Supply chain sustainability reporting in the Global South: The role of funding

Main Article Content

Rodrigo Freire Lins
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-2348
Alice Erthal
Leonardo Marques
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-8191

Abstract

Companies deal with increasing pressure from multiple stakeholders to report not only their sustainable practices, but also their extended supply chain sustainability (SCS). However, the literature has paid less attention to how stakeholder pressures are shaped in the Global South characterized by institutional voids related to contracting, outsourcing, and weak legislation enforcement. This study maps which stakeholder pressures are associated with SCS reporting analyzing an unbalanced panel data of 220 corporate sustainability reports from 2016 to 2018 by Brazilian listed companies. Results show that long-term oriented shareholders and creditors, company size, and adoption of GRI guidelines are all associated with higher levels of SCS reporting, while public and regulatory pressures are not, offering support to the institutional voids rationale. In the absence or weakness of regulatory pressures, long-term funding sources and access to resources seem to step-in as associated drivers of SCS reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

 

 

 

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
LINS, R. F.; ERTHAL, A.; MARQUES, L. Supply chain sustainability reporting in the Global South: The role of funding . RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 63, n. 2, p. e2021–0427, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020230204. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/89181. Acesso em: 26 feb. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Ali, M. A. (2017) Stakeholder salience for stakeholder firms: an attempt to reframe an important heuristic device. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2819-6

Austin, R. D., & Upton, D. M. (2016). Leading in the age of super-transparency. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2016.7559059

B3. (n.d.). O que é o ISE B3. Recuperado de http://iseb3.com.br/o-que-e-o-ise

Barkemeyer, R., Preuss, L., & Lee, L. (2015). On the effectiveness of private transnational governance regimes-Evaluating corporate sustainability reporting according to the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.008

Benstead, A. V., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2018). Horizontal collaboration in response to modern slavery legislation: An action research project. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2286-2312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2017-0611

Bird, Y., Short, J. L., & Toffel, M. W. (2019). Coupling labor codes of conduct and supplier labor practices: The role of internal structural conditions. Organization Science, 30(4), 847-867. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1261

Brazilian Ministry of Economy. (n.d.). Radar SIT. Recuperado de https://sit.trabalho.gov.br/radar/

Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816

Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2013). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8

Chithambo, L., Tingbani, I., Agyapong, G. A., Gyapong, E., & Damoah, I. S. (2020). Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1666-1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2460

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). World class sustainable supply chain management: Critical review and further research directions. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 332-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2015-0112

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5

Fuente, J. A., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Lozano, M. B. (2017). The role of the board of directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 737-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155

Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3

García-Sánchez, I. M., Gómez-Miranda, M. E., David, F., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2019a). Analyst coverage and forecast accuracy when CSR reports improve stakeholder engagement: The global reporting initiative-international finance corporation disclosure strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1392-1406. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1755

García-Sánchez, I. M., Gómez-Miranda, M. E., David, F., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2019b). The explanatory effect of CSR committee and assurance services on the adoption of the IFC performance standards, as a means of enhancing corporate transparency. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(5), 773-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2018-0261

García‐Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., Aibar‐Guzmán, B., & Aibar‐Guzmán, C. (2020). Do institutional investors drive corporate transparency regarding business contribution to the sustainable development goals? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 2019-2036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2485

Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). Sustainability topics for sectors: What do stakeholders want to know? GRI Research & Development Series. Recuperado de https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/

Gold, S., Kunz, N., & Reiner, G. (2017). Sustainable global agrifood supply chains: exploring the barriers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(2), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12440

Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542

Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3

Huq, F. A., & Stevenson, M. (2018). Implementing socially sustainable practices in challenging institutional contexts: Building theory from seven developing country supplier cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 0(0), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3951-x

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2019). Características adicionais do mercado de trabalho: 2018. Recuperado de https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101694

Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente. (n.d.). Consulta de autuações ambientais e embargos. Recuperado de https://servicos.ibama.gov.br/ctf/publico/areasembargadas/ConsultaPublicaAreasEmbargadas.php

Islam, M. A., Jain, A., & Thomson, D. (2016). Does the global reporting initiative influence sustainability disclosures in Asia-Pacific banks? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 23(3), 298-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2016.1174625

Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.248

Kalu, J. U., Buang, A., & Aliagha, G. U. (2016). Determinants of voluntary carbon disclosure in the corporate real estate sector of Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.011

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75, 41-51. Recuperado de https://hbr.org/1997/07/why-focused-strategies-may-be-wrong-for-emerging-markets

Kim, S., Wagner, S. M., Colicchia, C. (2019) The impact of supplier sustainability risk on shareholder value. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12188

Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2017). Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.153

Lo, C. K. Y., Pagell, M., Fan, D., Wiengarten, F., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2014). OHSAS 18001 certification and operating performance: The role of complexity and coupling. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.04.004

Maas, S., Schuster, T., & Hartmann, E. (2018). Stakeholder pressures, environmental practice adoption and economic performance in the German third-party logistics industry: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Economics, 88(2), 167-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0872-6

Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018, February). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, 57, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002

Marques, L. (2019). Sustainable supply network management: A systematic literature review from a knowledge perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(6), 1164-1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2017-0329

Marques, L., Erthal, A., Schott, C. S. C. M., & Morais, D. (2021). Inhospitable accessibility and blurred liability: Institutional voids in an emerging economy preventing supply network transparency. Brazilian Administration Review, 18(2). 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2021200078

Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Harrigan, F. (2016). What’s your strategy for supply chain disclosure? MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(2), 36-45. Recuperado de http://mitsmr.com/1NlH2w0

Meixell, M. J., & Luoma, P. (2015). Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management: A systematic review. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 45(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0155

Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x

Miniaoui, Z., Chibani, F., & Hussainey, K. (2019). The impact of country-level institutional differences on corporate social responsibility disclosure engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1307-1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1748

Okongwu, U., Morimoto, R., & Lauras, M. (2013). The maturity of supply chain sustainability disclosure from a continuous improvement perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(8), 827-855. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2013-0032

Rashidfarokhi, A., Toivonen, S., & Viitanen, K. (2018). Sustainability reporting in the nordic real estate companies: Empirical evidence from Finland. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2018.321

Reimsbach, D., Schiemann, F., Hahn, R., & Schmiedchen, E. (2019). In the eyes of the beholder: Experimental evidence on the contested nature of materiality in sustainability reporting. Organization and Environment. 33(4), 624–651 https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619875436

Reporter Brasil. (n.d.). Trabalho escravo existe no Brasil: Saiba o que é. Recuperado de http://escravonempensar.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Folder_Trabalho-escravo-existe_Assistencia-Social_atualizado_web.pdf

Schmidt, C. G., Foerstl, K., & Schaltenbrand, B. (2017). The supply chain position paradox: Green practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 3-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12113

Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.025

SmartLab MPT/OIT. (2017). Observatorio digital do trabalho escravo no Brasil (Vol. 1). Recuperado de https://smartlabbr.org/escravo-v1/

Sodhi, M. M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2019). Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2946-2959. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13115

Stevenson, M., & Cole, R. (2018). Modern slavery in supply chains: A secondary data analysis of detection, remediation and disclosure. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(3), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-11-2017-0382

Svensson, G., Ferro, C., Hogevold, N., Padin, C., & Varela, J. C. S. (2018). Developing a theory of focal company business sustainability efforts in connection with supply chain stakeholders. Supply Chain Management, 23(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0461

Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856657

Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03184.x

The Minderoo Foundation. (2018). The global slavery index. Recuperado de https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/resources/downloads/

Tran, M., & Beddewela, E. (2020). Does context matter for sustainability disclosure? Institutional factors in Southeast Asia. Business Ethics, 29(2), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12265

Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2019). How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1591-1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1850

Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001

Yadava, R. N., & Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 Guidelines for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and private Indian companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1

Yunus, S., Elijido-ten, E. O., & Abhayawansa, S. (2020). Impact of stakeholder pressure on the adoption of carbon management strategies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1189-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0135