The future of graduate programs in Business Administration: New choices and new models

Main Article Content

Moacir de Miranda Oliveira Junior

Abstract

The relevance and impact of universities causes frequent debate in the international context. Every congress and seminar has a panel to analyze evaluation indicators. The question that arises is: do we impact society? In 2017, the University of São Paulo (USP) implemented changes in its evaluation of units and lecturers. A Permanent Evaluation Committee (PEC) was created, with representatives of USP lecturers in the areas of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, along with representatives from the Biological and Health Sciences, and representatives from the Exact and Technological Sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, M. de M. The future of graduate programs in Business Administration: New choices and new models. RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas , [S. l.], v. 58, n. 1, p. 87–90, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020180107. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/73884. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2024.
Section
Perspectives

References

Alcadipani, R. (2017). Periódicos brasileiros em inglês: A mímica do publish or perish “global”. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(4), 405-411. doi:10.1590/s0034-759020170410

Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45(1), 43-70. doi:10.1023/A:1021225514599

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajanb, J. B. A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164-1176. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014

Economic and Social Research Center Council. (2017). What is impact? Recuperado de http://www.esrc.ac.uk/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/

Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198- 233. doi:10.1007/BF01097964

Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of the entrepreneurial science. New York, USA: Routledge.

Garbuio, M., Dong, A., Lin, N., Tschang, F., & Lovallo, D. (2017). Demystifying the genius of entrepreneurship: How design cognition can help create the next generation of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Learning and Education. Publicação eletrônica antecipada. doi:10.5465/amle.2016.0040.

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471

Huang, F. (2007). Internationalization of higher education in the developing and emerging countries: A focus on transnational higher education in Asia. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 421-432. doi:10.1177/1028315307303919

International Business Machines. (2017). Transform learning experiences with Watson: Personalized learning on a whole new level. Recuperado de https://www.ibm.com/watson/education

Lawler, E., Mohrman, A., Jr., Mohrman, S., Ledford, G., Jr., & Cummings, T. (1983). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Lexington Books.

McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7-22. doi:10.24059/olj.v16i4.239

Morgan, G. (2006). Imagens da organização. São Paulo, SP: Atlas. Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689-699. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011

Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 497-502.

Scimago Institutions Rankings World Report. (2017). Scimago institutions rankings. Recuperado de http://www.scimagoir.com/

Artigos mais lidos escritos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)