Public transparency and the normative performance of CNJ

Abstract

THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO INFORMATION REFERRED TO IN THE ARTICLE 5TH, XIV, OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, RESULTS IN THE DUTIES OF ACTIVE AND PASSIVE PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. THROUGH A DEDUCTIVE METHOD OF APPROACH, THIS STUDY APPROACH THE PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUSTICE (CNJ) IN THE CONTEXT OF HIS NORMATIVE POWERS, IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT THE TRANSPARENCY IN THE JUDICIARY WITH THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION, SPECIALLY THE INTERNET. AT THE END, AFTER USING THE TECHNIQUES OF LITERATURE AND DOCUMENTS RESEARCH COMBINED TO THE COMPARATIVE PROCEDURE, EMPLOYED TO CONTRAST THE PROVISIONS BROUGHT BY CNJ RESOLUTIONS AND LAW NO. 12.527/11 – IAL, WE CONCLUDED THAT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CNJ AT THE THEMATIC RESEARCHED, IN THE CONTEXT OF INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY, IS POSITIVE IN SOME PLACES, LIKE PUBLICITY OF BUDGET EXECUTION, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATIONS, BUT INSUFFICIENT IN RELATION TO OTHERS, NOTABLY THE PASSIVE PUBLIC TRANSPARENCY.