The role of science and technology parks in the growth of sales of Portuguese firms

Main Article Content

Júlio Paulo da Silva Martins
María Jesús Rodríguez-Gulías
David Rodeiro-Pazos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-2676
Raul Rios-Rodríguez
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-1875

Abstract

The role of science and technology parks (STPs) in economic development, and in particular in the growth of the firms, has received considerable attention from government policies in different countries. However, there is no consensus in the literature on whether the location in these parks has positive effects on firms’ sales growth. This paper aims to broaden the discussion on the effects of STPs, providing new empirical evidence. With this purpose, we use a sample of 553 Portuguese companies located in these infrastructures and a control sample of the same size. We use the Propensity Score Matching procedure to match the samples and the analysis is carried out using the Generalized Method of Moments in dynamic panel data. The empirical analysis does not prove any statistically significant effect of the location of the firms in science and technology parks on their growth in sales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
MARTINS, J. P. da S.; RODRÍGUEZ-GULÍAS, M. J.; RODEIRO-PAZOS, D.; RIOS-RODRÍGUEZ, R. The role of science and technology parks in the growth of sales of Portuguese firms. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 63, n. 6, p. e2023–0017, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020230601. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/89850. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2022). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: A literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Online first, 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09949-7

Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2019). Science and technology parks: A study of value creation for park tenants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1256-1272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9

Amezcua, A. S. (2010). Boon or boondoggle? Business incubation as entrepreneurship policy. Syracuse University.

Amirahmadi, H., & Saff, G. (1993). Science parks: A critical assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 8(2), 107-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088541229300800201

Arauzo-Carod, J.-M., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). The role of science and technology parks as firm growth boosters: An empirical analysis in Catalonia. Regional Studies, 52(5), 645-658.: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1447098

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economics Studies, 58(2), 277-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0200200403

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Alegre, I., & Guerrero, A. (2020). Mission statements and performance: An exploratory study of science parks. Long Range Planning, 53(5), 101932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101932

Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator: Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005

Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90010-O

Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

Chan, K.-Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, M. W. (2010). Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: The innovation hub case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 207-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320903498546

Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0

Correia, A. M. M., Veiga, C. P. da, Senff, C. O., & Duclós, L. C. (2021). Analysis of the maturity level of business processes for science and technology parks. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244021103730

Corrocher, N., Lamperti, F., & Mavilia, R. (2019). Do science parks sustain or trigger innovation? Empirical evidence from Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 140-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.005

Cricelli, L., Gastaldi, M., & Levialdi, N. (1997). A system of science and technology parks for the Rome area. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(2), 140-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001653

Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982

Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0

Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2017a). The effect of science and technology parks on a firm’s performance: A dynamic approach over time. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(3), 413-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0481-5

Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2017b). The effect of science and technology parks on firms’ performance: How can firms benefit most under economic downturns? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(10), 1153-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1274390

European Commission. (2013). Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks: An advice and guidance report on good practice. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/stp_report_en.pdf

Eurostat. (2020). Annex 3: High-tech aggregation by NACE Rev.2. Eurostat indicators on high-tech industry and knowledge: Intensive services. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf

Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs: Location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd

Fikirkoca, A., & Saritas, O. (2012). Foresight for science parks: The case of Ankara University. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(10), 1071-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.723688

Hallin, D. C. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 583-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2098589

Hannan, M. T. (1998). Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 126-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210004

Hansen, J. A. (1998). Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 37-44. doi?

Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 957-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9522-3

Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Shelton, T. L. (2020). The regional economic impacts of university research and science parks. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 42-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0566-5

Howard, E. S., & Link, A. N. (2019). An oasis of knowledge: The early history of Gateway University Research Park. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10, 1037-1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0513-x

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2012, maio 12). Sociedades em setores de alta e média-alta tecnologia: Qual a sua importância relativa? Instituto Nacional de Estatística—Statistics Portugal. https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_destaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=216873952&DESTAQUESmodo=2

International Association of Science Parks. (2016). IASP General Survey: Science and technology parks and areas of innovation throughout the world. International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation.

Kim, H.-Y., & Jung, C. M. (2010). Does a technology incubator work in the regional economy? Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(3), 273-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000019

Lamperti, F., Mavilia, R., & Castellini, S. (2017). The role of science parks: A puzzle of growth, innovation and R&D investments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 158-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9455-2

Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x

Liberati, D., Marinucci, M., & Tanzi, G. M. (2016). Science and technology parks in Italy: Main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 694-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9397-8

Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms: Assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off science parks. Omega, 30(3), 143-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00023-3

Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden: Industrial renewal and development? R&D Management, 31(3), 309-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00219

Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6

Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23(1), 51-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00086-4

Meseguer-Martinez, A., Popa, S., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2021). The instrumentation of science parks: An integrative framework of enabling factors. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 24-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0264

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. (2021). Parques tecnológicos do Brasil. https://anprotec.org.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ParquesTecnologicosBrasil-2021-Final-vr.pdf

Monck, C. S. P., Porter, R. B., Quintas, P. R., Storey, D. J., & Wynarczyk, P. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. Croom Helm.

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ribeiro, J. de A., Ladeira, M. B., Faria, A. F. de, & Barbosa, M. W. (2021). A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59, 101612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101612

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrics, 70(1), 41-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2335942

Silva, S. E., Venâncio, A., Silva, J. R., & Gonçalves, C. A. (2020). Open innovation in science parks: The role of public policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119844

Spithoven, A., & Knockaert, M. (2011). The role of business centres in firms’ networking capabilities and performance. Science and Public Policy, 38(7), 569-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13070021633125

Stokan, E., Thompson, L., & Mahu, R. J. (2015). Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 317-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891242415597065

Vásquez-Urriago, Á. R., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego-Rico, A. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1), 137-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006

Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1994). An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom. HMSO.

Woolley, J. L., & MacGregor. (2022). The influence of incubator and accelerator participation on nanotechnology venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1717-1755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10422587211024510

Xue, C., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Peer effects in R&D investments: Evidence from China’s science and technology parks programs. Applied Economics Letters, 30(1), 43-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1971616

Yan, M.-R., Yan, H., Zhan, L., Yan, X., & Xu, M. (2020). Evaluation of technological innovations and the industrial ecosystem of science parks in Shanghai: An empirical study. Science, Technology and Society, 25(3), 482-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971721820912906

Zhou, H., & Wit, G. de. (2009). Determinants and dimensions of firm growth. Scales EIM Research Reports (H200903). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443897