Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165-1185. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.009

Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: the critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485-500. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021452

Lanka, E., Lanka, S., Rostron, A., & Singh, P. (2020). Why we need qualitative research in management studies. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(2), e200297. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200297.en

Leigh, A., & Melwani, S. (2022). “Am I next?” The spillover effects of mega-threats on avoidant behaviors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 720-748. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1657

LePine, M. A., Zhang, Y., Crawford, E. R., & Rich, B. L. (2016). Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1036-1059. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778

Lietz, P. (2010). Research into questionnaire design: a summary of the literature. International Journal of Market Research, 52(2), 249-272. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2501/S147078530920120X

Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. F., Zehnder, C., & Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 19-40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003

Mackey, J. D., Ellen III, B. P., McAllister, C. P., & Alexander, K. C. (2021). The dark side of leadership: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research. Journal of Business Research, 132, 705-718. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.037

Malhotra, A. (2021). The postpandemic future of work. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1091-1102. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211000435

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11-33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002

Santos, M. M. D., Porto, J. B., & Borges-Andrade, J. E. (2021). Liderança: revisão da literatura brasileira e comparação com a produção estrangeira. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 21(4), 1750-1757. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2021.2.22196

Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 216-269. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216

Sobral, F., & Furtado, L. (2019). Post-heroic leadership: current trends and challenges in leadership education. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59(3), 209-214. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020190306

Stillman, J. (2023, May 31). The top 5 workplace trends on tiktok will make you worry about the state of employee-employer relations. Inc.Com. Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/the-top-5-workplace-trends-on-tiktok.html

van Knippenberg, D. (2023). The problem of research method informing research questions in leadership research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(1), 5-10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221130704

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Xi, M., He, W., Fehr, R., & Zhao, S. (2022). Feeling anxious and abusing low performers: a multilevel model of high performance work systems and abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 91-111. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2558

Zheng, X., Nieberle, K. W., Braun, S., & Schyns, B. (2023). Is someone looking over my shoulder? An investigation into supervisor monitoring variability, subordinates’ daily felt trust, and well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(5), 818-837. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2699

Zhu, J., Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2018). Shared leadership: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 834-852. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2296