Hate speech in docial networks: brazilian case law

Authors

  • Rosane Leal da Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
  • Andressa Nichel Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
  • Carlise Kolbe Borchardt Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
  • Anna Clara Lehmann Martins Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Keywords:

HATE SPEECH, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM, SOCIAL NETWORKS, INTERNET

Abstract

CONSIDERING THE GROWING POPULARIZATION OF VIRTUAL SOCIAL NETWORKS LIKE ORKUT, THE EASINESS TO SPREAD HARMFUL CONTENT IN THIS MEDIA, AND THE NEED OF LAW TO ADAPT ITSELF TO THE DEMANDS OF THE “INFORMATION AGE”, THE PRESENT PAPER AIMS TO ELUCIDATE WHETHER AND HOW THE BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDGES CASES INVOLVING HATE SPEECH PUBLISHED IN SOCIAL NETWORKS. IN ORDER TO FULFILL THIS OBJECTIVE, TWO APPROACHES HAVE BEEN USED: ONE QUANTITATIVE (SYSTEMIC GATHERING OF JURISPRUDENTIAL DATA IN THE TRIBUNALS’SITES, HAVING FOR FILTER THE WORD “ORKUT”) AND THE OTHER, QUALITATIVE (ANALYSIS OF RELEVANT CASE LAW). IN CONCLUSION, IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THE JUDICIARY IN BRAZIL, ALTHOUGH IT RECEIVES FEW COMPLAINTS ABOUT INTOLERANT DISCOURSES CONVEYED IN VIRTUAL NETWORK, IT IS POSITIONED SO AS TO PRIVILEGE THE DIGNITY OF PEOPLE INTERACTING IN CYBERSPACE

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andressa Nichel, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

  

Carlise Kolbe Borchardt, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

  

Published

2011-07-01

Issue

Section

Law and inequality in the XXI century