Construcción y validación de una escala de percepción de la corrupción a nivel ciudadano
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El estudio describe la creación y validación de la Escala de Percepción de la Corrupción (EPC), que tiene como objetivo evaluar cómo los ciudadanos perciben la corrupción. En la construcción y validación de la EPC, en una etapa cualitativa, el instrumento fue evaluado por expertos, seguido de un pretest. En la etapa cuantitativa, se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio, totalizando una muestra de 1075 casos. Finalmente, se sugiere una metodología para la aplicación de la EPC. La estructura final de la medida está compuesta por cinco dimensiones a nivel individual (conocimiento, comportamiento, reflejos, control y actitud), que posicionan al ciudadano como protagonista en el análisis del fenómeno.
Descargas
Métricas
Detalles del artículo
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Abreu, W. M, & Gomes, R. C. (2021, fevereiro). Shackling the Leviathan: balancing state and society powers against corruption. Public Management Review. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893802
Agenda 2030. (2014). A integração dos ODS. Recuperado de http://www.agenda2030.org.br/os_ods/
Amundsen, I. (1999). Political corruption: an introduction to the issues. Bergen Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute. Recuperado de https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/1040-political-coiTuption.pdf
Asian Barometer Survey. (2016). Asian barometer survey of democracy, governance and development. Recuperado de http://www.asianbarometer.org/pdf/core_questionnaire_wave4.pdf
Bagozzi, R. P., Y. I., Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
Bai, B., Liu, X., & Kou, Y. (2014). Belief in a just world lowers perceived intention of corruption: the mediating role of perceived punishment. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97075.
Bajpay, R., & Myers, C. B. (2020). Enhancing government effectiveness and transparency: the fight against corruption. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Recuperado de http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094/Enhancing-Government-Effectiveness-and-Transparency-The-Fight-Against-Corruption
Barr, A., & Serra, D. (2010, dezembro). Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11-12), 862-869.
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018, June). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1-18.
Bratton, M., & Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2016). Do trustworthy institutions matter for development? Corruption, trust and government performance in Africa. Recuperado de https://media.africaportal.org/documents/ab_r6_dispatchno112_trustworthy_institutions_and_development_in_africa.pdf
Brown, A. J. (2006). What are we trying to measure? Reviewing the basics of corruption definition In A. Shacklock, F. Galtung & C. Sampford (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 57-79). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Bugarin, M., & Bugarin, T. (2017). Ética & incentivos: devemos recompensar quem denuncia corrupção? Revista Direito GV, 13(2), 390-427.
Cavalcante, R. J. (2018). Legalidade: combate à corrupção e compliance na era digital. Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Função Pública, 7(20). Recuperado de https://dspace.almg.gov.br/handle/11037/31605
Collins, J. D., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89-108.
Controladoria Geral da União. (2009). A responsabilidade social das empresas no combate à corrupção. Recuperado de https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/integridade/arquivos/manualrespsocialempresas_baixa.pdf
Corruption Perceptions Index. (2014). The 2014 corruption perceptions index measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in 175 countries and territories. Recuperado de https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2014/index/bdi
Crawford, A. V. D. B., Levy, R., Lo, W. J., Scott, L., Svetina, D., & Thompson, M. S. (2010). Evaluation of parallel analysis methods for determining the number of factors Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(6), 885-901.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: theory and applications (Vol. 26). London, UK: Sage publications.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762-780.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological bulletin, 76(5), 378-382.
Gorsira, M., Denkers, A., & Huisman, W. (2018). Both sides of the coin: motives for corruption among public officials and business employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 179-194.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: pearson new international edition. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Independent Commission Against Corruption. (2018). Corruption and integrity in the NSW public sector: an assessment of current trends and events. Recuperado de https://apo.org.au/node/208446
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2020). Projeções e estimativas da população do Brasil e das Unidades da Federação. Recuperado de https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/index.html
Kaufmann, D. (2003, março). Rethinking Governance: Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy. SSRN Eletronic Journal. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.386904
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford publications.
Ko, K., & Samajdar, A. (2010). Evaluation of international corruption indexes: Should we believe them or not? The Social Science Journal, 47(3), 508-540.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (1998). Corruption in comparative perception. In A. K. Jain (Ed.), Economics of corruption (pp. 91-109). London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
Leal, R. G. (2013). Patologias corruptivas nas relações ente Estado, administração pública e sociedade: causas, consequências e tratamentos. Santa Cruz do Sul, SC: EDUNISC.
Lin, M. W., & Yu, C. (2014). Can Corruption Be Measured? Comparing Global Versus Local Perceptions of Corruption in East and Southeast Asia. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 140-157.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: a method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. Liberabit: Revista Peruana De Psicología, 25(1), 99-106.
Malito, D. (2014, fevereiro). Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices. SSRN Eletronic Journal. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2393335
Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 949-970.
Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2018). Grappling with the real politics of systemic corruption: Theoretical debates versus real-world functions. Governance, 31(3), 499-514.
Mcdonalds, R. P. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mousavi, P., & Pourkiani, M. (2013). Administrative corruption: Ways of tackling the problem. Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 178-187.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A., &, Dadašov, R. (2016). Measuring control of corruption by a new index of public integrity. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 415-438.
Neshkova, M., & Kalesnijaite, V. (2019). Corruption and citizen participation in local government: Evidence from Latin America. Governance, 32(4), 1-17.
Overman, S., Schillemans, T., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2020). A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector: gauging the account holder’s legitimacy and expertise. Public Management Review, 23(12), 1748-1767.
Pasquali, L. (2009). Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed Editora
Perumal, K. (2021, fevereiro). Corruption measurements: caught between conceptualizing the phenomenon and promoting new governance agenda? Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920983946
Sadek, M. T. A. (2019). Combate à corrupção: novos tempos. Revista CGU, 11(20), 1276-1283.
Shacklock, A., Sampford, C., & Connors, C. (2006). Introduction. In A. Shacklock, F. Galtung & C. Sampford (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 1-6). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Školník, M. (2020). The Effects of Corruption on Various Forms of Political Participation in Colombia. Latin American Policy, 11(1), 88-102.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological methods, 16(2), 209-220.
Transparency International. (2019). What is corruption? Recuperado de https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020: Full Source Description 2020. Recuperado de https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl
Transparency International. (2021). Índice de Percepção de Corrupção 2020. Recuperado de https://transparenciainternacional.org.br/ipc
Villarino, J. M. B. (2021). Measuring corruption: A critical analysis of the existing datasets and their suitability for diachronic transnational research. Social Indicators Research, 157, 709-747.
Warren, M. (2004). What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328-343.
Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2016). Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 60-74.
World Bank. (1997, setembro). Corruption and Economic Development. In World Bank (Ed.), Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank (pp. 8-23). Washington, DC: Autor. Recuperado de http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/cor02.htm
Yu, C., Chen, C. M., & Lin, M. W. (2013). Corruption Perception in Taiwan: reflections upon a bottom-up citizen perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, 22(79), 56-76.