A scientometric analysis of institutions in the international business research

Main Article Content

Sílvio Luís de Vasconcellos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9986-679X
Jefferson Marlon Monticelli
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-7090
André Moraes dos Santos
Christian Falaster
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-4475

Abstract

This paper explores the co-evolution of international business studies and institutions, employing a scientometric approach and bibliometric review on the application of institutional concepts in international business studies, outlining a research agenda. We compiled a database of 3,520 articles and conducted a scientometric analysis to examine the evolution of the term “institutions” in international business in ABSranked
journals. Our findings show that (1) over the past two decades, there has been a shift in the use of the term institutions from a political and economic connotation to a sociological perspective to explain how firms adopt strategies, make decisions, and address intra-national
problems during the internationalization process; (2) traditional approaches were found to be insufficient in explaining context-dependent events that affect international business; and (3) China has emerged as a critical player in international business studies, which has helped to redirect the focus of institutions from political and economic aspects to the sociological context. Finally, we propose an agenda for future research, highlighting potential pitfalls and remedies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
DE VASCONCELLOS, S. L.; MONTICELLI, J. M.; DOS SANTOS, A. M.; FALASTER, C. A scientometric analysis of institutions in the international business research. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. e2022–0310, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020240106. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/90550. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2024.
Section
Articles

References

Abramo, G. (2018). Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001

Agarwal, S. (1994). Socio-Cultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 2(2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9400200205

Aguilera, R. V., Flores, R., & Kim, J. U. (2015). Re-examining regional borders and the multinational enterprise. The Multinational Business Review, 23(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2015-0027

Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. (2019). The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0201-5

Association of Business Schools. (2018). Academic Journal Guide. https://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~tmattson/AJG 2018 Journal Guide.pdf

Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Institutional Polycentrism, Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks, and New Venture Growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0095

Bhardwaj, R. K. (2016). Scientometric analysis and dimensions on international business literature. Scientometrics, 106(1), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1777-1

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks (2nd ed.). Sage Publications London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi.

Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. (2004). Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400088

Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.95

Child, J., & Tse, D. K. (2001). China’s Transition and its Implications for International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490935

Contractor, F. J. (1990). Contractual and cooperative forms of international business: Towards a unified theory of modal choice. MIR: Management International Review, 30(1), 31–54.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2018). The Evolution of Business Groups’ Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(4), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3912-4

D’Angelo, V., & Magnusson, M. (2021). A Bibliometric Map of Intellectual Communities in Frugal Innovation Literature. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2994043

Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional and Experience Influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(February), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199910)20:10<915::aid-smj51>3.0.co;2-0

DiMaggio, P. J. ., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(April), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Djankov, S., Porta, R. La, Lopez-de-Silane, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Courts: the Lex Mundi Project. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8890

Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija, M. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0074-z

Dou, H. (1994). In which business are we? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018112

Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2009). The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries 1. Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00367.x

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Eck, N. J. van, Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421

Eden, L. (2010). Editorial: Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: Lifting the veil on how institutions matter in IB research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.92

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Ferreira, M. P., Pinto, C. F., & Serra, F. R. (2014). The transaction costs theory in international business research: A bibliometric study over three decades. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1899–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1172-8

Garrido, I., Vasconcellos, S. L. de, Faccin, K., Monticelli, J. M., & Carpenedo, C. (2021). The moderating role of polycentric institutions in the relationship between effectuation/causation logics and corporate entrepreneur’s decision‐making processes. Global Strategy Journal, gsj.1419. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1419

Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299

Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x

Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2012). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. International Handbook on Informal Governance, 2(4), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001219.00011

Henisz, W., & Swaminathan, A. (2008). Institutions and international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 537–539. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400381

Hofstede, G. (1994). The business of international business is culture. International Business Review, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(94)90011-6

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2019). Comparing capitalisms and taking institutional context seriously. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0206-0

Kalasin, K., Cuervo‐Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R. (2019). State ownership and international expansion: The S‐curve relationship. Global Strategy Journal, February, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1339

Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Harvey, C. (2009). Journal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide. Management Decision, 47(9), 1441–1451. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910995648

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2004). Globalization and convergence in corporate governance: Evidence from Infosys and the Indian software industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 484–507. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400103

Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2015). Strategies that fi t emerging markets. In International Business Strategy (pp. 629–645). Routledge.

Kim, M. C., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Scientometrics of Scientometrics: Mapping Historical Footprint and Emerging Technologies in Scientometrics. In Scientometrics (pp. 9–27). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77951

Kingston, C., & Caballero, G. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409001283

Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.2307/259084

Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.

Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/259037

Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400265

Liesch, P. W., Welch, L. S., & Buckley, P. J. (2011). Risk and Uncertainty in Internationalisation and International Entrepreneurship Studies. Management International Review, 51(6), 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0107-y

López-Duarte, C., Vidal-Suárez, M. M., González-Díaz, B., & Reis, N. R. (2016). Understanding the Relevance of National Culture in International Business Research: A quantitative analysis. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1553–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2044-9

Mariani, M. M., Al-Sultan, K., & Massis, A. De. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955122

Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402

Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167

Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110997

Monticelli, J. M., Garrido, I. L., Curth, M., Vieira, L. M., & Dal-Soto, F. (2018). Institutional dysmorphia: When the institutions become ill. In International Journal of Emerging Markets (Vol. 13, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-03-2016-0057

Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2002). Institutions and internation business: A theoretical overview. International Business Review, 11(6), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00042-2

Muff, S., Rao, F., & Caflisch, A. (2005). Local modularity measure for network clusterizations. Physical Review E, 72(5), 056107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056107

Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113

North, D. C. (1971). Institutional Change and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 118–125. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117023

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. In Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. In Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Palacios-Núñez, G., Vélez-Cuartas, G., & Botero, J. D. (2018). Developmental tendencies in the academic field of intellectual property through the identification of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1561–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2648-3

Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040713

Peng, M. W. ., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479264

Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060220

Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377

Peng, M. W., Wang, J. C., Kathuria, N., Shen, J., & Eleazar, M. J. W. (2023). Toward an institution-based paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(2), 353–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09861-6

Pinho, J. C., & Prange, C. (2016). The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.001

Porta, R. La, Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.285

Rottig, D. (2016). Institutions and emerging markets: Effects and implications for multinational corporations. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-12-2015-0248

Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage Publications.

Serenko, A., Bontis, N., & Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the Proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996‐2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930910922860

Sirmon, D. G. D. G., Hitt, M. A. M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005

Skjølsvik, T., Pemer, F., & Løwendahl, B. R. (2017). Strategic management of professional service firms: Reviewing ABS journals and identifying key research themes. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(2), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox005

Sprong, N., Driessen, P. H., Hillebrand, B., & Molner, S. (2021). Market innovation: A literature review and new research directions. Journal of Business Research, 123(438), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.057

Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. http://amr.aom.org/content/20/3/571.short

Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). The Institutional Logics Perspective. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: an interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–22). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772

Waltman, L., Eck, N. J. van, & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002

Williamson, O. E. (1985a). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1496220

Williamson, O. E. (1985b). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. In The Economic Institutions of Capitalism Firms Markets Relational Contracting. Free Press.

Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411403532

Wu, D., Li, M., Zhu, X., Song, H., & Li, J. (2015). Ranking the research productivity of business and management institutions in Asia–Pacific region: empirical research in leading ABS journals. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1253–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1752-x