Using expert judgments to rank 45 latin american business journals
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the results of a study on the perception of quality of Latin American business journals based on the judgment of relevant experts – senior professors with knowledge of Latin American research and journals. Forty-five journals were included in the study. The highest perceived quality scores were given to Academia (CLADEA – Uniandes), RAE (Fundação Getulio Vargas), and Innovar (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). When perceived quality was weighted by awareness, Academia, LABR-Latin American Business Review (University of San Diego – Coppead), and Innovar had the highest scores. Results complement a recent study by Ruiz-Torres, Penkova, and Villafane (2012) that focused on management journals published in Spanish. Analysis of results suggests that language and branding have an effect on the perception of journal quality. Implications for editors/publishers, tenure, promotion, research grant committees, and authors are provided.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
OLAVARRIETA, S. Using expert judgments to rank 45 latin american business journals. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 56, n. 3, p. 302–314, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/62017. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2023.
Section
Articles
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)