Comment: cost-benefit analysis and the courts

Autores

  • Robert J. Jackson, Jr. Columbia Law School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v283.2024.91221

Palavras-chave:

Administrative law, Financial regulation, Cost-benefit analysis, Securities law, Courts

Resumo

The articles discussed here demonstrate the value of integrating administrative law, financial regulation, and securities law. Professor Coates analyzes the challenges of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in regulatory management, while Professor Cox highlights its impact on securities regulation. This commentary asserts that regardless of one's stance on CBA's role in financial regulation, courts should have minimal involvement in its assessment. Part II outlines why courts are unsuitable for assessing the costs and benefits of financial regulation. Part III explains why policymakers should limit the courts' role in shaping CBA. Part IV suggests legislative actions to restrict the courts' influence on CBA in financial regulation. Part V provides a conclusion.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Robert J. Jackson, Jr., Columbia Law School

Professor of Law and Co-Director, Ira M. Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership, Columbia Law School.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-08-02

Como Citar

Jackson, Jr., R. J. (2024). Comment: cost-benefit analysis and the courts. Revista De Direito Administrativo, 283(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v283.2024.91221

Edição

Seção

Artigos