Educating qualitative researchers in management: Toward performative judgements

Main Article Content

Marcelo de Souza Bispo


The aim of this essay is to reflect critically on qualitative research education in doctoral management programs. The central idea is to offer a qualitative research education model supported by the concept of performative judgment. The notion of performative judgment draws upon Aristotle’s virtues of thought via Strati’s idea of sensible knowledge. The proposal focuses on a theoretical understanding of qualitative research education rather than prescribing pedagogical techniques or steps. The performative judgment education model is therefore open-ended and flexible and may fit in different doctoral program settings. It also helps to reveal the differences between the notions of training and education, showing how they can work together in the educational process.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
BISPO, M. de S. Educating qualitative researchers in management: Toward performative judgements. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 57, n. 2, p. 158–169, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020170205. Disponível em: Acesso em: 13 apr. 2024.


Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business—AACSB. (2013). The promise of business doctoral education: Setting the pace for innovation, sustainability, relevance, and quality. Retrieved from

Antonacopoulou, E. (2015). One more time: What is practice? Teoria e Prática em Administração – TPA, 5(2), 1-26. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed., Terence Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis, USA: Hackett Publishing.

Banerje, S., & Moreley, C. (2013). Professional doctorate in management: Toward a practice-based approach to doctoral education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 173-193. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0159

Baumgarten, A. G. (1735). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Halle in Magdeburgo: Grunert. [English trans., Reflections on Poetry, ed. K. Ashenbrenner and W. B. Holter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1954.].

Baumgarten, A. G. (1750-58). Aesthetica. Kleyb: Frankfurt am Oder(photostat, Olms: Hildesheim, 1986).

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. California, USA: Stanford University Press. Cassuto, L. (2015). The graduate school mess: What caused it and how we can fix it. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.

Chishtie, F. (2012). Phronesis and the practice of science. In E. A. Kinsella, & A. Pitman. (Eds.), Phronesis as professional knowledge: Practical wisdom in the professions. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

Cummings, S., & Tsoukas, H. (1997). Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies. Organization Studies, 18(4), 665-683.

Czarniawska, B. (2015). After practice: A personal reflection. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3), 105-114. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.19154/njwls.v5i3a.4836

Czarniawska, B. (2016). Reflexivity versus rigor. Management Learning, ahead of print, 1-5. doi:10.1177/1350507616663436

Dent, E. B. (2002). Developing scholarly practitioners: Doctoral management education in the 21st century. In C. Wankel, & R. Defillipi (Eds.), Rethinking management education: For the 21st century (pp. 135-155). Greenwich, UK: Information Age Press.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, USA: Herder and Herder.

French, R., & Grey, C. (Eds.) (1996). Rethinking management education. London, UK: Sage.

Griffiths, J., & Mack, K. (2011). Senses of “shipscapes”: An artful navigation of ship architecture and aesthetics. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(6), 733-750. doi:10.1108/09534811111175724

Khurana, R., & Spender, J. C. (2012). J. C. Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than a problem in organizational design. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 1-21. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 6486.2011.01040.x

Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Practitioner reflection and judgement as phronesis: A continuum of reflection and considerations for phronetic judgement. In E. A. Kinsella, & A. Pitman (Eds.), Phronesis as professional knowledge: Practical wisdom in the professions (pp. 35-52). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Kinsella, E. A., & Whiteford, G. (2009). Knowledge generation and utilization: Toward epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(4), 249-258. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00726.x

Kuhn, T. (1996 [1962]). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.

Macklin, R., & Whiteford, G. (2012). Phronesis, aporia, and qualitative research. In E. A. Kinsella, & A. Pitman (Eds.), Phronesis as professional knowledge: Practical wisdom in the professions (pp. 87-100). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Marx, R. D., Garcia, J. E., Butterfield, D. A., Kappen, J. A., & Baldwin, T. T. . (2015). Isn’t it time we did something about the lack of teaching preparation in business doctoral programs? Journal of Management Education, ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/1052562915616430.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). The world of perception. New York, USA: Routledge. Mowbray, S., & Halse, C. (2010). The purpose of the PhD: Theorising the skills acquired by students. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(6), 653-664. doi: 0.487199

Pakaluk, M. (2005). Aristotles’s nicomachean ethics: An introduction. Massachusetts, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). New York, USA: Routledge.

Schatzki, T. (2012). A primer on practices. In Higgs, J. et al. (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13-26). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). Performing phronesis: On the way to engaged judgement. Management Learning, 45(4), 377-396. doi: 10.1177/1350507614541196

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, USA: Guilford.

Strati, A. (1992). Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 568-581.

Strati, A. (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38(1), 61-77. doi: 10.1177/1350507607073023

Sutherland, I. (2012). Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workplaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning, 44(1), 25-43. doi: 10.1177/1350507612465063

Thomas, A. B., & Anthony, P. D. (1996). Can management education be educational? In R. French, & C. Grey (Eds.), Rethinking management education (pp. 17-35). London, UK: Sage.

Vaara, E., & Fay, E. (2012). Reproduction and change on the global scale: A Bourdieusian perspective on management education. Journal of Management Studies, 49(6), 1023-1051. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 6486.2012.01049.x

Vico, G. (1725). Principi di una scienza nuova. Napoli, Italia Mosca.

Warren, S. (2008). Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 29(4), 559-580. doi:10.1177/0170840607083104