Communicative distortions in sustainability reports: an analysis based on Habermasian thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Sustainability reports are ways of expressing what organizations understand by sustainability. Critical perspectives have pointed to the possible manipulative use of reporting practices. Based on Jürgen Habermas’ thought, this research applies the notion of communicative distortion to analyze sustainability reports of 4 corporations listed in the ISE 2020 portfolio, scrutinizing distortions of 4 orders: truth, sincerity, legitimacy, and intelligibility. The results alert to the risk that the reports can instrumentalize the idea of sustainability, printing the corporate vision on it. This way of proceeding, dismissing mutual understanding, removes sustainability from the discursive (Habermasian) scope, draining it of meaning.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
Cadernos EBAPE.BR undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by Cadernos EBAPE.BR can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Alcântara, V. C., & Pereira, J., R. (2017). O locus da gestão social no contexto das inter-relações e tensões entre mundo-da-vida (lebenswelt) e sistema (system). Organizações & Sociedade, 24(82), 412-431.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2010). Teoria crítica e abordagens pós-modernas para estudos organizacionais. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Org.), Handbook de estudos organizacionais. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Antolín-López, R., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Montiel, I. (2016, novembro). Deconstructing corporate sustainability: a comparison of different stakeholder metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 5-17.
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo, SP: Edições 70.
Boiral, O. (2013) Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036-1071.
Cukier, W., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2003). The discourse of learning technology in Canada: understanding communication distortions and the implications or decision making. In E. H. Wynn, E. Whitley, M. Myers, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Global and organizational discourse about information technology. Boston, MA: Springer.
Cukier, W., Bauer, R., Middleton, C., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analyses. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 175-196.
Cukier, W., Gagnon, S., Roach, E., Elmi, M., Yap, M., & Rodrigues, S. (2016). Trade-offs and disappearing acts: shifting societal discourses of diversity in Canada over three decades. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(7), 1031-1064.
Energias de Portugal. (2020). Relatório de sustentabilidade 2019. Recuperado de https://www.edp.com/pt-pt/sustentabilidade/transparencia-e-reporte#relatorios
Feil, A., & Schreiber, A. D. (2017). Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: desvendando as sobreposições e alcances de seus significados. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14(3), 667-681.
Forester, J. (1994). Teoria crítica e análise organizacional. Plural, 1, 131-148.
Forester, J. (2003). On fieldwork in a habermasian way: critical ethnography and the extra-ordinary character of ordinary professional work. In M. Alvesson, & H. Wilmoot (Eds.), Studying management critically. London, UK: Sage Publications.
García-Marzá, D. (2005). Ética empresarial: del diálogo a la confianza. Madrid, España: Trotta.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). Foundations. Recuperado de https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx
Gomes, R. (2009). Análise e interpretação de dados na pesquisa qualitativa. In M. C. S. Minayo (Org.), Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Habermas, J. (2003). Consciência moral e agir comunicativo. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Tempo Brasileiro.
Habermas, J. (2004). Verdade e justificação: ensaios filosóficos. São Paulo, SP: Loyola.
Habermas, J. (2012a) Teoria do agir comunicativo: racionalidade da ação e racionalização social (Vol. 1). São Paulo, SP: Martins Fontes.
Habermas, J. (2012b) Teoria do agir comunicativo: sobre a crítica da razão funcionalista (Vol. 2). São Paulo, SP: Martins Fontes.
Habermas, J. (2014). Técnica e ciência como “ideologia”. São Paulo, SP: Fundação Editora Unesp.
Habermas, J. (2018). A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. São Paulo, SP: Fundação Editora Unesp.
Habermas, J. (2020). Facticidade e validade: contribuições para uma teoria discursiva do direito e da democracia. São Paulo, SP: Fundação Editora Unesp.
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38-52.
Jargão. (2021). Michaelis: moderno dicionário da língua portuguesa. São Paulo, SP: Melhoramentos. Recuperado de https://michaelis.uol.com.br/moderno-portugues/busca/portugues-brasileiro/jargão/
Landrum, N. E. (2017). Stages of corporate sustainability: integrating the strong sustainability worldview. Organization & Environment, 31(4), 287-313.
Light. (2020). Relatório anual 2019. Recuperado de http://ri.light.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorios/
Livesey, S. M., & Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? A study of the sustainability reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/ Shell. Organization and Environment, 15(3), 233-258.
Metáfora. (2021). Michaelis: moderno dicionário da língua portuguesa. São Paulo, SP: Melhoramentos. Recuperado de https://michaelis.uol.com.br/moderno-portugues/busca/portugues-brasileiro/metáfora/
Michelsen, G., Adombent, M, Martens, P., & Hauff, M. (2016). Sustainable development: background and context. In H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, & A. Wiek (Eds.), Sustainability science: an introduction. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Milne, M. J. (2005). Playing with magic lanterns: the New Zealand Business Council for sustainable development and corporate triple bottom line reporting (Accountancy Working Paper Series). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago. Recuperado de https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/1556/PLAYING_WITH_MMAGI_LANTERNS.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2012). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13-29.
Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: the journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801-839.
Natura. (2020). Relatório anual 2019. Recuperado de https://www.natura.com.br/relatorio-anual
Petrobras. (2020). Relatório de sustentabilidade 2019. Recuperado de https://sustentabilidade.petrobras.com.br/
Rego, A., Cunha, M. P., & Polónia, D. (2015). Corporate sustainability: a view from the top. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 133-157.
Schaltegger, S., Hansen, G. E., & Spitzeck, H. (2016). Corporate sustainability management. In H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen, & A. Wiek (Eds.), Sustainability science: an introduction. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Silva, S. S., Reis, R. P., & Amâncio, R. (2014). Conceitos atribuídos à sustentabilidade em organizações de diferentes setores. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 16(40), 90-103.
Tregidga, H., Milne, M. J., & Kearins, K. (2015). Ramping up resistance: corporate sustainable development and academic research. Business & Society, 57(2), 1-43.
Vizeu, F., & Cicmanec, E. R. (2013). A música que encanta, o discurso que aprisiona: a distorção comunicativa em uma loja de departamentos. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 11(1), 149-164.
Vizeu, F., & Matitz, Q. R. S. (2013). Organizational sacralization and discursive use of corporate mission statements. Brazilian Administration Review, 10(2), 176-194.
Vizeu, F., Meneghetti, F. K., & Seifert, R. E. (2012). Por uma crítica ao conceito de desenvolvimento sustentável. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 10(3), 569-583.