Unveiling network learning as a strategy for interorganizational network change

Main Article Content

Julieta Kaoru Watanabe-Wilbert
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-5504
Andrea Valeria Steil
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-6532
Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-9495

Abstract

In response to shifts in the parcel logistics market during the 1990s, the global Express Mail Service (EMS) network underwent a decade-long transformative learning process that reshaped its procedures, structure, and network interpretations. Based on a retrospective qualitative case study, this research analyzes how a multilevel learning process contributed to the transformation of the EMS Network. The findings show that the EMS network, comprising over one hundred organizations, spontaneously split into two sub-networks (strategic and wide), facilitating a more efficient and systematic learning process. This division also underscores asymmetries in the extension and interaction dynamics of the two sub-networks. Coordination dynamics were central, embodied in the EMS Unit (EMSU), a hub that emerged from the learning process to become the network’s governance structure. This study contributes to network learning theory by advancing an asymmetric model, demonstrating that systemic transformation is possible without equal participation from all members when supported by effective governance. It also offers practical guidelines for service networks seeking to improve their performance through strategic learning and network coordination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Watanabe-Wilbert, J. K., Steil, A. V., & Dandolini, G. A. (2026). Unveiling network learning as a strategy for interorganizational network change. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 24, e2025–0023. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120250023
Section
Articles

References

Anand, A., Kringelum, L. B., Madsen, C. O., & Selivanovskikh, L. (2021). Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda. The Learning Organization, 28(2), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2020-0023

Azeredo, G., Burcharth, A., & Wegner, D. (2024). The impact of governance tensions on disaffiliation from interorganizational networks. Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060113

Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 92-124.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In P. M. Camic, H. Cooper, D. L. Sher, A. T. Panter, & D. Rindskopf (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.

Chang, L.-J., Chou, C.-Y., Chen, Z.-H., & Chan, T.-W. (2004). An approach to assisting teachers in building physical and network hybrid community-based learning environments: The Taiwanese experience. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(4), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.02.001

Coghlan, D., & Coughlan, P. (2015). Effecting change and learning in networks through network action learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(4), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886315601133

Costa, I., Bui, S., De Schutter, O., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2022). A network perspective to niche-regime interactions and learning at the regime level. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.001

Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337-360.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.

Dietrichson, L. G., & Bukh, P. N. (2021). Network learning and trust: A case study of a benchmarking network. Financial Accountability & Management, 37(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12239

Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gibb, J., Sune, A., & Albers, S. (2017). Network learning: Episodes of interorganizational learning towards a collective performance goal. European Management Journal, 35(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.09.001

Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170.

Halachmi, A., & Woron, A. M. (2013). Spontaneous inter-organizational learning. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 16(2), 135-164.

Holmqvist, M. (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganisational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001684

Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange, social capital, and learning. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109

Jones, O., & Macpherson, A. (2006). Interorganizational learning and strategic renewal in SMEs: Extending the 4I framework. Long Range Planning, 39(2), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.012

Knight, L. (2002). Network learning: Exploring learning by interorganizational networks. Human Relations, 55(4), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702554003

Knight, L., & Pye, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between network change and network learning. Management Learning, 35(4), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604048274

Knight, L., & Pye, A. (2005). Network learning: An empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Human Relations, 58(3), 369-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705053427

Kozar, O. (2010). Towards better group work: Seeing the difference between cooperation and collaboration. English Teaching Forum, 48(2), 16-23.

Krystallis, I., Kalra, J., & Locatelli, G. (2025). Orchestrating governance reconfiguration of inter-organizational project networks to address coordination failures. International Journal of Production Economics, 285, 109637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109637

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mozzato, A. R., & Bitencourt, C. C. (2014). Understanding interorganizational learning based on social spaces and learning episodes. Brazilian Administration Review, 11(3), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2014370

Mozzato, A. R., & Bitencourt, C. C. (2018). The process of interorganisational learning in the context of spatial agglomeration. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 24(2), 176-199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2018.094070

Peters, L. D., Pressey, A. D., & Johnston, W. J. (2016). Contingent factors affecting network learning. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2507-2515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.020

Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649-670.

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

Ratajczak-Mrozek, M., Hauke-Lopes, A., & Harrison, D. (2024). The evolution of contractual and relational governance mechanisms when platforms are actors in networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 114, 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.07.013

Rodríguez Goyes, D., & Sandberg, S. (2025). Trust, nuance, and care: Advantages and challenges of repeat qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research, 25(2), 330-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241246159

Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.

Scott, B. B. (2011) Organizational learning: A literature review. Discussion Paper #2011-02, Queen’s University, 1-24.

Sosniak, L. A. (2006). Retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 287-301). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796

Universal Postal Union. (n.d.). UPU website. https://www.upu.int

Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2000). Organizational learning, knowledge management, and intellectual capital: An integrative conceptual model [Working paper]. Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario.

Watanabe-Wilbert, J. K., Steil, A. V., & Dandolini, G. A. (2022). Network learning and interorganizational learning: A theoretical framework of relationship and interdependence. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 20(6), 863-881. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120210251x

Wegner, D., & Mozzato, A. R. (2019). Shall we cooperate, or shall we compete? How network learning episodes influence strategic decisions in strategic networks. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 18(3), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2019.100662

Wegner, D., & Verschoore, J. (2022). Network governance in action: Functions and practices to foster collaborative environments. Administration & Society, 54(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211024580

Westman, L., Luederitz, C., Kundurpi, A., Mercado, A. J., & Burch, S. L. (2023). Market transformations as collaborative change: Institutional co-evolution through small business entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32, 936-957. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3083

Winkler, M., Wegner, D., & Macagnan, C. B. (2023). The maturity of strategic networks’ governance: Proposal of an analysis model. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050134

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Yström, A., Ollila, S., Agogué, M., & Coghlan, D. (2019). The role of a learning approach in building an interorganizational network aiming for collaborative innovation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318793383