Structural cartography for literature review: Revealing the underlying structure of a literature through a bibliographic atlas

Main Article Content

Joaquim Heck
Ion Georgiou

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a methodological study that established a specific method for historical and bibliographic analysis known as structural cartography for literature review. Structural cartography is a rigorous and interdisciplinary method that reveals the structure of a literature knowledge domain through the methodological notions found in historical research, bibliographic investigation, citation network analysis and cartography. This paper intends to provide readers with a broad understanding of the method of structural cartography for literature review and how to apply it. Finally, this article presents twelve ways of approaching a literature structure by using the bibliographic atlas elaborated by means of structural cartography for literature review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
HECK, J.; GEORGIOU, I. Structural cartography for literature review: Revealing the underlying structure of a literature through a bibliographic atlas. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 59, n. 2, p. 121–143, 2019. DOI: 10.1590/10.1590/S0034-759020190205. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/78675. Acesso em: 22 apr. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for social sciences. New York, NY: W.W.Norton & Company.

Akerman, J. R. (1991). On the shoulders of a titan: Viewing the world of the past in atlas structure (Doctoral thesis, Department of Geography, Graduate School, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA).

Alton-Lee, A. (1998). A troubleshooter’s checklist for prospective authors derived from reviewers’ critical feedback. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 887-890. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)90000-2

Beller, M. (1999). Quantum dialogue: The making of a revolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Boote, D., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003

Caldas, M., & Tinoco, T. (2004). Pesquisa em gestão de recursos humanos nos anos 1990: Um estudo bibliométrico. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 44(3), 100-114. doi:10.1590/S0034- 75902004000300008

Combs, J., Bustamante, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2010). An interactive model for facilitating development of literature reviews. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 159-182. doi:10.5172/ mra.2010.4.2.159

Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. (2014). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.

De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dunn, W. N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7(4), 720-737. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00891.x

Favaretto, J. E. R., & Francisco, E. R. (2017). Exploração do acervo da RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas (de 1961 a 2016) à luz da bibliometria, text mining, rede social e geoanálise. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(4), 365-390. doi:10.1590/s0034- 759020170407

Garfield, E. (1973). Historiographs, librarianship, and the history of science. In C. Rawski (Ed.), Toward a theory of librarianship: Papers in honor of Jesse Hauk Shere (pp. 380-402). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.

Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Georgiou, I. (2014). Seeing the forest for the trees: An atlas of the politics-administration dichotomy. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 156-175. doi:10.1111/puar.12163

Georgiou, I., & Heck, J. (2015). Longitudinal exploratory citation network analysis: An atlas-based methodology. Recuperado de https:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755389

Georgiou, I., & Heck, J. (2017). Problem structuring methods, 1950s- 1989: An atlas of the journal literature. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3077648

Goodman, E. (1971). Citation analysis as a tool in historical study: A case study based on F.C. Donders and mental reaction times. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 187-191. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(197104)7:2<187::AID-JHBS2300070209>3.0.CO;2-G

Grant, C., & Graue, E. (1999). (Re)viewing a review: A case history of the Review of Educational Research. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 384-396.

Harary, F. (1969). Graph theory. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London, UK: Sage.

Higham, J. (1989). History: Professional Scholarship in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hjorland, B. (1988). Information retrieval in psychology: Implications of a case study. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 6(3-4), 39-64. doi:10.1300/J103v06n03_03

Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., & Lovat, T. (2007). Examiner comment on the literature review in Ph.D. theses. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 337-356. doi:10.1080/03075070701346899

Holton, G. (1996a). The role of themata in science. Foundation of Physics, 26(4), 453-465. doi:10.1007/BF02071215

Holton, G. (1996b). Understanding the history of science. In G. Holton (Ed.), Einstein, history and other passions: The rebellion against science at the end of the twentieth century (pp. 103-121). Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.

Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8

Kessler, M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103

Mascena, K. M. C., Figueiredo, F. C., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2013). Clusters e APL’s: Análise bibliométrica das publicações nacionais no período de 2000 a 2011. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(5), 454-468. doi:10.1590/S0034-75902013000500004

Oliveira, G. C., Neto, Shibao, F. Y., & Godinho, M., Filho. (2016). The state of research on cleaner production in Brazil. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(5), 547-577. doi:10.1590/s0034- 759020160508

Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N., & Collins, K. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1-28.

Price, D. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515. doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510

Rosenhead, J. (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Siegler, J., Biazzin, C., & Fernandes, A. R. (2014). Fragmentação do conhecimento científico em administração: Uma análise crítica. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(3), 254-267. doi:10.1590/S0034-759020140302

Small, H., & Griffith, B. (1974). The structure of scientific literature I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.

Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Chapel Hill, NC: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Ziman, J. M. (1969). Information, communication, knowledge. Nature, 224(25), 318-324.