A virada material nos estudos organizacionais: contribuições da Teoria das Justificações
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O objetivo deste ensaio é o de contribuir para o debate sobre a “virada material” nas ciências sociais e, mais especificamente, a respeito da sociomaterialidade nos estudos organizacionais, incluindo a espacialidade. Defendemos a proposição da Teoria das Justificações, que preconiza que os momentos de disputa vivenciados nas organizações não se reduzem apenas aos discursos, mas se valem de objetos e espaços para reafirmar sua lógica de ação. Para isso, abordamos a Teoria das Justificações aplicada ao estudo das organizações, com destaque para o engajamento de objetos, coisas e espaços que são acionados nesses momentos de disputa ou de prova, tão presentes nas organizações, contribuindo para os avanços dessa perspectiva de análise. Com isso, oferecemos uma perspectiva que se soma às pesquisas existentes sobre sociomaterialidade nos estudos organizacionais, em diferentes níveis de análise. Depois de discutir a Teoria da Justificação, suas lógicas morais, a sociomaterialidade e o espaço nos estudos organizacionais, mostramos estudos correlacionados e apontamos caminhos e reflexões para uma agenda de pesquisa sobre o tema. O debate em torno da temática auxilia na compreensão da interação da materialidade com a cognição, o discurso e o comportamento nas diferentes dinâmicas organizacionais.
Downloads
Métricas
Detalhes do artigo
Cadernos EBAPE.BR compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- Adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- Adota software de verificação de similaridade de conteúdo - plagiarismo (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Mais detalhes do Código de Ética adotado pelo Cadernos EBAPE.BR podem ser visualizados em Normas Éticas e Código de Conduta.
Referências
Amblard, H., Bernoux, P., Herreros, G., & Livian, Y. F. (2015). Les nouvelles approches sociologiques des organisations. Paris, France: Media Diffusion.
Amblard, M. (2003). Conventions & management. Paris, France: De Boeck Supérieur.
Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In L. H. Nelson, J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of Science (pp. 161-94). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: a review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Olive, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Chap. 5, pp. 133-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Boltanski, L. (2001). A moral da rede? Críticas e justificações nas recentes evoluções do capitalismo. Fórum Sociológico, 5(6), 13-35.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359-377. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cairns, G. (2002). Aesthetics, morality and power: design as espoused freedom and implicit control. Human Relations, 55(7), 799-820. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055007541
Callon, M. (2013). Qu’est-ce qu’un agencement marchand. In M. Callon, M. Akrich, S. Dubuisson-Quellier, C. Grandclément, A. Hennion, B. Latour, … V. Rabeharisoa (Eds.), Sociologie des Agencements Marchands (pp. 325-440). Paris, France: Presses des Mines.
Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2013). How matter matters: objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford.
Chiapello, E., & Gilbert, P. (2016). L’agence des outils de gestion. In F. X. De Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J. F. Chanlat (Eds.), Théories des organisations: Nouveaux Tournants (pp. 177-198). Paris, France: Economica.
Chiapello, E., & Gilbert, P. (2019). Management tools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cloutier, C., Gond, J. P., & Leca, B. (2017). Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations: An Introduction to the Volume. In C. Cloutier, J. P. Gond, & B. Leca (Eds.), Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 52, pp. 3-29), Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052001
Cloutier, C., & Langley, A. (2007). Competing rationalities in organizations: a theoretical and methodological overview. Cahiers de Recherche du GéPS, 1(3), 1-35.
Daudigeos, T., & Valiorgue, B. (2018). On objects and material devices in the organisational responses to institutional pluralism: insights from economies of worth. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 22(3), 121-128. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.7202/1060898ar
De Vaujany, F. X., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E., & Leca, B. (2019). Introduction: how can materiality inform institutional analysis? In F. X. De Vaujany, A. Adrot, E. Boxenbaum, & B. Leca (Eds.), Materiality in Institutions (pp. 1-31). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Vaujany, F. X., & Mitev, N. (2013). Introduction: space in organizations and sociomateriality. In F. X. De Vaujany, & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and Space (pp. 1-21). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Vaujany, F. X., & Vaast, E. (2014). If these walls could talk: the mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713-731. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0858
Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179- 215. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075288
Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. In O. Neurath (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (pp. 189-254). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Diaz-Bone, R. (2018). Economics of convention and its perspective on knowledge and institutions. In J. Glückler, R. Suddaby, R. Lenz (Eds.), Knowledge and institutions (pp. 69-88). Cham, UK: Springer.
Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Chap 12, pp. 237-258). Oxford, UK: Oxford Academic.
Gaudin, O. (2018). Pragmatist views of urban experience: sensorial perception in urban studies. Pragmatism Today, 9(1), 173-188.
Grenier, C., & Bernardini-Perinciolo, J. (2016). Strategic and enforced logics hybridization: an agency view within french hospitals and universities. In R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, F. O. Ramirez, K. VrangbÆk (Eds.), Towards a comparative institutionalism: forms, dynamics and logics across the organizational fields of health care and higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Holz, E. B. (2021). Sociomaterialidade e análise organizacional: da retórica à relevância. Organizações & Sociedade, 28(97), 241-64. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302021v28n9701PT
Jagd, S. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 343-359. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011412349
Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39(6), 631-648. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
Jarzabkowski, P., & Pinch, T. (2013). Sociomateriality is ‘the New Black’: accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting and repairing in context. M@n@gement, 16(5), 579-592. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0579
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145-1179. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1086/227128
Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersoon, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 243-75). London, UK: Sage.
Krieger, M. G. M., & Andion, C. (2014). Legitimidade das organizações da sociedade civil: análise de conteúdo à luz da teoria da capacidade crítica. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(1), 83-110. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122014000100004
Lafaye, C. (1996). Sociologie des organisations. Paris, France: Nathan.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (2012). Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede. Salvador, BA: EDUFBA.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Lorino, P. (2013). Management systems as organizational ‘architextures’. In F. X. De Vaujany, & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and Space (pp. 62-75). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Millar, R., Hall, K. & Miller, R. (2020). Hybrid organizations in English health and social care. In D. Billis, & C. Rochester (Eds.), Handbook on Hybrid Organizations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mitev, N., Morgan-Thomas, A., Lorino, P., De Vaujany, F. X., & Nama, Y. (2018). Managerial techniques in management and organization studies: theoretical perspectives on managerial artefacts. In N. Mitev, A. Morgan-Thomas, P. Lorino, F. X. De Vaujany, & Y. Nama (Eds.), Materiality and Managerial Techniques (pp. 1-38). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125-141. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep058
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). 10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211644
Pache, A-C, & Thornton, P. H. (2020). Hybridity and institutional logics. In M. Besharov, & B. Mitzinneck (Eds.), Organizational hybridity: perspectives, processes, promises. London, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Petani, F. J. (2016). Space and process: the organizational importance of what we leave behind (Tese de Doutorado). Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. B. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629-652. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
Reinecke, J., van Bommel, K., & Spicer, A. (2017). When orders of worth clash: negotiating legitimacy in situations of moral multiplexity. In C. Cloutier, J. P. Gond, & B. Leca (Eds.), Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 52, pp. 33-72). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052002
Robichaud, D., & Cooren, F. (2013). Organization and organizing: materiality, agency, and discourse. London, UK: Routledge.
Salminen, J. (2018). The spatial logics of justification – the case of a dispute over a car-free street in Tampere, Finland. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5(1-2), 66-89. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2018.1441044
Simpson, A. V., Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. (2015). Hybridity, sociomateriality and compassion: what happens when a river floods and a city’s organizations respond? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 375-386. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.03.001
Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: a narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325-346. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x
Thévenot, L. (2001). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an. Equipped “Humanity”. In J. Law, & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thévenot, L., Moody, M., & Lafaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont, & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628108.009
Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515- 552. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x