Masculinidades hegemónicas como contrarresistencia en el contexto universitario

Contenido principal del artículo

Aline dos Santos Barbosa
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9745-0873
Marcello Romani-Dias
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9871
Heliani Berlato

Resumen

El objetivo del artículo fue analizar las facetas del ejercicio de las masculinidades hegemónicas como medio de contrarresistencia de los jóvenes frente al auge del colectivo feminista en el contexto universitario. Se desarrolló un estudio longitudinal, cualitativo e interpretativo, a partir de múltiples fuentes de datos, como entrevistas, documentos y artefactos organizacionales, que fueron analizados inductivamente, a partir de una codificación abierta, axial y selectiva. Como principales resultados de la triangulación de los datos se destacan: (i) las masculinidades hegemónicas se caracterizan por el liderazgo en los grupos estudiantiles, exaltación de la masculinidad y clasificación de las mujeres como subordinadas a los intereses de los muchachos; (ii) hay una resistencia del colectivo feminista, marcada por la lucha contra situaciones de machismo en el contexto universitario; (iii) hay una contrarresistencia masculina, con la intensificación de las acciones contra las mujeres, a través del acoso, la agresión, el vandalismo y la composición de canciones sexistas. El artículo contribuye a la discusión sobre género y resistencia, especialmente en el contexto organizativo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Barbosa, A. dos S., Romani-Dias, M., & Berlato, H. (2023). Masculinidades hegemónicas como contrarresistencia en el contexto universitario. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 21(4), e2022–0102. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120220102
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Arendt, H., & Kroh, J. (1964). Eichmann em Jerusalém. New York, NK: Viking Press.

Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15(3), 358-380. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015003003

Azevedo, L. H. (2016). Gênero, violência e universidade. In C. M. Cardoso (Org.), Universidade, poder e direitos humanos (pp. 117-140). São Paulo, SP: Cultura Acadêmica.

Bandeira, L. M. (2017). Trotes, assédios e violência sexual nos campi universitários no Brasil. Revista Gênero, 17(2), 49-79. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.22409/rg.v17i2.942

Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86-103. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08315102

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Carrigan, T., Connell, B., & Lee, J. (1987). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. In Brod, H. The making of masculinities (Cap. 3, pp. 63-100). London, UK: Routledge.

Coles, T. (2009). Negotiating the field of masculinity: the production and reproduction of multiple dominant masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 12(1), 30-44. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X07309502

Collinson, D., & Hearn, J. (1994). Naming men as men: implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work & Organization, 1(1), 2-22. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x

Connell, R. W. (1982). Class, patriarchy, and Sartre’s theory of practice. Theory and Society, 11(3), 305-320. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211660

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Políticas de masculinidade. Educação e Realidade, 20(2), 185-206. Recuperado de https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/71725

Connell, R. W. (2020). Masculinities (2a. ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2013). Masculinidade hegemônica: repensando o conceito. Revista Estudos Feministas, 21(1), 241-282. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2013000100014

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, UK: Sage Publishing.

Demetriou, D. Z. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: a critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337-361. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017596718715

Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22(5), 643-657. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993540

Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2018). Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: the politics of gender equality policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1-2), 111-129. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15282097548558

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: an introduction. New York, NY: Pantheon.

Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS TI. London, UK: Sage Publications Limited.

Glaser, B. G. (1994). More grounded theory methodology: a reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London, UK: Lawrence and Wishart.

Hakim, C. (1987). Research design: strategies and choices in the design of social research (n. 13). London, UK: Allen and Unwin.

Harrington, C. (2021). What is “toxic masculinity” and why does it matter? Men and Masculinities, 24(2), 345-352. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X20943254

Hercus, C. (1999). Identity, emotion, and feminist collective action. Gender & Society, 13(1), 34-55. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/089124399013001003

Hollander, J. A., & Einwohner, R. L. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 533-554. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5

Hyde, A., Drennan, J., Howlett, E., & Brady, D. (2009). Young men’s vulnerability in constituting hegemonic masculinity in sexual relations. American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(3), 238-251. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988308319730

Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2009). Resisting resistance: counter-resistance, consent and compliance in a consultancy firm. Human Relations, 62(8), 1115-1144. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709334880

Kessler, S. J., Ashenden, D. J, Connell, R.W., & Dowsett, G.W. (1982). Ockers and discomaniacs: a discussion of sex, gender and secondary schooling. Sydney, Australia: Inner City Education Center.

Kimmel, M. S. (1998). A produção simultânea de masculinidades hegemônicas e subalternas. Horizontes Antropológicos, 9(1), 103-118. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-71831998000200007

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: a call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557-584. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Linhares, Y., & Laurenti, C. (2018). Uma análise de relatos verbais de alunas sobre situações de assédio sexual no contexto universitário. Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento, 9(2), 234-247. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2018.n2.08

Martin, P. Y. (2016). The rape prone culture of academic contexts: fraternities and athletics. Gender & Society, 30(1), 30-43. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215612708

Medina, J. (2012). The epistemology of resistance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Mergaert, L., & Lombardo, E. (2014). Resistance to implementing gender mainstreaming in EU research policy. European Integration Online Papers, 18(1), 1-21. Recuperado de http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2014-005.pdf

Messerschmidt, J. W. (2019). The salience of “hegemonic masculinity”. Men and Masculinities, 22(1), 85-91. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18805555

Miles, M. B., & A. M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2a. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Moller, M. (2007). Exploiting patterns: a critique of hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 16(3), 263-276. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230701562970

Mumby, D. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: a dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 19-44. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905276558

Murnen, S. K., & Kohlman, M. H. (2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: a meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57(1-2), 145-157. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9225-1

Nogueira, C. G. D. M., & Miranda, M. H. G. D. (2017). A (re)produção das masculinidades hegemônicas. Revista Interritórios, 3(5), 1-21. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.51359/2525-7668.2017.234444

O’Connor, P. (2000). Resistance amongst faculty women in academe. Higher Education in Europe, 25(2), 213-219. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/713669252

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3a. ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publishing.

Ratele, K. (2015). Working through resistance in engaging boys and men towards gender equality and progressive masculinities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 144-158. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1048527

Rodriguez, S. L. S. (2019). Um breve ensaio sobre a masculinidade hegemônica. Diversidade e Educação, 7(2), 276-291. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.14295/de.v7i2.9291

Ruspini, E. (2000). Longitudinal research in the social sciences. Social Research Update, 28(20), 1-8. Recuperado de https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU28.html

Scott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Selbin, E. (2010). Revolution, rebellion, resistance: the power of story. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Silva, S. G. D. (2006). A crise da masculinidade: uma crítica à identidade de gênero e à literatura masculinista. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 26(1), 118-131. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932006000100011

Smith, J., & Johnston, H. (2002). Globalization and resistance. Transnational dimensions of social movements. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.

Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.

Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851-875. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843

Tildesley, R., Lombardo, E., & Verge, T. (2022). Power struggles in the implementation of gender equality policies: the politics of resistance and counter-resistance in universities. Politics & Gender, 18(4), 879-910. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000167

Tucker, L. A., & Govender, K. (2017). “Sticks and stones”: masculinities and conflict spaces. Gender and Education, 29(3), 352-368. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1156059

Verge, T., Ferrer-Fons, M., & González, M. J. (2018). Resistance to mainstreaming gender into the higher education curriculum. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 86-101. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816688237

Verge, T., & Lombardo, E. (2021). The contentious politics of policy failure: the case of corporate board gender quotas in Spain. Public Policy and Administration, 36(2), 232-251. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719852407

Vinthagen, S., & Johansson, A. (2013). Everyday resistance: Exploration of a concept and its theories. Resistance studies magazine, 1(1), 1-46.

Wapner, P. K. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics. New York, NY: Suny Press.