Social engagement and mine closure: lessons from mining transition in Itabira
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to investigate the main components of an engagement and participation process in the context of mine closure and how they contribute to a sustainable territorial transition in the post-mining period in Itabira, Brazil.
Design/methodology/approach – Based on literature reviews, interviews and a focus group, this study identifies five analytical categories: information flow, engagement context, scope of engagement, type of engagement and social acceptance. Although consultation and communication initiatives exist, practices remain largely unilateral and weakly deliberative, generating uncertainty about socioeconomic impacts as ore reserves are depleted.
Findings – The authors argue that enduring participatory forums and strengthened local capacities are essential for anticipating impacts, reducing asymmetries, and stimulating alternative productive activities. These contributions are particularly relevant in the Global South to ensure a legacy in mining territories that promotes inequality reduction, social inclusion and local development, as envisaged in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 10 of the United Nations 2030 Agenda.
Research limitations/implications – Single case evidence and absence of Vale interviews limit broader analytical generalization.
Practical implications – Permanent multi-stakeholder forums can reduce asymmetries and guide mine closure decisions.
Social implications – Inclusive closure governance can reduce vulnerability and support equitable local development.
Originality/value – Integrates stakeholder engagement, social license to close, and transition governance debates.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
References
Alonzo, D., Tabelin, C. B., Dalona, I. M., Abril, J. M. V., Beltran, A., Orbecido, A., Villacorte-Tabelin, M., Resabal, V. J., Promentilla, M. A., Suelto, M., Brito-Parada, P. R., Plancherel, Y., Jungblut, A. D., Armstrong, R., Santos, A., Schofield, P. F., & Herrington, R. (2024). Working with the community for the rehabilitation of legacy mines: Approaches and lessons learned from the literature. Resources Policy, 98, 105351, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105351.
APEC. (2018). Mine closure checklist for governments. APEC Mining Task Force, APEC Secretariat, Singapore. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/Publications/2018/3/ Mine-Closure-Checklist-for-Governments/218_MTF_Mine-Closure_Checklist-for- Governments.pdf
Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, (33). Retrieved from: https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html
Bainton, N., & Holcombe, S. (2018). A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Resources Policy, 59, 468-478, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.08.020.
Bardin, L. (2020). Análise de conteúdo. Edição revista e actualizada, (4th ed.), Edições 70.
Barifouse, R. (2019). Mineração: Cidade onde Vale nasceu vive cercada por 33 vezes o volume de rejeitos de barragem que se rompeu em Brumadinho. BBC News Brasil. Retrieved from: https:// www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-47220855
Beckett, C., & Keeling, A. (2019). Rethinking remediation: Mine reclamation, environmental justice, and relations of care. Local Environment, 24(3), 216-230, 10.1080/13549839.2018.1557127.
Bowles, P., MacPhail, F., & Tetreault, D. (2019). Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (il)legitimacy at the San Xavier mine, Mexico. Resources Policy, 61, 157-165, 10. 1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.005.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547, 10.1188/14. ONF.545-547.
Cesare, P., & Maxwell, P. (2003). Mine closure legislation in Indonesia: The role of mineral industry involvement. Natural Resources Forum, 27(1), 42-52, 10.1111/1477-8947.00039.
Cole, M. J., & Broadhurst, J. L. (2020). Mapping and classification of mining host communities: A case study of South Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(3), 954-964, 10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.007.
Dare, M., Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 188-197, 10.1080/14615517. 2014.927108.
Edgett, R. (2002). Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(1), 1-26, 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1401_1.
Everingham, J. A., Rolfe, J., Lechner, A. M., Kinnear, S., & Akbar, D. (2018). A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs. Land Use Policy, 79, 397-406, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.038.
Fontoura, Y., Naves, F., Teodósio, A. D. S. D. S., & Gomes, M. V. P. (2019). “Da lama ao caos”: Reflexões sobre a crise ambiental e as relações estado-empresa-sociedade. Farol, 6(15), 17-41, 10.25113/farol.v6i15.5440.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066.
Fundação João Pinheiro. (2022). Perfil municipal: Índice mineiro de responsabilidade social. Retrieved from: https://imrs.fjp.mg.gov.br/consultas/
Godoy, A. S. (2010). Estudo de caso qualitativo. In Godoi, C. K., Bandeira-de-Melo, R., & da Silva, A. B. (Eds), Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: Paradigmas, estratégias e métodos, (2nd ed.), Saraiva, 115-146.
GTR. (2020). Towards zero harm: A compendium of papers, chapter VIII - Closure and reclamation. Retrieved from: https://globaltailingsreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ch-VIII-Closure- and-Reclamation.pdf
Guimarães, C. L., & Milanez, B. (2017). Mineração, impactos locais e os desafios da diversificação: Revisitando Itabira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 41, 215-236, 10.5380/dma.v41i0.49360.
Holcombe, S., Hall, R., & Keeling, A. (2025). Self-Determination in mine site transitions and mine closure governance across Indigenous nations. Journal of Political Ecology, 32(1), 1-14, 10. 2458/jpe.8604.
Holley, E. A., & Mitcham, C. (2016). The Pebble mine dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy, 47, 18-27, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002.
Hurst, B., Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. B. (2020). Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101931, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101931.
IBGE. (2022). IBGE Cidades: Itabira. Retrieved from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/itabira/ panorama
IBRAM. (2024). Guia de indicadores para planejamento do fechamento de mina. Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração. Retrieved from: https://ibram.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IBRAM_Guia- de-Indicadores-para-Planejamento-do-Fechamento-de-Mina_A4.pdf
ICMM. (2019). Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, (2nd ed.), ICMM. Retrieved from: https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/environment/mine-closure/integrated-mining-closure
International Organization for Standardization. (2021). Mine closure and reclamation planning - Part 2: Guidance, ISO 21795-2:2021. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/80426.html
Johnston, K. A. (2018). Toward a theory of social engagement. In Johnston, K. A.,& Taylor, M. (Eds), The handbook of communication engagement, Wiley, 17-32, 10.1002/ 9781119167600.ch2.
Keeling, A., Hall, R., & Holcombe, S. (2024). What is the experience with governance models that manage and engage diverse stakeholders through a closure transition? Research Directions: Mine Closure and Transitions, 1, e2, 10.1017/mcl.2023.2.
Kivinen, S., Vartiainen, K., & Kumpula, T. (2018). People and post-mining environments: PPGIS mapping of landscape values, knowledge needs, and future perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, 7(4), 151, 10.3390/land7040151.
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136-1196, 10.1177/00076503211066595.
Marais, L., van Rooyen, D., Nel, E., & Lenka, M. (2017). Responses to mine downscaling: Evidence from secondary cities in the South African Goldfields. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(1), 163-171, 10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.004.
Marconi, M. de A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2003). Fundamentos de metodologia científica, (5th ed.), Atlas.
Measham, T., Walker, J., Haslam McKenzie, F., Kirby, J., Williams, C., D’Urso, J., Littleboy, A., Samper, A., Rey, R., Maybee, B., Brereton, D., & Boggs, G. (2024). Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions. Resources Policy, 90, 104859, 10.1016/j. resourpol.2024.104859.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. (2018). Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671-677, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Moffat, K., & Louis, W. (2017). Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, 54, 137-146, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.09.007.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886, 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
Monosky, M., & Keeling, A. (2021). Planning for social and community-engaged closure: A comparison of mine closure plans from Canada’s territorial and provincial North. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111324, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111324.
Ndaguba, E., & Marais, L. (2024). A scientometric analysis of mine closure research. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 27787-27803, 10.1007/s10668-023- 03785-x.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13, 10.1177/ 1609406917733847.
Oliveira, M., & Freitas, H. M. R. de (2012). Focus group: Instrumentalizando o seu planejamento. In Silva A. B. da, Godoi C. K., & Bandeira-de-Mello R. (Eds), Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: Paradigmas, estratégias e métodos, (2nd ed.), Saraiva, 325-346.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th ed., Sage Publications.
Perdeli Demirkan, C., Smith, N. M., & Duzgun, S. (2022). A quantitative sustainability assessment for mine closure and repurposing alternatives in Colorado, USA. Resources, 11(7), 66, 10.3390/ resources11070066.
Pimenta, A. A. F., Demajorovic, J., Saraiva de Souza, M. T., de Carvalho Pedro, S., & Pisano, V. (2021). Social licence to operate model: Critical factors of social acceptance of mining in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, 74, 102237, 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102237.
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346-357, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002.
Raman, S., & Mohr, A. (2014). Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 224-233, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290, 10.1177/0162243904271724.
Sá-Silva, J. R., Almeida, C. D. de, & Guindani, J. F. (2009). Pesquisa documental: Pistas teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Brasileira de História & Ciências Sociais, 1(1), 1-15, 10.63595/rbhcs. v1i1.10351.
Unger, C. J., Everingham, J. A., & Bond, C. J. (2020). Transition or transformation: Shifting priorities and stakeholders in Australian mined land rehabilitation and closure. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 27(1), 84-113, 10.1080/14486563.2020.1719440.
Vale S.A. (2012). Vale: Nossa história, Vol. 1, Verso Brasil Editora.
Vale S.A. (2016). Memória da tecnologia da mineração em Itabira. Da hematita ao itabirito compacto, Gráfica Formato.
Vale S.A. (2020). Formulário 20-F: Relatório anual de acordo com a seção 13 ou 15(d) da Lei de Mercado de Capitais de 1934. Comissão de Valores Mobiliários Dos Estados Unidos.
Vale S.A. (2022). Formulário 20-F: Relatório anual de acordo com a seção 13 ou 15(d) da Lei de Mercado de Capitais de 1934, Comissão de Valores Mobiliários dos Estados Unidos.
Vale S.A. (2023). Vale mais: Balanço das nossas atividades em Itabira 2022, BH Press Comunicação.
Vivoda, V., Kemp, D., & Owen, J. (2019). Regulating the social aspects of mine closure in three Australian states. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 37(4), 405-424, 10.1080/ 02646811.2019.1608030.
Xavier, A. M. (2013). Socio-Economic mine closure (SEMC) framework: A comprehensive approach for addressing the socio-economic challenges of mine closure [Doctoral thesis, The University of British Columbia], 10.14288/1.0103387.
Xavier, A., Veiga, M., & van Zyl, D. (2015). Introduction and assessment of a socio-economic mine closure framework. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 5(1), 38-49, 10.5539/JMS. V5N1P38.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos, (5th ed.), Bookman Editora.
Zhao, F., Ma, Y., Xi, F., Yang, L., & Sun, J. (2020). Evaluating the sustainability of mine rehabilitation programs in China. Restoration Ecology, 28(5), 1061-1066, 10.1111/rec.13183.
Zvarivadza, T. (2018). Large scale miners – Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure. Resources Policy, 56, 87-94, 10.1016/j.resourpol. 2017.12.005.