University entrepreneurship: The role of Technology Transfer Office Managers in the transformation towards an entrepreneurial culture

Main Article Content

Vivien Mariane Massaneiro Kaniak
Elizandra Severgnini
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-2511
Jéssica Cristina Ceni
Rivanda Meira Teixeira
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-6032

Abstract

Managers of University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) play a crucial role in disseminating entrepreneurial ecosystems and managing the innovation policies of higher education institutions (HEIs). This study aimed to examine the role of these managers in the transition from a traditional university model to a culture centered on entrepreneurship. This research employed a qualitative and descriptive approach, utilizing multiple case studies. Data collection was conducted with seven universities in Paraná, involving interviews with 36 managers associated with the institutions’ innovation agencies. The findings reveal two key points: (1) the
universities studied have either undergone or are currently undergoing a cultural shift toward an entrepreneurship-focused model, and (2) the role of innovation agency managers has been pivotal in challenging established paradigms and laying the groundwork for a culture of innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
KANIAK, Vivien Mariane Massaneiro; SEVERGNINI, Elizandra; CENI, Jéssica Cristina; TEIXEIRA, Rivanda Meira. University entrepreneurship: The role of Technology Transfer Office Managers in the transformation towards an entrepreneurial culture. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 65, n. 3, p. e2024–0146, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020250303. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/93041. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2026.
Section
Forum

References

Adriano, B. M., Ramos, F., & Cunha, C. J. C. A. (2018). Como pastorear gatos? Um estudo sobre o comportamento dos líderes universitários. In Anais do XLII EnANPAD, Curitiba, PR.

Almeida, D. R. de, & Cruz, A. D. A. da. (2010). O Brasil e a segunda revolução acadêmica. Interface da Educação, 1(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.26514/inter.v1i1.648

Arbix, G., & Consoni, F. (2011). Inovar para transformar a universidade brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 26(77), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092011000300016

Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo (3ª ed.). Edições 70.

Barreto, L. M. T., Kishore, A., Reis, G. G., Baptista, L. L., & Medeiros, C. A. F. (2013). Cultura organizacional e liderança: Uma relação possível?. Revista de Administração, 48(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1072

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Begeç, S., & Akyuz, G. A. (2023). Requisitos de liderança colaborativa e transformacional em ecossistemas digitais: Líderes tecno-orquestradores em um mundo VUCA. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 63(5), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020230505

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295

Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re‐appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x

Chang, Y. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Chen, C. W. (2017). Transformational leadership and corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-level mediation moderation evidence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(6), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2015-0219

Clark, B. (2005) The Character of the Entrepreneurial University. International Higher Education, 38(1), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2005.38.7456

Costa, A. D., Pilatti, L. A., & Santos, C. B. (2021). Inovação, desenvolvimento e transferência de tecnologia em universidade clássica e tecnológica: Comparação entre UFABC e UTFPR. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), 26, 347-376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772021000200002

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Artmed.

Desidério, P. H. M., & Zilber, M. A. (2014). Barreiras no processo de transferência tecnológica entre agências de inovação e empresas: Observações em universidades públicas e privadas. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 14(2), 101-126. http://revistagt.fpl.edu.br/

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888

Elmuti, D., Abebe, M., & Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620510574504

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0303

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J. M. C. De, & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011

Ferreira, J. J., Fayolle, A., Ratten, V., & Raposo, M. (Eds.). (2018). Entrepreneurial universities. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Freitas, I. Z., & Lagos, S. M. S. (2019). Núcleos de inovação tecnológica (NITS) em instituições de ciência e tecnologia: O estado da arte no Brasil. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 13(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v13i3.28211

Fujino, A.; Stal, E. (2007) Gestão da propriedade intelectual na universidade pública brasileira: diretrizes para licenciamento e comercialização. Revista de Negócios, 12(1), 140-210. https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2007v12n1p104-120

Garnica, L. A., & Torkomian, A. L. V. (2009). Gestão de tecnologia em universidades: Uma análise do patenteamento e dos fatores de dificuldade e de apoio à transferência de tecnologia no Estado de São Paulo. Gestão da Produção, 16(4), 624-638. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2009000400011

Godoi, C. K., Bandeira-de-Melo, R., & Silva, A. B. da. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: Paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. Saraiva.

Guerrero, M., Heaton, S., & Urbano, D. (2020). Building universities’ intrapreneurial capabilities in the digital era: The role and impacts of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Technovation 99(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102139

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Organ, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 415-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9287-2

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4

Harper-Anderson, E. (2018). Intersections of partnership and leadership in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Comparing three US regions. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242418763727

Hayter, C. S., & Cahoy, D. R. (2016). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 12-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016680564

Heaton, S., Lewin, D., & Teece, D. (2019). Managing campus entrepreneurship: Dynamic capabilities and university leadership. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(6), 1126-1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015

Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X

Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.002

Katz, I. S. S., Prado, F. O. do, & Souza, M. A. de. (2018). Processo de implantação e estruturação do Núcleo de Inovação Tecnológica. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 18(1), 225-251. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2018.v18i1.1112

Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(3), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.220

Kliewe, T., Kesting, T., Plewa, C., & Baaken, T. (2019). Developing engaged and entrepreneurial universities: Theories, concepts and empirical findings. Springer.

Lei n. 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. (2004). Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências.

Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0022

Ling, Y. A. N., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32626023

Machado, H. P. V., & Sartori, R. (2015). Uma análise sobre a institucionalização dos núcleos de inovação tecnológica no Brasil. In XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão de Tecnologia, Porto Alegre, RS.

Marco Legal da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. (2016). Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3a ed.). Sage Publications.

Miller, D., & Ács, Z. (2017). The campus as entrepreneurial ecosystem: The University of Chicago. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9868-4

Moraes, G. H. S. M. D., Fischer, B. B., Campos, M. L., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2020). University ecosystems and the commitment of faculty members to support entrepreneurial activity. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 17(2), Article e190091. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807

Moraes, G. H. S. M. D., Spers, E. E., Mendes, L., & Silva, H. M. R. D. (2023). Corporate entrepreneurship at the university: The influence of managerial support, autonomy and reward on the innovative behavior of university professors. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(2), 404-424. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2021-0287

Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods (3a ed.). Pearson.

Oliveira, A. B. de, Jr., Borini, F. M., Bernardes, R. C., & Oliveira, M. J. de. (2016). Impacto da orientação empreendedora nas alianças estratégicas e a influência da alta administração. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(3), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020160305

Pabis, T. Jr., Ribeiro, G., & Steindel, M. (2023). Da implantação do núcleo de inovação tecnológica às estratégias da gestão da propriedade intelectual: Um estudo de caso na Agência de Inovação do Instituto Federal do Paraná. Cadernos de Prospecção, 16(3), 553-569. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i3.50229

Rosa, R. A., & Frega, J. R. (2017). Intervenientes do processo de transferência tecnológica em uma universidade pública. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 21(4), 435-457. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160097

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.

Schweitzer, J. (2014). Leadership and innovation capability development in strategic alliances. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(5), 442-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-12-0001

Siegel, D. S., & Leih, S. (2018). Strategic management theory and universities: An overview of the Special Issue. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017750776

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and

Technology Management, 21(1/2), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-2

Singh, A. S., Kaniak, V. M. M., & Segatto, A. P. (2020). Desafios enfrentados pelos Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica (NITs) no Sul do Brasil e suas estratégias de superação: Um estudo multicasos. REA - Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 19(1), 165-187. http://periodicos.unifacef.com.br/rea/article/view/1677/1483

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J. (2018). Managing the university: Why “organized anarchy” is unacceptable in the age of massive open online courses. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017732760

Torkomian, A. L. V. (2009). Panorama dos Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica no Brasil. In Transferência de tecnologia: Estratégias para estruturação e gestão dos Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica. 1a. Edição. Komedi (pp. 21-37).

Vasconcelos, I. F. F. G. D., Irigaray, H. A. R., Leal, F. B., & Carvalho, L. A. D. (2019). Inovação tecnológica radical e mudança organizacional: A institucionalização de organizações resilientes e formas de trabalho mais substantivas. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17(4), 895-922. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190144

Walsh, G. S., Cunningham, J. A., Mordue, T., McLeay, F., O’Kane, C., & Connolly, N. (2021). What business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 988-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896805

Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2018). Qualitative analysis using NVivo. Taylor & Francis.

Yin, R. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6a ed.). Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.

Yusof, M., & Jain, K. K. (2010). Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: A literature survey. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0072-x

Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141