Joining the sociomaterial debate

Main Article Content

Marlei Pozzebon
Eduardo Henrique Diniz
Nathalie Mitev
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Miguel Pina e Cunha
Bernard Leca

Abstract

Integrative presentation on sociomateriality in management and organizational studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

 

 

 

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
POZZEBON, M.; DINIZ, E. H.; MITEV, N.; DE VAUJANY, F.-X.; PINA E CUNHA, M.; LECA, B. Joining the sociomaterial debate. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 57, n. 6, p. 536–541, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020170602. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/72491. Acesso em: 27 feb. 2024.
Section
Forum

References

Alcadipani, R., Dar, S., Gantman, E., & Yousfi, H. (2013). Challenging Anglo-Saxon dominance in management and organizational knowledge. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(2), 126- 129. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020150202

Alves, M. A., & Pozzebon, M. (2013). How to resist linguistic domination and promote knowledge diversity? RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(6), 629-633. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020130610

Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. doi:10.1177/0018726700539002

Anderson, W. (2002). Introduction: Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32(5-6), 643-658. doi:10.1177/030631270203200502

Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king time: Material entanglements and rememberings: Cutting together-Apart 1. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (pp. 16-31). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge, US: Polity Press. Bhaskar, R. (1979, 2014). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London, UK: Routledge.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, US: MIT Press.

Boucher, G. (2006). The politics of performativity: A critique of Judith Butler. Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, (1), 112-141.

Callon, M. (1990). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 132-161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x

Carlile, P. R. & Langley, A. (Eds.) (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (Vol. 3). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1995). Narration or science? Collapsing the division in organization studies. Organization, 2(1), 11-33. doi:10.1177/135050849521002

Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649-678. doi:10.1177/1350508405055940

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2013). Materiality and Space: Organizations, artefacts and practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2015). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell? Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379-407. doi:10.1080/14759551.20 15.1103242

de Vaujany, F.-X. & Mitev, N. (2016). Introduction au tournant matériel. In F.-X. de Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J.-F. Chanlat (Eds.), Les théories des organisations. Paris, France: Economica.

Deetz, S. (2003). Reclaiming the legacy of the linguistic turn. Organization, 10(3), 421-429. doi:10.1177/13505084030103002

Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Escobar, A. (2010). Latin America at a crossroads?: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development? Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1-65. doi:10.1080/09502380903424208

Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.

Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In Sachs, W. (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, 2nd ed. London, UK: Zed Books.

Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley, US: University of California Press.

Feldman, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612

Goldman, S. L. (1989). No innovation without representation: Technological action in a democratic society. University Park, US: Pennsylvania State University.

Gomes, A. (2012). Alter-Native ‘development’: Indigenous forms of social ecology. Third World Quarterly, 33(6), 1059-1073. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.681491

Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge, US: Polity Press.

Harding, S. (Ed.). (2011). The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham, US: Duke University Press.

Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1-16.

Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthumans. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.

Introna, L. D. (2013). Epilogue: Performativity and the becoming of sociomaterial assemblages. In F.-X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 330-342). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Irni, S. (2013). The politics of materiality: Affective encounters in a transdisciplinary debate. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(4), 347-360. doi:10.1177/1350506812472669

Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223-244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320.

Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications.

Jones, C., Boxenbaum, E., & Anthony, C. (2013). The immateriality of material practices in institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39A, 51-75. doi:10.1108/S0733- 558X(2013)0039A&B006

Kautz, K. & Jensen, T. B. (2013). Sociomateriality at the royal court of IS: A jester’s monologue. Information and Organization, 23(1), 15-27. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.01.001

Knorr-Cetina, K. K., Schatzki, T. R., & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, UK: Routledge.

Kreimer, P. (2007). Estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología en América Latina: ¿para qué?, ¿para quién? Redes, 13(26), 55-64.

Latour, B. (2007). Can we get our materialism back, please? Isis, 98(1), 138-142. doi:10.1086/512837

Latour, B. (2014). Technical does not mean material. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 507-510. doi:10.14318/hau4.1.033

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social – An introduction to actornetwork-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Lemonnier, P. (2017). Shall we just call them sociomaterial black boxes or take a peek inside? An anthropologist’s impressionist remarks. In N. Mitev, A. Morgan-Thomas, P. Lorino, F.-X. de Vaujany, & Y. Nama (Eds.), Materiality and managerial techniques: New perspectives on organizations, artefacts and practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lemos, M. (2017). Collaborative agency in educational management: Constructing a joint object for school and community transformation. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 555-566. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170604.

Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002

Lorino, P. (2013). Management Systems as organizational `architextures’. In F.-X. Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 62-95). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Martela, F. (2015). Fallible inquiry with ethical ends-in-view: A pragmatist philosophy of science for organizational research. Organization Studies, 36(4), 537-563. doi:10.1177/0170840614559257

Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning? Information and Organization, 23(1), 28-40. doi:10.1016/j. infoandorg.2013.02.001

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138

Perera, V. (2015). Engaged universals and community economies: The (human) right to water in Colombia. Antipode, 47(1), 197-215. doi:10.1111/anti.12097

Pickering, A. (2010). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.

Russo, P. T., & Guerreiro, R. (2017). A percepção sobre a sociomaterialidade das práticas de contabilidade gerencial. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 567-584. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170605

Turner, W., Bowker, G., Gasser, L., & Zacklad, M. (2006). Information infrastructures for distributed collective practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 15(2-3), 93-110. doi:10.1007/ s10606-006-9014-3

Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications.

Wasserman, V. & Frenkel, M. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22(2), 503-521. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0583

Willems, T., & van Marrewijk, A. (2017). Building collaboration? From colocation to dis-location, an ethnographic study in a railway control center. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 542-554. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020170603

Shaffer, P. (2012). Post-development and poverty: An assessment. Third World Quarterly, 33(10), 1767-1782. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.728314

Villalba, U. (2013). Buen vivir vs development: A paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1427-1442. doi:10.1080/01436 597.2013.831594

Artigos mais lidos escritos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)