Sociological interpretations of decent work in the social and solidarity economy
Main Article Content
Abstract
This text presents the thematic issue that approaches the sociological interpretations of decent work in the social and solidarity sconomy. The first part presents different interpretative theoretical currents about work in modernity and contextualizes the concept of decent work launched by the International Labor Organization. Subsequently, the interface between the social and solidarity economy and decent work as a field of study is developed based on bibliometric research. The last part presents the articles that make up this issue of the journal.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cadernos EBAPE.BR undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by Cadernos EBAPE.BR can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.
References
Arendt, H. (2009). La condición humana. Paidós.
Bell, D. (1976). El advenimiento de la sociedad post-industrial: un intento de prognosis social. Alianza Editorial.
Castel, R. (2005). As metamorfoses da questão social: uma crônica do salário. Ed. Vozes.
Coraggio, J. L. (2015). Institutionalizing the social and solidarity economy in Latin America. social and solidarity economy: beyond the fringe. Zed Books/UNRISD.
Defourny, J. (2009). Empresa social. In A. Cattani, J.-L. Laville, L. I. Gaiger, & P. Hespanha (Orgs.), Dicionário internacional da outra economia (pp. 188-192). Almedina.
Habermas, J. (1983). Técnica e ciência como “ideologia”. Edições 70.
Moreno, A. S., & Chaves, R. (2006, noviembre). Balance y tendencia en la investigación sobre tercer sector no lucrativo. Especial referencia al caso español. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 56, 87-116. https://ciriec-revistaeconomia.es/wp-content/uploads/5604_Sajardo_y_Chaves.pdf
Offe, C. (1989). Trabalho como categoria fundamental? In C. Offe (Org.), Trabalho & sociedade: problemas estruturais e perspectivas para o futuro da sociedade do trabalho (Vol. 1, pp. 13-42). Tempo Brasileiro.
Oliveira, F. (2003). Crítica à razão dualista: o ornitorrinco. Boitempo Editorial.
Pochmann, M. (2008). O emprego no desenvolvimento da nação. Boitempo Editorial.
Prado, J. W., Alcântara, V. C., Carvalho, F. M., Vieira, K. C., Machado, L. K., & Tonelli, D. F. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968-2014). Scientometrics, 106(3), 1007-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6
Sabel, C. (1982). Work and politics: the division of labor in industry. Cambridge University Press.
Supiot, A. (2019). Para além do emprego: os caminhos de uma verdadeira reforma do direito do trabalho. Revista Direito das Relações Sociais e Trabalhistas, 4(3), 17-52. https://doi.org/10.26843/mestradodireito.v4i3.160
Touraine, A. (1971). A Sociedade Post-Industrial. Moraes.