Sustainability and innovation in the pet industry: an analysis from the perspective of Ecological Modernization Theory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the sustainability and innovation of practices adopted by startups in the pet industry, from the perspective of the Ecological Modernization Theory (EMT). A multiple case study was conducted involving 25 Brazilian startups. Data collected from interviews with owners and managers of these organizations were evaluated through content analysis. The findings reveal that the practices of pet industry
startups are partially aligned with the EMT. There is a significant presence of digitization and innovations in processes and products, as well as initiatives focused on recycling, waste reduction, and conscious consumption. The absence of public policies and strict regulatory standards are the main identified barriers that hinder the adoption of a sustainable strategic vision. The study bridges the EMT with organizational reality, uncovers opportunities for collaboration in open innovation, and presents practical actions for advancing sustainability in organizations.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
References
Ahmed, S., & Cokinos, C. (2017). How does ecological modernization explain agriculture adaptation in coastal Bangladesh? A critical discussion. Environmental Hazards, 16(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2017.1279047
Albuquerque, A. R., Filho, Freire, M. M. A., De Luca, M. M. M., & Vasconcelos, A. C. de. (2020). Influência da Internacionalização e da Inovação na Competitividade Empresarial. Internext, 15(1), 01–18. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i1.521
Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Produtos para Animais de Estimação - ABINPET (2023a). Informações gerais do setor. https://abinpet.org.br/informacoes-gerais-do-setor/
Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Produtos para Animais de Estimação - ABINPET (2023b). Mercado PET Brasil 2023. https://abinpet.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/abinpet_folder_dados_mercado_2023_draft1_incompleto_web.pdf
Associação Brasileira de Startups – ABStartup. (2023). Mapeamento do Ecossistema Brasileiro de Startups. Recovered on Oct 23, 2023, from https://hub.abstartups.com.br/mapeamento-captacao
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. Edição 70.
Bugden, D. (2022). Technology, decoupling, and ecological crisis: examining ecological modernization theory through patent data. Environmental Sociology, 8(2), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.2021604
Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00044-5
Carolan, M. S. (2004). Ecological modernization theory: what about consumption?. Society and Natural Resources, 17(3), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0894120490270294
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2017). Environmental sustainability in the service industry of transportation and logistics service providers: Systematic literature review and research directions. Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment, 53, 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.032
Cillo, V., Petruzzelli, A. M., Ardito, L., & Del Giudice, M. (2019). Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1012-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1783
Elkington, J. (1994) Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746
Ewing, J. A. (2017). Hollow ecology: Ecological modernization theory and the death of nature. Journal of World-Systems Research, 23(1), 126-155. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2017.611
Horne, J., & Fichter, K. (2022). Growing for sustainability: Enablers for the growth of impact startups–A conceptual framework, taxonomy, and systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349, 131163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131163
Huber, J. (1986). La inocencia perdida de la ecología: las nuevas tecnologías y el desarrollo superindustrial. Editora Abril.
Julkovski, D. C., Sehnem, S., Bennet, D., & Leseure, M. (2021). Ecological Modernization Theory (TME): Antecedents and Sucessors. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v5i2.303
Kaufmann, L., & Denk, N. (2011). How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. Journal of supply chain management, 47(4), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03246.x
Kuzma, E., Padilha, L. S., Sehnem, S., Julkovski, D. J., & Roman, D. J. (2020). The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120745
Kuzma, E. L. (2022). Modelos de negócios de economia circular, inovação, recuperação de recursos e proposição de valor nos negócios: desenvolvimento e validação de uma escala de mensuração. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Chapecó, SC, Brasil.
Kuzma, E., & Sehnem, S. (2023). Proposition of a structural model for business value creation based on circular business models, innovation, and resource recovery in the pet industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 516-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3158
Lazzarotti, F., Roman, D., Sehnem, S., Bencke, F. F., & Sommer, A. T. (2019). Waste management from the perspective of circularity of materials. Environmental Quality Management, 29(2), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21660
Lopez-Torres, G. C., Montejano-García, S., Alvarez-Torres, F. J., & Perez-Ramos, M. D. J. (2022). Sustainability for competitiveness in firms–a systematic literature review. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(4), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-02-2021-0023
Mol, A. P. (2002). Ecological modernization and the global economy. Global environmental politics, 2(2), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1162/15263800260047844
Munck, L., & de Souza, R. B. (2010). Desenvolvimento sustentável ou modernização ecológica? Uma análise exploratória. Serviço social em revista, 12(2), 137-162. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-4842.2010v12n2p137
Murphy, J., & Gouldson, A. (2000). Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum, 31(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00042-1
Nawaz, W., & Koç. M. (2019). Exploring Organizational Sustainability: Themes, Functional Areas, and Best Practices. Sustainability, 11, 4307, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164307
Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Santos, J. (2016). An overview of the circular economy among SMEs in the Basque country: A multiple case study. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 9(5), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2065
Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: challenges and opportunities. Journal of cleaner production, 185, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4. ed. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing.
Oliveira, S. V. W. B. D., Leoneti, A., & Cezarino, L. O. (2019). Sustentabilidade: princípios e estratégias. Editora Manole.
Pal, P., Gopal, P. R. C., & Ramkumar, M. (2023). Impact of transportation on climate change: An ecological modernization theoretical perspective. Transport Policy, 130, 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.11.008
Parviainen, P.., Tihinen, M.., Kääriäinen, J.., & Teppola, S. (2022). Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5 (1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050104
Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
Saraceni, A. V. (2014). Ferramenta para avaliação da presença de práticas de simbiose industrial em uma rede de empresas (Master's thesis, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná).
Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S., & Bessant, J. (2012). Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Management, 42(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00678.x
Sehnem, S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Conceição, D. A. d., Weber, D., & Julkovski, D. J. (2021). The role of ecological modernization principles in advancing circular economy practices: lessons from the brewery sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 2786-2807. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2020-0364
Sehnem, S., Provensi, T., da Silva, T. H. H., & Pereira, S. C. F. (2022). Disruptive innovation and circularity in start‐ups: A path to sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1292-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2955
Sehnem, S., Troiani, L., Lara, A. C., Guerreiro Crizel, M., Carvalho, L., & Rodrigues, V. P. (2023). Sustainable fashion: challenges and barriers for advancing the circular economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03247-4
Silva, M., Theis, V., Schreiber, D., & Figueiro, P. S. (2020). Análise da percepção dos colaboradores quanto às práticas socioambientais em uma indústria pet food. Reunir Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 10(3), 86-95. https://reunir.revistas.ufcg.edu.br/index.php/uacc/article/view/1009
Spaargaren, G., & Van Vliet, B. (2000). Lifestyles, consumption and the environment: The ecological modernization of domestic consumption. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414512
Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory and domestic consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/714038564
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. (2015). Gestão da inovação. 5. ed. Bookman.
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329
Vos, R. O. (2007). Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental & Clean Technology, 82(4), 334-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1675
Weber, H., & Weber, M. (2020). When means of implementation meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A critical frame for thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals initiative. World Development, 136, 105129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105129
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e Métodos. 5 ed. Bookman.
Yin, S., Jia, F., Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2023). Circular economy practices and sustainable performance: A meta-analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106838
York, R., & Rosa, E. A. (2003). Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: Institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026603256299
Zanoni, B. L., & Oliveira, S. A. D. (2023). Reflexões sobre o sentido de sustentabilidade em organizações. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 63(2), e2022–0028. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020230203
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2012), Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: an ecological modernization perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.09.012