Environmental disclosure level: A firms’ proactive or defensive posture?

Main Article Content

Maisa de Souza Ribeiro
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-1813
Edilene Santana Santos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0230-9357
Mariana Simões Ferraz do Amaral Fregonesi
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-4196
Lucelma Maria dos Santos Cunha
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-604X

Abstract

This paper investigated which theory best explains companies' motivation for environmental disclosure: the image theory (proxy: adherence to the Corporate Sustainability Index - ISE), or the legitimacy theory (proxy: materiality of provisions for environmental damage in the Balance Sheet - MatPA). Listed non-financial Brazilian companies with Environmental Disclosure Score (EDS) available on Bloomberg for the period 2010-2018 were analyzed. The panel data analysis indicated that among non-potentially polluting companies, ISE is significant to explain environmental disclosure and MatPA is not; among potentially polluting firms, MatPA is significant, but ISE is not. This suggests the coexistence of two antagonistic motivations for disclosure: the proactive strategy of
creating value and differentiation through environmental disclosure prevails (image theory) in non-potentially polluting companies, whereas potentially polluters primarily adopt a reactive attitude toward disclosure, seeking self-legitimation with stakeholders after causing damage to the environment (legitimacy theory).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
DE SOUZA RIBEIRO, Maisa; SANTANA SANTOS, Edilene; SIMÕES FERRAZ DO AMARAL FREGONESI, Mariana; MARIA DOS SANTOS CUNHA, Lucelma. Environmental disclosure level: A firms’ proactive or defensive posture? . RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 62, n. 3, p. e2021–0236, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020220311. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/86104. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
Section
Articles

References

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. doi: 10.1177/0149206311436079

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488. doi: 10.2307/1879431

Albitar, K., Hussainey, K. Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(30), 429-444. doi: 10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108

Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2016). The natural environmental strategies of international firms: Old controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 24-39. doi: 10.5465/amp.2014.0043

Barth, M. E., McNichols, M. F., & Wilson, G. P. (1997). Factors influencing firm’s disclosures about environmental liabilities. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 35-64. doi: 10.1023/A:1018321610509

Bebbington, G., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337-361. doi: 10.1108/09513570810863932

Bellamy, M. A., Dhanorkar, S., & Subramanian, R. (2020). Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure. Journal of Operations Management, 66(7/8), 895-932. doi: 10.1002/joom.1114

Chen, J. C., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2014). Initiating disclosure of environmental liability information: An empirical analysis of firm choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 681-692. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1939-0

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4/5), 303-327. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003

Coelho, F. Q., Ott, E., Pires, C. B., & Alves, T. W. (2013). Uma análise dos fatores diferenciadores na divulgação de informações voluntárias sobre o meio ambiente. Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 24(1), 112-130. Recuperado de https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/contabilidadevistaerevista/article/view/1290

Cormier, D, & Magnan, M. (2015). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431-450. doi: 10.1002/bse.1829

Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Velthoven, B. V. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality inlarge German companies: Economicincentives, public pressures orinstitutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3-39. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000339617

Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187-199. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510

Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101-130. doi: 10.1111/1467-6303.00031

Dye, R. A. (2001). An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1/3), 181-185. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00024-6

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate, social and environmental reporting: A review of literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77. doi: 10.1108/09513579510146996

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1/3), 405-440. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0

Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55-68. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4311-0_7

International Accounting Standard Board. (2001). International Accounting Standard 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. London, UK: IFRS Foundation

Kim, I., Ryou, J. W., & Yang, R. (2020). The color of shareholders' money: Institutional shareholders'political values and corporate environmental disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101704

Leal, P. H., Costa, B. M. do N., Oliveira, M. C., & Rebouças, S. M. D. P. (2018). Divulgação de provisões e passivos contingentes ambientais sob a ótica da teoria institucional. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 37(3), 37-54. doi: 10.4025/enfoque.v37i3.39477

Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, USA

Lourenço, I. C., & Branco, M. C. (2013). Determinants of corporate sustainability performance in emerging markets: the Brazilian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.013

McBrayer, G. A. (2018). Does persistence explain ESG disclosure decisions?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1074-1086. doi: 10.1002/csr.1521

Minutolo, M. C, Kristjanpoller, W. D., & Stakeley. (2019). Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083-1095. doi: 10.1002/bse.2303

Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Gonçalves, L. M. V. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance. The Brazilian case Sustainability, 10, 574. doi: 10.3390/su10030574

Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102-116. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007

Rosa, F. S., Guesser, T., Hein, N., Pfitscher, E. D., & Lunkes, R. J. (2015). Environmental impact management of Brazilian companies: Analyzing factors that influence disclosure of waste, emissions, effluents, and other impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.035

Rover, S., Tomazzia, E. C., Murcia, F. D.-R., & Borba, J. A. (2012). Explicações para a divulgação voluntária ambiental no Brasil utilizando análise de regressão em painel. Revista de Administração, 47(2), 217-230. doi: 10.5700/rausp1035

Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97-180. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8

Walden, W. D., & Schwartz, B. N. (1998). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16, 125-154. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00015-4