Challenges in comparative studies of public security funding in brazilian states
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines public security funding in five Brazilian states: São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Ceará, Pará, and Rio Grande do Sul. The study presents the budget structures of these states and aims to understand variations in public security spending, as well as
the feasibility of comparing such information across the states. The results reveal that public security expenditures are structured differently, reflecting unequal and complex governance systems where similar actors hold distinct significance in each state, notably the state police forces. Furthermore, in addition to the disparities between states, the analyzed budgets vary within a state over the
years. Consequently, comparing public security expenditures in Brazil becomes challenging, highlighting the need for standardized accounting practices among states and greater transparency in
monitoring relevant actions to combat violence. Lastly, the findings suggest the potential for comparing the correlation between state expenditures and their outcomes, analyzing efficiency and effectiveness.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors have the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The authors’ work is also licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), allowing sharing its content since acknowledging authorship and first publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to take on additional contracts separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal since acknowledging authorship and first publication. For example, the authors may publish the content in institutional repositories or as a book chapter).
Authors are encouraged to distribute the publication online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage, among others), as this can lead to improvements and increase impact and citation of the published work. For more information, please check The effect of open access.
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (CGPC) (Public Management and Citizenship Journal) is a journal committed to contributing to the protection of the author's rights. In this sense:
- Moral rights and rights of use of the article are secured to the author;
- It adopts the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license in all texts published;
- It uses similarity-detection software (iThenticate);
- The journal undertakes measures to fight plagiarism and ethical misconduct, in line with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
For more information, please see CGPC Ethics & Conduct.
References
Afonso, J. R. R. (2009). FPE: Rateio sem custeio. Observatório da Jurisdição Constitucional, 1(3), 1-9. https://www.portaldeperiodicos.idp.edu.br/observatorio/article/view/386
Afonso, J. R. R. (2016). Federalismo fiscal brasileiro: Uma visão atualizada. Caderno Virtual, 1(34), 1-24. https://www.portaldeperiodicos.idp.edu.br/cadernovirtual/article/view/2727
Almeida, M. H. T. (2005). Recentralizando a federação? Revista de Sociologia e Política [online], 24, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782005000100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782005000100004
Arretche, M. (2005). Quem taxa e quem gasta: A barganha federativa na federação brasileira. Revista de Sociologia e Política [online], 24, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782005000100006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782005000100006
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Rewards and regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 29(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00209
Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282581
Boutellier, H., & Steden, R. (2011). Governing nodal governance: The “anchoring” of local security networks. In A. Crawford (Ed.), International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance: Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings (pp. 461-482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974953.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974953.018
Costa, A. T. M. (2015). Estado, governança e segurança pública no Brasil: Uma análise das secretarias estaduais de Segurança Pública. Dilemas – Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, 8(4), 607-632. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/5638/563865503001.pdf
Costa, A. T. M. (2023). Das políticas de segurança pública às políticas públicas de segurança. In: A. T. M. Costa (Org.), Segurança pública, redes e governança (pp. 22-28). Editora Universidade de Brasília. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9786558461708
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. (2022). Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública, ano 16.
Johnston, L., & Shearing, C. (2003). Governing security: Explorations in policing and justice. Routledge.
Loader, I. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance. Social & Legal Studies, 9(3), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900301
Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2006). Necessary virtues: The legitimate place of the state in the production of security. In J. Wood & B. Dupont (Eds.), Democracy, society and the governance of security (pp. 165-195). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489358.009
Lopreato, F. L. C. (2018). Governos estaduais: O retorno à debilidade financeira (Texto para discussão n. 338). Instituto de Economia, Unicamp. https://www.economia.unicamp.br/noticias/governos-estaduais-o-retorno-a-debilidade-financeira
Lopreato, F. L. C. (2020). Federalismo brasileiro: Origem, evolução e desafios. Economia e Sociedade [online], 31(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3533.2022v31n1art01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3533.2022v31n1art01
Peres, U. D., Bueno, S., & Nascimento, T. (2022). Desafios no financiamento da segurança pública: Recursos estagnados e reforma do ICMS. 16º Anuário Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. https://forumseguranca.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/16-anuario-2022-desafios-no-financiamento-da-seguranca-publica-recursos-estagnados-e-reforma-do-icms.pdf
Peres, U. D., & Santos, F. P. (2020). Gasto público e desigualdade social: O orçamento do governo federal brasileiro entre 1995 e 2016. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais [online], 35(103), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/3510307/2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/3510307/2020
Peres, U. D., & Santos, F. P. dos. (2021). Descoordenação e desigualdades federativas no Brasil com a Covid-19: Análise da situação fiscal dos estados em 2020. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 26(85), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v26n85.83742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v26n85.83742
Rede de Pesquisa Solidária. (2022). Boletim No. 38 de 28 fevereiro de 2022.
Rezende, F. (2010). Federalismo fiscal: Em busca de um novo modelo. In R. P. Oliveira & W. Santana (Org.), Educação e federalismo no Brasil: Combater as desigualdades, garantir a diversidade (Cap. 1, pp. 71-88). Unesco.
Shearing, C. D. (2005). Nodal security. Police Quarterly, 8(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104267327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104267327
Stenning, P. C. (2000). Powers and accountability of private police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(3), 325-352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008729129953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008729129953
Stenning, P. C. (2009). Governance and accountability in a plural policing environment: The story so far. Policing, 3(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pan080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pan080
