Occupational health and safety: Quality and determinants of its disclosure in sustainability reporting

Main Article Content

Catarina Alves
Maria da Conceição Ramos


This study analyzes the quality of occupational health and safety (OSH)
disclosures and their determinants, taking as a sample the reports of 101
European Union companies included in the official database of the
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), for the year 2018. Content analysis
allowed the construction of the quality index of companies OSH disclosures,
which was used later as a dependent variable on the one-way ANOVA and
multiple linear regression models. We have concluded that the quality of
OSH disclosures is, on average, 12 points out of 30, which is significantly
influenced by three determinants: the region of Europe, certification in the
OSH management system and the holding of an external guarantee in
reports. There is a higher quality in Northern Europe, followed by Southern
Europe, compared to Central and Eastern Europe and Western Europe.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
ALVES, C.; RAMOS, M. da C. Occupational health and safety: Quality and determinants of its disclosure in sustainability reporting . RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 62, n. 5, p. e2021–0101, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020220503. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/85955. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2024.


Araújo, A. O., & Ramos, M. C. P. (2015). Limitações dos relatórios de sustentabilidade para análises custo-benefício de ações sociais e ambientais. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 13(1), 132-155. doi:10.19094/contextus.v13i1.585

Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(3), 86-99. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00356.x

Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120-136. doi:10.1002/bse.506

Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685-701. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z

Cahaya, F. R., Porter, S., Tower, G., & Brown, A. (2017). Coercive pressures on occupational health and safety disclosures. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(3), 318-336. doi:10.1108/JAEE-04-2015-0032

Celis, I. L.-R., Bobadilla-Güémez, S. F. D., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., & Velasco-Balmaseda, E. (2017). Women’s occupational health and safety management: An issue for corporate social responsibility. Safety Science, 91, 61-70. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.019

Comissão Europeia. (2011, outubro 25). Responsabilidade social das empresas: Uma nova estratégia da UE para o período de 2011-2014. Brussels, Belgium.

Comissão Europeia. (2017, janeiro 10). Condições de trabalho mais seguras e mais saudáveis para todos: Modernização da política e da legislação da UE em matéria de saúde e segurança no trabalho. Brussels, Belgium.

Conradie, C. S., Smit, E. V., & Malan, D. P. (2016). Corporate health and wellness and the financial bottom line evidence from South Africa. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(2), E45-E53. doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000000653

Earle, H. A. (2003). Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management, 2(3), 244-257. doi:10.1108/14725960410808230

Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325-345. doi:10.1016/s0278-4254(03)00037-1

EU-OSHA. (2019a). European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks: How European workplaces manage safety and health. European Risk Observatory Report, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Bilbao, España. Recuperado de https://visualisation.osha.europa.eu/esener#!/en/survey/detailpage-european-bar-chart/2019/drivers-and-barriers/en_1/E3Q263_7/activity-sector/14/11

EU-OSHA. (2019b). Third European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks: First findings. Prevention and Research Unit, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Bilbao, España. Recuperado de https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/third-european-survey-enterprises-new-and-emerging-risks-esener-3/view

European Commission. (2017, janeiro 10). Ex-post evaluation of the European Union occupatinal safety and health Directives. Brussels, Belgium,

Evangelinos, K., Fotiadis, S., Skouloudis, A., Khan, N., Konstandakopoulou, F., Nikolaou, I., & Lundy, S. (2018). Occupational health and safety disclosures in sustainability reports: An overview of trends among corporate leaders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 961-970. doi:10.1002/csr.1512

Fabius, R., Thayer, R. D., Konicki, D. L., Yarborough, C. M., Peterson, K. W., Isaac, F., Dreger, M. (2013). The link between workforce health and safety and the health of the bottom line tracking market performance of companies that nurture a "culture of health". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(9), 993-1000. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a6bb75

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 31-38. Recuperado de http://www.ijbssnet.com/

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014a). Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behavior of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 244-254. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.034

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014b). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53-63. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5

Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective: A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1-35. doi:10.1002/bse.729

Fonseca, A. (2010). How credible are mining corporations' sustainability reports? A critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(6), 355-370. doi:10.1002/csr.230

Freitas, L. C. (2016). Manual de segurança e saúde no trabalho (3ª ed.). Lisboa, Portugal: Edições Sílabo.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). GRI 101: Foundation. Global Sustainability Standards Board. Amsterdam, Netherlands: GRI.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2018). GRI 403: Occupational health and safety. Global Sustainability Standards Board. Amsterdam, Netherlands: GRI.

Hart, S. M. (2010). Self-regulation, corporate social responsibility, and the business case: Do they work in achieving workplace equality and safety? Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 585-600. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0174-1

International Labour Organization. (2013). Safety and health at work: Hopes and challenges in development cooperation. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.

Koskela, M. (2014). Occupational health and safety in corporate social responsibility reports. Safety Science, 68, 294-308. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.011

Lopes, P. T., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange. The International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 25-56. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2006.12.002

Malan, D. (2017). Health metrics for corporate reporting. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (68), 118-134. doi:10.9774/T&F.4700.2017.de.00011

Malan, D., Radjy, S., Pronk, N., & Yach, D. (2016). Reporting on health: A roadmap for investors, companies, and reporting platforms. The Vitality Institute. Recuperado de https://www.vitalitygroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Vitality-HealthMetricsReportingRoadmap22Jan2016-1.pdf

Monteiro, S. M., & Guzmán, B. (2010). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185-204. doi:10.1002/csr.197

Montero, M. J., Araque, R. A., & Rey, J. M. (2009). Occupational health and safety in the framework of corporate social responsibility. Safety Science, 47(10), 1440-1445. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.002

Nagata, T., Nakata, A., Mori, K., Maruyama, T., Kawashita, F., & Nagata, M. (2017). Occupational safety and health aspects of corporate social responsibility reporting in Japan from 2004 to 2012. BMC public health, 17(1), 381. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4356-y

Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183-213. doi:10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00151-6

O’Neill, S., Flanagan, J., & Clarke, K. (2016). Safewash! Risk attenuation and the (Mis) reporting of corporate safety performance to investors. Safety Science, 83, 114-130. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.007

Organização Internacional do Trabalho. (2019). Segurança e saúde no centro do futuro do trabalho: Tirando partido de 100 anos de experiência. Geneva, Switzerland: BIT.

Pinto, A. (2017). Sistemas de gestão da segurança e saúde no trabalho (3ª ed.). Lisboa, Portugal: Edições Sílabo.

Pinto, A. (2019). ISO 45001:2018 – Gestão da segurança e saúde no trabalho: Guia prático. Lisboa, Portugal: Lidel.

Ramos, M. C., & Patrício, O. (2018). Educação e comunicação na prevenção, segurança e saúde no trabalho. In M. L. S. Rangel & N. Ramos (Eds.), Comunicação e saúde: Perspectivas contemporâneas (pp. 245-264). Salvador, BA: EDUFBA.

Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 103-118. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002

Ruiz-Frutos, C., Pinos-Mora, P., Ortega-Moreno, M., & Gómez-Salgado, J. (2019). Do companies that claim to be socially responsible adequately manage occupational safety and health? Safety Science, 114, 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.010

Rushton, L. (2017). The global burden of occupational disease. Current Environmental Health Reports, 4(3), 340-348. doi:10.1007/s40572-017-0151-2

Santos, G., Barros, S., Mendes, F., & Lopes, N. (2013). The main benefits associated with health and safety management systems certification in Portuguese small and medium enterprises post quality management system certification. Safety Science, 51(1), 29-36. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.014

Searcy, C., Dixon, S. M., & Neumann, W. P. (2016). The use of work environment performance indicators in corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2907-2921. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.081

Skouloudis, A., Jones, N., Malesios, C., & Evangelinos, K. (2014). Trends and determinants of corporate non-financial disclosure in Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 174-188. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.048

Takala, J., Hamalainen, P., Saarela, K. L., Yun, L. Y., Manickam, K., Jin, T. W., ... Lin, G. S. (2014). Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11(5), 326-337. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.863131

Tompa, E., Dolinschi, R., & Oliveira, C. (2006). Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplace-based interventions for occupational health and safety. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 16(3), 375-400. doi:10.1007/s10926-006-9035-2

Tsalis, T. A., Stylianou, M. S., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2018). Evaluating the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of occupational health and safety disclosures. Safety Science, 109, 313-323. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.015

Walters, D. (2005). The challenge of change for strategies on health and safety at work in the 21st century. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 3(2), 3-19. doi:10.1080/14774003.2005.11667659

Westerman, J. W., Rao, M. B., Vanka, S., & Gupta, M. (2020). Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 1-4. doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100742