Articulando a Spinoza y Winnicott: aportes a las organizaciónes contemporáneas
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo explora la integración de la ontología de Spinoza y la epistemología de Winnicott como un marco teórico para entender la interacción dinámica entre organizaciones contemporáneas e individuos. Basándose en el monismo de Spinoza y el énfasis de Winnicott en el papel del entorno en el desarrollo humano, este marco ofrece un enfoque integral y centrado en el ser humano para el desarrollo organizacional. Destaca la importancia de la adaptabilidad, innovación y capacidad de respuesta en desafiar las nociones tradicionales de la estructura organizacional. Reconocer la interconexión de todos los aspectos de la organización y promover la colaboración permite a los responsables aprovechen la conectividad para la resolución creativa de problemas e innovación. Los espacios de transición, inspirados por Winnicott, permiten a los individuos participar en el pensamiento creativo y la experimentación, fomentando la innovación y el crecimiento personal. Crear un entorno de contención y apoyo se vuelve crucial para apoyar el bienestar de los empleados, el desarrollo personal y fomentar la inclusividad. Alinear las metas individuales y organizacionales promueve la toma de decisiones participativa y la comunicación transparente. La sensibilidad emocional y el compromiso afectivo nutren un paisaje emocional positivo que fomenta la creatividad y el bienestar. Empoderar la autonomía y mentalidades emprendedoras permite a los individuos actuar de manera emprendedora dentro de la organización. Incorporar flexibilidad en las estructuras organizacionales mejora la capacidad de respuesta y agilidad. Las oportunidades de aprendizaje y desarrollo continuo refuerzan el impulso de los individuos hacia la autorrealización. Medir y reflexionar sobre el impacto de las estrategias, junto con priorizar la participación de la comunidad y de las partes interesadas, mejora aún más la interconexión organizacional. Al incorporar estas recomendaciones, los responsables organizacionales pueden desarrollar organizaciones más adaptables, innovadoras y receptivas, considerando la interconexión de individuos, organizaciones y sociedad.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98-107.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2012). Critical management studies. In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies (pp. 1-34). Sage Publications.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76-87.
Anderson, J., & Martinez, R. (2020). Enhancing organizational development. Journal of Organizational Transformation & Social Change, 17(3), 311-329.
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace. Human Relations, 48(2), 97-125.
Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E. J., & Zerbe, W. J. (Eds.). (2002). Emotions in the workplace. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Austin, J., & Devin, L. (2017). Patagonia’s triple bottom line. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 15(4), 40-45.
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95.
Bacevich, A. (2020). The age of illusions. Metropolitan Books.
Bals, L., Hartmann, E., & Kurz, M. (2018). Geographic scope of international sourcing and supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 59, 1-16.
Barney, J. B. (2015). Becoming a global business leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 231-234.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. Yale University Press.
Bertrand, M., & Cummings, J. N. (2021). The organizing challenges of open source data and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 165-197.
Blackwood, R., & White, S. (2019). Spinoza’s ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Blom, L. (2016). Interactions between individuals and organizations. Organizational Studies, 37(9), 1281-1309.
Bratton, J. (2015). Work, society, and organizations. Routledge.
Brown, A. D. (2020). A defense of the value of temporality for organization studies. Organization Studies, 41(2), 167-187.
Brown, A. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
Brown, A. D., & Miller, K. D. (2021). Spinoza’s organizational framework. Organization Studies, 42(1), 5-29.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2021). Organizational learning reconsidered. Organization Science, 32(2), 314-331.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2022). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Wiley.
Carter, M. Z., & Wilson, D. C. (2019). Organizational development and change. In The Oxford Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 111-128). Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Harvard Business Press.
Chia, R. (1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Walter de Gruyter.
Coelho, D. O., & Henseler, J. (2012). Understanding the role of affect in organizational behavior. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363-389.
Crossan, M., Lane, H., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Harper Perennial.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 647-673.
Curley, E. (1996). Spinoza’s metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
D’Aveni, R. A. (2010). Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster.
Daft, R. L. (2007). Organization theory and design. Cengage.
Davenport, T. H. (2009). How to design smart business experiments. Harvard Business Review, 87(2), 68-76.
Davenport, T. H. (2023). Measuring and managing the impact of strategies on organizational performance. Harvard Business Review, 101(1), 88-95.
Davis, S. (2016). Patagonia. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 191-208.
De Dijn, H. (2002). Spinoza. Purdue University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Spinoza. City Lights.
Duhigg, C. (2012). The power of habit. Random House.
Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. Positive Organizational Scholarship, 3, 263-278.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming. Jossey-Bass.
Edmondson, A. C. (2022). The fearless organization. Wiley.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23-43.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., Knippenberg, D. V., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438-1446.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-116.
Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310.
Evans, D. S. (2017). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 33(3), 61-69.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and organization science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 237-298.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Gabriel, Y. (1999). Organizations in depth. Sage.
Galbraith, J. R. (2012). The future of organization design. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 3-6.
Garrett, D. (1995). Spinoza’s dualism. Cambridge University Press.
George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027-1055.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
Gerard, J. (2023). The inner world of organizational change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis. Duke University.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.
Gergen, K. J. (2021). Relational being. Oxford University Press.
Gielnik, M. M., Spitzmuller, M., Schmitt, A., Klemann, D. K., & Frese, M. (2012). I put in effort, therefore I am passionate. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 20-24.
Giridharadas, A. (2018). Winners take all. Alfred A. Knopf.
Graeber, D. (2015). The utopia of rules. Melville House.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124.
Grant, A. M. (2012). Giving time, time after time. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 589-615.
Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and take. Penguin.
Grant, A. M. (2020). The power of giving and receiving advice. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(2), 1-7.
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Green, D. F., & Brown, R. (2020). Spinoza. Routledge.
Grey, C., & Willmott, H. (2005). Critical management studies. Oxford University Press.
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2019). Multi-sided platforms. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). Building an innovation factory. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 157-166.
Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.
Henderson, R. (2020). Reimagining capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78.
Jacobides, M. G., & Billinger, S. (2006). Designing the boundaries of the firm. Organization Science, 17(2), 249-261.
Johnson, D. P., & Smith, K. K. (2018). The practice of ontology. Organization Studies, 39(11), 1605-1627.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, S. (2001). Beyond traditional quality control. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(3), 29-68.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2023). The wisdom of teams. Harvard Business Review Press.
Kets de Vries, M. F. (2014). The leader on the couch. John Wiley & Sons.
Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2016). The haier way. Wiley.
Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. (2016). Flourishing enterprise. Stanford.
Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017). Self-managing organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35-58.
Lewis, M. W., Marquis, C., & Jippes, M. (2021). Three decades of research on corporate social performance and corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(1), 1-7.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
Mantere, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). A strategy-as-practice approach to strategy research. Business Research Quarterly, 23(1), 5-21.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything. Penguin.
Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy. Penguin.
McLeod, S. (2017). Winnicott’s theory of play. Simply Psychology.
Miller, E. J., & Jones, P. (2021). Winnicott and organizations. Routledge.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Mooney, T. (2014). Philosophy, organization theory, and organization research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 98-108.
Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition. HarperCollins.
Morgan, G. (2023). Images of organization. Sage.
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.
Neck, H. M., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270-295.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human resource management. McGraw-Hill.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
Ollila, S., & Yström, A. (2020). Blurred boundaries and boundary work in business ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 106, 133-144.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design. Wiley.
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2016). Platform strategy. California Management Review, 58(4), 10-25.
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2017). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 64(7), 2888-2903.
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2019). A two-sided market analysis of provider investment in electronic platforms. Strategic Management Journal, 40(11), 1626-1655.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2017). Platform revolution. WW Norton & Company.
Parker, M. (2014). Critiquing critical management studies. Organization Studies, 35(8), 1045-1063.
Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive. Riverhead Books.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Free Press.
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2023). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 101(1), 78-85.
Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Pearson Education.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Sage.
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227.
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity. Oxford University Press.
Scott, A., & Gratton, L. (2020). The new long life. Bloomsbury.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline. Crown Business.
Sievers, B. (2009). Psychodynamic issues in organizational psychology. In S. R. Clegg & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 50-72). Sage.
Sinek, S. (2011). Start with why. Penguin.
Smith, M. K., & Johnson, A. R. (2019). Understanding the Nature of Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 40(6), 821-845.
Spinoza, B. (1994). Ethics. Hackett Publishing.
Stewart, M. (2019). The 9.9 percent is the new american aristocracy. The Atlantic.
Sturgeon, T. J., & Humphrey, J. (2005). Upgrading the global apparel value chain. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 377-393.
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy. MIT Press.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Timmreck, C., & Moeslein, K. M. (2020). Digital innovation management in ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119808.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation. Harvard Business Press.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89-104.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. Social Behavior, 5(3-4), 179-192.
Wheatley, M. J. (2022). Leadership and the new science. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
White, D. R., & Davis, D. (2018). Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 39(7), 925-945.
Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34(2), 89-97.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41(6), 585-595.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 64,1-276.
Worley, C. G., & Lawler III, E. E. (2010). Agility and organization design. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194-204.
Zhang, X., & Wu, W. (2018). Haier’s Rendanheyi model. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), 1-17.
Zhu, F., Ma, X., & Fu, H. (2020). Open innovation in a competitive market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), 1077-1106.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.