ESG, innovation, and financial performance: a systematic literature review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to insvestigate the characteristics of theoretical-empirical models described in the scientific literature concerning the relationships among ESG aspects, innovation, and financial performance.
Design/methodology/approach – Following the PRISMA protocol and the Methodi Ordinatio, and using a structured framework applied to 52 scientific journal articles. The authors map the main relationships across these constructs and show how institutional, sectoral and methodological factors shape their interactions.
Findings – The authors find that innovation frequently strengthens the positive influence of ESG practices on financial performance, whereas country-level institutional factors moderate these effects.
Research limitations/implications – The theoretical-empirical model was developed based on a reality that may differ significantly from those in other regions. Considering the importance of institutional context in empirical outcomes, future studies should aim to construct article portfolios for SLRs focused on specific contexts. This would enable exploration of ESG-INNOV-FP relationships while accounting for country-specific factors.
Practical implications – The findings encourage future research that broadens geographic diversity and adopts more robust analytical techniques.
Social implications – The authors generate social impact by clarifying how ESG-driven innovation supports the Sustainable Development Goals and by highlighting the underrepresentation of Global South contexts.
Originality/value – The authors advance theory by integrating bidirectional and mediating mechanisms into a theoretical-empirical model informed by the frequency of results, offering a more comprehensive explanation of how ESG and innovation co-evolve.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
References
Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. (2022). Corporate transformation toward industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121423, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021. 121423.
Baek, S., & Lee, D. H. (2024). Can R&D investment be a key driver for sustainable development? Evidence from Korean industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 838-853.
Barros, V., Verga Matos, P., Miranda Sarmento, J., & Rino, P. (2023). High-tech firms: Dividend policy in a context of sustainability and technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122434, 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122434.
Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99-110, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014.
Buallay, A. (2022). Sustainability reporting in food industry: An innovative tool for enhancing financial performance. British Food Journal, 124(6), 1939-1958.
Canabal, A., & White, G. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267-284.
Chen, L., Khurram, M. U., Gao, Y., Abedin, M. Z., & Lucey, B. (2023). ESG disclosure and technological innovation capabilities of the Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101974, 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101974.
Cho, Y. (2022). ESG and firm performance: Focusing on the environmental strategy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13), 10.3390/su14137857.
Chouaibi, S., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Social and ethical practices and firm value: The moderating effect of green innovation: Evidence from international ESG data. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 442-465.
Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46-71.
Chung, Y. C. Y., Kunene, N., & Chang, H. -H. (2024). Renewable energy certificates and firm value: empirical evidence in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 184, 113870, 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113870, available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030142152300455X(Accessed to 11 March 2024).
Cupertino, S., Vitale, G., & Riccaboni, A. (2021). Sustainability and short-term profitability in the agri- food sector, a cross-sectional time-series investigation on global corporations. British Food Journal, 123(13), 317-336.
De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability, 12(13), 5317.
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In Buchanan, D. A., & Bryman, A. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671-689). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Doni, F., & Fiameni, M. (2024). Can innovation affect the relationship between environmental, social, and governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 546-574.
Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/05/the-performance-frontier- innovating-for-a-sustainable-strategy
Ed-Dafali, S., Adardour, Z., Derj, A., Bami, A., & Hussainey, K. (2024). A PRISMA-based systematic review on economic, social, and governance practices: Insights and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), bse.4069, 10.1002/bse.4069.
Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585-604.
Fahad, P., & Nidheesh, K. B. (2021). Determinants of CSR disclosure: An evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(1), 110-133.
Fatima, S., Tandon, P., & Singh, A. B. (2024). Current state and future directions of sustainability and innovation in finance: A bibliometric review. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15(5), 1591-1614.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Fu, L., Boehe, D., & Orlitzky, M. (2020). Are R&D-intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study. Research Policy, 49(8), 104082.
Ge, G., Xiao, X., Li, Z., & Dai, Q. (2022). Does ESG performance promote high-quality development of enterprises in China? The mediating role of innovation input. Sustainability, 14(7), 3843.
Guimarães, T., & Malaquias, R. (2023). Desempenho de fundos de ações considerando investimentos ESG, restrições financeiras e a pandemia COVID-19. Brazilian Business Review, 20(1), 18-37.
Hair, J. F., Jr, Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
Hasnaoui, A. (2025). ESG ratings and investment performance: Evidence from tech-heavy mutual funds. Review of Accounting and Finance, 24(1), 59-70.
Huang, D. Z.-X. (2022). Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: Valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance, 62(S1), 1983-2010, 10.1111/acfi.12849.
Isaksson, L. E., & Woodside, A. G. (2016). Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3285-3314.
Jin, X., & Lei, X. (2023). A study on the mechanism of ESG’s impact on corporate value under the concept of sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(11), 8442.
Jitmaneeroj, B. (2023). Prioritizing CSR components for value enhancement: Evidence from the financial industry in developed and emerging markets. Heliyon, 9(5), e16044.
Jung, M., Eom, M. T., & Yayla, A. (2023). Investigating the interaction effect between IT-enabled innovation and corporate social responsibility on firm performance. Information Systems Management, 40(1), 70-89.
Jung, Y. L., & Yoo, H. S. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance activities and firm performance: Global evidence and the moderating effect of market competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 2830-2839.
Kahiya, E. T. (2018). Five decades of research on export barriers: Review and future directions. International Business Review, 27(6), 1172-1188.
Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2008). Measuring eco-innovation (Vol. 17, p. 34). European Commission.
Khalil, M. A., & Nimmanunta, K. (2023). Conventional versus green investments: Advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(3), 1153-1180.
Khalil, M. A., Khalil, R., & Khalil, M. K. (2024). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) - augmented investments in innovation and firms’ value: A fixed-effects panel regression of Asian economies. China Finance Review International, 14(1), 76-102.
Khanchel, I., Lassoued, N., & Baccar, I. (2023). Sustainability and firm performance: The role of environmental, social and governance disclosure and green innovation. Management Decision, 61(9), 2720-2739.
Khaw, T. Y., Amran, A., & Teoh, A. P. (2024). Factors influencing ESG performance: A bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review, and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, 141430, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141430.
Kong, Y., Agyemang, A., Alessa, N., & Kongkuah, M. (2023). The moderating role of technological innovation on environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm value: Evidence from developing and least-developed countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14240, 10.3390/ su151914240.
Le, M.-H., Lu, W.-M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2023). The moderating effects of power distance on corporate social responsibility and multinational enterprises performance. Review of Managerial Science, 17(7), 2503-2533, 10.1007/s11846-022-00591-z.
Lee, M. S. (2023). The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry. Sustainable Development, 32(3), sd.2807, 10.1002/sd.2807.
Li, C., Ba, S., Ma, K., Xu, Y., Huang, W., & Huang, N. (2023). ESG rating events, financial investment behavior and corporate innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 372-387, 10.1016/j.eap. 2022.11.013.
Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663.
Liu, H., & Lyu, C. (2022). Can ESG ratings stimulate corporate green innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(19), 12516.
Liu, J., Lau, S., Liu, S. S., & Hu, Y. (2024). How firm’s commitment to ESG drives green and low- carbon transition: a longitudinal case study from hang lung properties. Sustainability, 16(2), 711.
Ma, A. K. F., & Chen, Y. (2023). Board attributes, ownership structure, and corporate social responsibility: evidence from A-share listed technological companies in China. Society and Business Review, 10.1108/SBR-08-2022-0225, available at: www.emerald.com/insight/content/ doi/10.1108/SBR-2022-full/html(Accessed to 11 March 2024).
Martiny, A., Taglialatela, J., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2024). Determinants of environmental social and governance (ESG) performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456, 142213, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142213.
Meles, A., Salerno, D., Sampagnaro, G., Verdoliva, V., & Zhang, J. (2023). The influence of green innovation on default risk: evidence from Europe. International Review of Economics & Finance, 84, 692-710, 10.1016/j.iref.2022.11.036.
Naseem, T., Shahzad, F., Asim, G. A., Rehman, I. U., & Nawaz, F. (2020). Corporate social responsibility engagement and firm performance in Asia pacific: The role of enterprise risk management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 501-513.
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341.
Oliveira, A. M., Magnani, V. M., Tortoli, J. P., Figari, A. K. P., & Ambrozini, M. A. (2019). The relationship between R&D expenses and the abnormal return in Brazilian firms. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 20(5), eRAMF190106.
Pagani, R. N. (2024). Revisão sistemática de literatura: Methodi ordinatio na era da IA generativa, Texto e Contexto.
Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi ordinatio: A proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2109-2135.
Pagani, R. N., Pedroso, B., Dos Santos, C. B., Picinin, C. T., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2022). Methodi ordinatio 2.0: Revisited under statistical estimation, and presenting FInder and RankIn. Quality & Quantity, 10.1007/s11135-022-01562-y.
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n160, 10.1136/bmj.n160.
Paridhi, Ritika (2025). Impact of ESG disclosures on corporate financial performance: An industry- specific analysis of Indian firms. Business Strategy & Development, 8(1), e70055.
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
Pinheiro, A. B., Panza, G. B., Berhorst, N. L., Toaldo, A. M. M., & Segatto, A. P. (2023). Exploring the relationship among ESG, innovation, and economic and financial performance: Evidence from the energy sector. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 10.1108/IJESM-02- 2023-0008.
Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2471-2489.
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899-1933.
Sun, Y., Xu, C., Ding, R., & Cao, Y. (2023). Does innovation in environmental, social, and governance disclosures pay off in China? An integrated reporting perspective. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(3), 600-613.
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: the mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906.
Tang, H. (2022). The effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost. Sustainability, 14(7), 3769.
Teplova, T., Sokolova, T., & Kissa, D. (2023). Revealing stock liquidity determinants by means of explainable AI: The role of ESG before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resources Policy, 86, 104253, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104253, available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0160791X22000471
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence- informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
United Nations. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world (pp. 58). United Nations.
Uyar, A., Abdelqader, M., & Kuzey, C. (2023). Liquidity and CSR: A chicken and egg story. Society and Business Review, 18(1), 124-151.
Veeravel, V., Sadharma, E. K. S., & Kamaiah, B. (2024). Do ESG disclosures lead to superior firm performance? A method of moments panel quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 741–754, 10.1002/csr.2598, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.2598(Accessed to 11 March 2024).
Xu, J., Liu, F., & Shang, Y. (2021). R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China. Kybernetes, 50(3), 737–756, 10.1108/K-12-2019-0793, available at: www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/K-12-2019-0793/full/html(Accessed to 5 March 2024).
Xie, X. et al. (2023). Does carbon neutrality commitment enhance firm value?. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 21(1), 49–83, 10.1080/14765284.2022.2161171, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14765284.2022.2161171(Accessed to 11 March 2024).
Yang, C., Zhu, C., & Albitar, K. (2024a). ESG ratings and green innovation: A U-shaped journey towards sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), bse.3692, 10. 1002/bse.3692.
Yang, P., Hao, X., Wang, L., Zhang, S., & Yang, L. (2024b). Moving toward sustainable development: The influence of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance. Kybernetes, 53(2), 669-687.
Yin, X.-N., Li, J.-P., & Su, C.-W. (2023). How does ESG performance affect stock returns? Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(5), 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16320.
Zhang, Q., Loh, L., & Wu, W. (2020). How do environmental, social and governance initiatives affect innovative performance for corporate sustainability? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8), 3380.
Zheng, J., Khurram, M. U., & Chen, L. (2022). Can green innovation affect ESG ratings and financial performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM listed companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14), 10.3390/su14148677.