Joining the sociomaterial debate

Main Article Content

Marlei Pozzebon
Eduardo Henrique Diniz
Nathalie Mitev
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Miguel Pina e Cunha
Bernard Leca


Integrative presentation on sociomateriality in management and organizational studies.


Download data is not yet available.






Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
POZZEBON, M.; DINIZ, E. H.; MITEV, N.; DE VAUJANY, F.-X.; PINA E CUNHA, M.; LECA, B. Joining the sociomaterial debate. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 57, n. 6, p. 536–541, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020170602. Disponível em: Acesso em: 27 feb. 2024.


Alcadipani, R., Dar, S., Gantman, E., & Yousfi, H. (2013). Challenging Anglo-Saxon dominance in management and organizational knowledge. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(2), 126- 129. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020150202

Alves, M. A., & Pozzebon, M. (2013). How to resist linguistic domination and promote knowledge diversity? RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(6), 629-633. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020130610

Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. doi:10.1177/0018726700539002

Anderson, W. (2002). Introduction: Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5-6), 643-658. doi:10.1177/030631270203200502

Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king time: Material entanglements and rememberings: Cutting together-Apart 1. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (pp. 16-31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge, US: Polity Press. Bhaskar, R. (1979, 2014). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London, UK: Routledge.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, US: MIT Press.

Boucher, G. (2006). The politics of performativity: A critique of Judith Butler. Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, (1), 112-141.

Callon, M. (1990). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 132-161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x

Carlile, P. R. & Langley, A. (Eds.) (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (Vol. 3). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1995). Narration or science? Collapsing the division in organization studies. Organization, 2(1), 11-33. doi:10.1177/135050849521002

Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649-678. doi:10.1177/1350508405055940

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2013). Materiality and Space: Organizations, artefacts and practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2015). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell? Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379-407. doi:10.1080/14759551.20 15.1103242

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2016). Introduction au tournant matériel. In F.-X. de Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J.-F. Chanlat (Eds.), Les théories des organisations. Paris, France: Economica.

Deetz, S. (2003). Reclaiming the legacy of the linguistic turn. Organization, 10(3), 421-429. doi:10.1177/13505084030103002

Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Escobar, A. (2010). Latin America at a crossroads?: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1-65. doi:10.1080/09502380903424208

Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.

Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In Sachs, W. (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, 2nd ed. London, UK: Zed Books.

Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley, US: University of California Press.

Feldman, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612

Goldman, S. L. (1989). No innovation without representation: Technological action in a democratic society. University Park, US: Pennsylvania State University.

Gomes, A. (2012). Alter-Native ‘development’: Indigenous forms of social ecology. Third World Quarterly, 33(6), 1059-1073. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.681491

Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge, US: Polity Press.

Harding, S. (Ed.). (2011). The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham, US: Duke University Press.

Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.

Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthumans. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.

Introna, L. D. (2013). Epilogue: Performativity and the becoming of sociomaterial assemblages. In F.-X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 330-342). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Irni, S. (2013). The politics of materiality: Affective encounters in a transdisciplinary debate. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(4), 347-360. doi:10.1177/1350506812472669

Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223-244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320.

Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications.

Jones, C., Boxenbaum, E., & Anthony, C. (2013). The immateriality of material practices in institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39A, 51-75. doi:10.1108/S0733- 558X(2013)0039A&B006

Kautz, K. & Jensen, T. B. (2013). Sociomateriality at the royal court of IS: A jester’s monologue. Information and Organization, 23(1), 15-27. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.01.001

Knorr-Cetina, K. K., Schatzki, T. R., & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, UK: Routledge.

Kreimer, P. (2007). Estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología en América Latina: ¿para qué?, ¿para quién? Redes, 13(26), 55-64.

Latour, B. (2007). Can we get our materialism back, please? Isis, 98(1), 138-142. doi:10.1086/512837

Latour, B. (2014). Technical does not mean material. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 507-510. doi:10.14318/hau4.1.033

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social – An introduction to actornetwork-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Lemonnier, P. (2017). Shall we just call them sociomaterial black boxes or take a peek inside? An anthropologist’s impressionist remarks. In N. Mitev, A. Morgan-Thomas, P. Lorino, F.-X. de Vaujany, & Y. Nama (Eds.), Materiality and managerial techniques: New perspectives on organizations, artefacts and practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lemos, M. (2017). Collaborative agency in educational management: Constructing a joint object for school and community transformation. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 555-566. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170604.

Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002

Lorino, P. (2013). Management Systems as organizational `architextures’. In F.-X. Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 62-95). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Martela, F. (2015). Fallible inquiry with ethical ends-in-view: A pragmatist philosophy of science for organizational research. Organization Studies, 36(4), 537-563. doi:10.1177/0170840614559257

Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning? Information and Organization, 23(1), 28-40. doi:10.1016/j. infoandorg.2013.02.001

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138

Perera, V. (2015). Engaged universals and community economies: The (human) right to water in Colombia. Antipode, 47(1), 197-215. doi:10.1111/anti.12097

Pickering, A. (2010). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.

Russo, P. T., & Guerreiro, R. (2017). A percepção sobre a sociomaterialidade das práticas de contabilidade gerencial. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 567-584. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170605

Turner, W., Bowker, G., Gasser, L., & Zacklad, M. (2006). Information infrastructures for distributed collective practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 15(2-3), 93-110. doi:10.1007/ s10606-006-9014-3

Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications.

Wasserman, V. & Frenkel, M. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22(2), 503-521. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0583

Willems, T., & van Marrewijk, A. (2017). Building collaboration? From colocation to dis-location, an ethnographic study in a railway control center. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 542-554. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170603

Shaffer, P. (2012). Post-development and poverty: An assessment. Third World Quarterly, 33(10), 1767-1782. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.728314

Villalba, U. (2013). Buen vivir vs development: A paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1427-1442. doi:10.1080/01436 597.2013.831594

Artigos mais lidos escritos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)