The contradictions in rewarding business ethics: The Pro-Ethics case
Main Article Content
Abstract
How do discourses and practices of business ethics awards align, considering the plurality of ethical values and principles? To answer this question, we critically analyze the Brazilian empirical case “Pro-Ethics.” Pro-Ethics, a joint initiative led by the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) and Ethos Institute, is a symbolic action that promotes recognition of firms committed to preventing and combating corruption and that strive to make the corporate environment more integral, ethical, and transparent. We performed textual analysis through Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. As a result, we identified that the national integrity and business ethics system was imported from big global economic nations without considering the local reality and the cultural and social particularities that permeate trust relationships in Brazil. We also identified a progressive emptying of ethical and moral meanings in human relations in the capitalist context and the substitution of its content to cost-benefit relationships. Our analysis brings two main contributions. First, it adds to the discussion on business ethics awards, a field that academia has not explored in Brazil and is underdeveloped worldwide, with very few papers focusing on this subject. Secondly, it questions business ethics management practices, demonstrating the instrumental nature of the subject.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by Cadernos EBAPE.BR can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Aguiar, A. R., & Carrieri, A. d. (2016). “Water bag” and “blood sawdust” in the discourses of circus subjects. Organizações & Sociedade, 23(77), pp. 247-262. doi:10.1590/1984-9230774
Anderson, A. R., & Russell, E. O. (2011). Self-regulation: a strategic alternative for small firms? Journal of Business Strategy, 32(4), pp. 42-47. doi:10.1108/02756661111150963
Bowen, F. (2019). Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), pp. 257-272. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3635-y
Buske, K., Jentzsch, S., & Bechter, C. (2016). Is Self-Regulation Sufficient? Case of the German Transparency Code. Administrative Sciences, 6(1), pp. 1-12. doi:10.3390/admsci6010003
Carrieri, A. d., Couto, F. F., & Silva, L. O. (2018). A critical analysis of the 3º conference of the clean company. Revista da CGU, 10(17), pp. 948-960. Fonte: https://ojs.cgu.gov.br/index.php/Revista_da_CGU/article/view/58
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 216. doi: 10.1037/a0031021
Couto, F. F., & Carrieri, A. d. (2020). The Other Side of Compliance Systems and Codes of Ethics: A Foucauldian Perspective on Rule-Based Ethics and Corruption Control. Innovar, 30(78). doi:10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90299
Couto, F. F., Lopes, M. B., Araújo, M. G. F., & Vargas, C. C. (2022). Neoliberalismo, Ethos Empresarial e Corrupção nos Discursos da Família Odebrecht. Farol-Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, 9(26). doi: 10.25113/farol.v9i26.6379
Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2016). Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), pp. 627-641. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2450-y
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
Dunfee, T. W., & Werhane, P. (1997). Report on Business Ethics in North America. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(14), pp. 1589-1595.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Londres, Reino Unido: Routledge. Acesso em 14 de Novembro de 2017, disponível em https://disciplinas.stoa.usp.br/pluginfile.php/270695/mod_folder/content/0/ii.%20Norman_Fairclough_Analysing_discourse.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral Vision - Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), pp. 915-939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
Kovalenko, B. (2013). Continuum of Institutions of State Regulation and Self Regulation of Business Organizations. European Journal of Business and Economics, 8(1), pp. 13-19. doi:10.12955/ejbe.v8i1.122
Lodhia, S. (2015). Exploring the Transition to Integrated Reporting Through a Practice Lens: An Australian Customer Owned Bank Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), pp. 585-598. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2194-8
Machado, M. R., & Paschoal, B. (2016). Monitorar, investigar, responsabilizar e sancionar: A multiplicidade institucional em casos de corrupção. Novos Estudos - Cebrap, 104, 11-36.
Melo, I. F. (2011). Análise Crítica do Discurso: modelo de análise linguística e intervenção social. Revista Estudos Linguísticos, 40(3), pp. 1335-1346. Acesso em 14 de Novembro de 2017, disponível em https://revistas.gel.org.br/estudos-linguisticos/article/view/1257/807
Misoczky, M. C., Pereira, I. e., & Brei, V. A. (2009). Poder, Produção SOcial e Análise Crítica do Discurso: Aproximações em Busca de Maior Potência Teórico-Metodológica. Em A. d. Carrieri, L. A. Saraiva, T. D. Pimentel, & P. A. Souza-Ricardo, Análise do Discurso em Estudos Organizacionais (pp. 109-030). Curitiba: Juruá.
Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., Bosangit, C., Ferreira, C., & McGrath, M. (2017). Understanding Ethical Luxury Consumption Through Practice Theories: A Study of Fine Jewellery Purchases. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), pp. 525-543. doi:10.1007/s1055
Norman, W. (2011). Business Ethics as Self-Regulation: Why Principles that Ground Regulations Should Be Used to Ground Beyond-Compliance Norms as Well. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), pp. 43-57. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1193-2
Norman, W., Roux, C., & Bélanger, P. (2009). Recognizing Business Ethics: Practical and Ethical Challenges in Awarding Prizes for Good Corporate Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, pp. 257-271. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9846-5
Ormiston, J. (2019). Blending practice worlds: Impact assessment as a transdisciplinary practice. Business Ethics, 28(4), pp. 423-440. doi:10.1111/beer.12230
Perera, C., Auger, P., & Klein, J. (2018). Green Consumption Practices Among Young Environmentalists: A Practice Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), pp. 843-864. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3376-3
Ribeiro, M. C., & Diniz, P. D. (Jan./Mar. de 2015). Compliance e lei anticorrupção nas empresas. Revista de informação legislativa, 52(205), 87-105.
Rosa, A. R., Paço-Cunha, E., & Morais, C. A. (2009). Análise Crítica do Discurso como Análise Crítica das Organizações: Uma proposta teórico-metodológica com base na teoria Simbólica de Pierre Boudieu. Em A. Carrieri, L. A. Saraiva, T. D. Pimentel, & P. A. Souza-Ricardo, Análise do Discurso em Estudos Organizacionais (pp. 79-108). Curitiba: Juruá.
Rose, C. (2015). International anti-corruption norms: their creation and influence on domestic legal systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ruhnka, J. C., & Boerstler, H. (1998). Governmental Incentives for Corporate Self-Regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(3), pp. 309-326. doi:10.1023/A:1005757628513
Santos, L. L., & Silveira, R. A. (2015). By an Epistemology of Organizational Practices: The Contribution of Theodore Schatzki. Organizações & Sociedade, 22(72), pp. 79-98. doi:10.1590/1984-9230724
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction, practice theory. Em T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. v. Savigny(Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organisation Studies, 26(3), pp. 465–484. doi:10.1177/0170840605050876
Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On Organizations as they Happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), pp. 1863-1873. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071942
Souza, M. M., & Carrieri, A. d. (2014). A Análise do Discurso em Estudos Organizacionais. Em E. M. Souza, Metodologias e analíticas qualitativas em pesquisa organizacional: uma abordagem teórico-conceitual (pp. 13-40). Vitória: EDUFES.
Tourinho, M. (2018). Brazil in the global anticorruption regime. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 61(1), 1-18.
Windsor, D., & Getz, K. A. (2000). Multilateral cooperation to combat corruption: Normative regimes despite mixed motives and diverse values. Cornell International Law Journal, 33(3), 731-772.