Estilo de liderazgo, sistema de medición del desempeño habilitador, actitudes directivas y rendimiento directivo: un análisis de métodos mixtos
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el efecto de los estilos de liderazgo de estructura inicial y consideración en el sistema de medición de desempeño (PMS, por su sigla en inglés) habilitador y en las actitudes de los directivos y sus efectos em el rendimiento de la gestión. Para ello, se aplicó una encuesta a los directivos de las mil mayores y mejores empresas incluidas en la lista de la revista Exame en 2020, lo que dio como resultado 219 encuestados. Los datos se analizaron mediante um modelo de ecuaciones estructurales de mínimos cuadrados parciales y un análisis comparativo cualitativo de conjuntos difusos. Los resultados muestran que los estilos de liderazgo (estructura inicial y consideración) no interfieren en las actitudes directivas, sin embargo, los empleados responden de forma diferente al estilo de liderazgo cuando se combina con los mecanismos formales de la organización para comunicar los objetivos y procesos estratégicos (PMS habilitador). Esto demuestra que el uso del PMS habilitador juega un papel de apoyoen las actividades de gestión y en el fortalecimiento de los mecanismos de control, contribuyendo a las actitudes directivas y al rendimiento de los directivos. Por lo tanto, el estilo de liderazgo tiene un efecto sobre el PMS habilitador, que colabora con las prácticas de control y las evaluaciones del desempeño, influyendo en las actitudes de los directivos y en su rendimiento. Las implicaciones prácticas y teóricas muestran que el estilo de liderazgo y el PMS habilitador alineados favorecen un ambiente de colaboración, fomentando la expresión de ideas, permitiendo uma mayor influencia sobre el trabajo y la percepción del desempeño.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR se compromete a contribuir con la protección de los derechos intelectuales del autor. En ese sentido:
- Adopta la licencia Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) en todos los textos que publica, excepto cuando hay una indicación de titulares específicos de derechos de autor y derechos de propiedad;
- Adopta software de verificación de similitud de contenido - Plagio (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adopta acciones para combatir el plagio y la mala conducta ética, alineado con las directrices del Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Más detalles del Código de Ética adoptado por Cadernos EBAPE.BR pueden ser vistos en Normas éticas y Código de conducta.
Citas
Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & Van Lent, L. (2010). Leadership and control system design. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.10.002
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393986
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
Artz, M., Homburg, C., & Rajab, T. (2012). Performance-measurement system design and functional strategic decision influence: the role of performance-measure properties. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.001
Bandura, A. (1977a). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Group & Organization Studies. In T. Boone, A. J. Reilly, & M. Sashkin. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall (Vol 2, 3rd ed., pp. 384–385). Group & Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A., Azzi, R. G., & Polydoro, S. (2008). Teoria social cognitiva: conceitos básicos. Artmed.
Bedford, D. S., Bisbe, J., & Sweeney, B. (2019). Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.010
Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002
Bido, D. S., & Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2), 488–536. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545
Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2006). Psychology theory in management accounting research. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 1, 113–135.
Birnberg, J. G., & Shields, M. D. (2020). Journal of Management Accounting Research at 30 years: reflections on its context, creation, challenges, and contributions. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-19-038
Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., … & Van Reenen, J. (2019). What drives differences in management practices? American Economic Review, 109(5), 1648–1683. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170491
Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological bulletin, 52(5), 396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045899
Burney, L. L., Radtke, R. R., & Widener, S. K. (2017). The intersection of “bad apples,” “bad barrels,” and the enabling use of performance measurement systems. Journal of Information Systems, 31(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51624
Cabral, JR, Horz, V., & Lunardi, MA (2024). Sistema de medición del desempeño habilitador: efecto sobre la motivación, las actitudes gerenciales y el desempeño gerencial. (2024). Estudios Gerenciales, 40(172), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2024.172.6436
Cäker, M., Siverbo, S., & Åkesson, J. (2021). Performance measurement systems, hierarchical accountability and enabling control. Accounting and Business Research, 52(7), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1940076
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(10), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
Cruz, A. P. C., Frare, A. B., Accadrolli, M. C., & Horz, V. (2022). Effects of informal controls and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(88), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202114660
Degenhart, L., Zonatto, V. C. D. S., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2022). Efeitos do capital psicológico e atitudes gerenciais na relação entre participação orçamentária e desempenho. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(89), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113790
Della Giustina, K. A., Gasparetto, V., & Lunkes, R. J. (2020). Efeito dos Estilos de Liderança nos Sistemas de Controle Gerencial e no Desempenho Organizacional. Revista Capital Científico, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-4153.20200004
Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. E., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta‐analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
Dias, M. A. M. J., & Borges, R. S. G. E. (2017). Performance and Leadership Style: When Do Leaders and Followers Disagree? RAM – Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 18(2), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v18n2p104-129
Ehmann, S., Kampkötter, P., Maier, P., & Yang, P. (2023). Performance management and work engagement – New evidence using longitudinal data. Management Accounting Research, 64, 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100867
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056314
Galeazzo, A., & Furlan, A. (2018). Lean bundles and configurations: A fsQCA approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2016-0657
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hartmann, F., Naranjo-Gil, D., & Perego, P. (2010). The effects of leadership styles and use of performance measures on managerial work-related attitudes. European accounting review, 19(2), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903384601
Isa, F. M. B., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2021). The Effect of Transformational Leadership Style on Employee Performance with Motivation Moderation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academics, 5(3), 265–271. http://kemalapublisher.com/index.php/JoMA/article/download/595/582
Kennedy, F. A., & Widener, S. K. (2019). Socialization mechanisms and goal congruence. Accounting Organizations and Society, 76, 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.01.004
Kieling, D. L., Zonatto, V. C. S., Degenhart, L., Machado, F. S., & Bianchi, M. (2023). Efeitos Cognitivos Mediadores do Compartilhamento de Informação Vertical na Relação entre Participação Orçamentária, Atitudes Gerenciais e Desempenho. BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2023.204.02
MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1963). Development of managerial performance: a research approach. Cincinnati: South-Western.
Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1965). The job(s) of management. Industrial Relations, 4(2), 97–110. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1965.tb00922.x
Martyn, P., Sweeney, B., & Lillis, A. M. (2024). Using emphasis frames to embed values in the interpretation of multiple performance criteria. Management Accounting Research, 66, 100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2024.100914
Merchant, K. A. (2006). O modelo do sistema de orçamento corporativo: influências no comportamento e no desempenho gerencial. Revista de contabilidade e organizações, 1(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v1i1.34700
Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management control system: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3rd ed.). Pearson education.
Mia, L. (1988). Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90017-7
Monteiro, J., Malagueño, R., Lunkes, R. J., & Santos, E. A. (2022). The effectiveness of value-and calculation-based management controls in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103156
Muñoz-Pascual, L., Curado, C., & Galende, J. (2019). The triple bottom line on sustainable product innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Sustainability, 11(6), 1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061689
Nani, D. A., & Safitri, V. A. D. (2021). Exploring the relationship between formal management control systems, organisational performance and innovation: The role of leadership characteristics. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 14(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol14no1.8
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative Comparative Analysis using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux, C. C. Ragin (Eds.). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 87–121). Sage Publications.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Simons, R., & Dávila, A. (2021). How top managers use the entrepreneurial gap to drive strategic change. European Accounting Review, 30(4), 583–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1792959
Souza, G. E. D., & Beuren, I. M. (2018). Impact of an enabling performance measurement system on task performance and job satisfaction. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29, 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201805850
Van der Hauwaert, E., Hoozée, S., Maussen, S., & Bruggeman, W. (2022). The impact of enabling performance measurement on managers’ autonomous work motivation and performance. Management Accounting Research, 55, 100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100780
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., and Betz, N. E. (2002), “A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors”. Journal of behavioral decision making, 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
Wouters, M., & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 488–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.002
Zonatto, V. C. D. S., Nascimento, J. C., Lunardi, M. A., & Degenhart, L. (2020). Efeitos da participação orçamentária em atitudes gerenciais, satisfação e desempenho gerencial. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(6), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020200047