Organizing the Organizational Studies in Chile: Creation history of Minga Group
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article addresses the experience, history, and particularities after the process of shaping Minga, an academic group of Organizational Studies in Chile. Following a historical-narrative methodology, a biographical account of this group is built, in which its protagonists participate as researchers and authors of the process. To analyze this story, a decolonial view is adopted, simultaneously investigating the leadership styles and the knowledge network that this experience mobilizes, paralleling the tradition of the minga chilota. The results show how the question for Organizational Studies in Chile coincides with a process of epistemic detachment from the global north, through which the collective and shared leadership among its members is consolidated in Minga, as well as its functioning as an inter-organizational academic network. The conclusions cover some of the learnings that the history and conformation of this group offer for other groups with similar intentions in the field of Organizational Studies in Latin America.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
References
Alcadipani, R., Rafi-Khan, F., Gantman, E., & Nkomo, S. (2012). Southern voices in management and organization knowledge. Organization, 19(2), 131-143. doi: 10.1177/1350508411431910
Ascorra, P., Rivera-Aguilera, G., Mandiola, M., & Espejo, A. (2018). Editorial Sección Temática Estudios Organizacionales en Latinoamérica. Oportunidades, perspectivas y proyecciones. Psicoperspectivas, 17(3), 1-5. doi: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol17-Issue3-fulltext-1520
Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (2017). Interorganizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 520-540). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Busse, S., Ehses, C., & Zech, R. (2000). Collective research in autobiography as a method of the science of the subject. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
Coraiola, D., Foster, W., & Suddaby, R. (2015). Varieties of history in organization studies. In P. G. McLaren, A. J. Mills, & T. G. Weatherbee (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to management & organizational history (pp. 206-221). New York, USA: Routledge.
Coluccio, G., Adriasola, E., & Espejo, A. (2019, June). Untangling the role of personality in shared leadership emergence: A multilevel approach. EURAM Proceedings, Lisboa, Portugal.
Conger, J., & Pearce, C. (2003). A landscape of opportunities: Future research on shared leadership. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 285-303). Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications.
Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. (2001). Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100-120. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00046-8
Cullen-Lester, K., & Yammarino, F. (2016). Collective and network approaches to leadership: Special issue introduction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.001
Czarniawska, B. (2000). The uses of narrative in organization research. Norway, Göteborg: Gothenburg Research Institute.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London, UK: SAGE.
Dahlin, E. (2019). A network perspective of organizational innovation. Sociological Inquiry, 20(10), 1-27. doi: 10.1111/soin.12250
Daughters, A. (2016). Southern Chile's Archipelago of Chiloe: Shifting identities in a new economy. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 21(2), 317-335. doi: 10.1111/jlca.12199
Escobar, A. (2007). La invención del tercer mundo: Construcción y deconstrucción del desarrollo. Caracas, Venezuela: Fundación Editorial El Perro y la Rana.
Gabriel, Y., & Griffiths, D. (2004). Stories in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 114-126). London, UK: SAGE.
Gonzáles-Miranda, D. (2014). Los estudios organizacionales: Un campo de conocimiento comprensivo para el estudio de las organizaciones. Innovar, 24(54), 43-58. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46431
Giuliani, E. (2007). Toward an understanding of knowledge spillovers in industrial clusters. Applied Economics Letters, 14, 87-90. doi: 10.1080/13504850500425907
Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy?. Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9-35. doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930250103
Ibarra-Colado, E. (1991). Notas para el estudio de las organizaciones en América Latina a partir de la reflexión crítica de la teoría de la organización. In E. Ibarra y L. Montaño (Eds.), Ensayos críticos para el estudio de las organizaciones en México (pp. 27-66). Iztapalapa, México: UAM-Iztapalapa/Porrúa.
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463-488. doi: 10.1177/1350508406065851
Jones, O. (2000). Innovation management as a postmodern phenomenon: The outsourcing of pharmaceutical R&D. British Journal of Management, 11(4), 341-356. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00177
Lam, A. (2007). Knowledge networks and careers: Academic scientists in industry–university links. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 993-1016. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00696.x
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 609-632. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0133
Mandiola, M. (2010). Latin America’s critical management? A liberation genealogy. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 6(2), 162-176. doi: 10.1108/17422041011049978
Mandiola, M. (2013). Management education in Chile: From politics of pragmatism to (im)possibilities of resistance. Universitas Psychologica, 12(4), 1085-1098. doi:10.11144/Javeriana. UPSY12-4.meic
Musson, G. (2004). Life histories. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 34-44). London, UK: SAGE.
Powell, W. W., & Giannella, E. (2010). Collective invention and inventor networks. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 575-605). Oxford, UK: North-Holland.
Pugh, K., & Prusak, L. (2013). Designing effective knowledge networks, MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(1), 79-88.
Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In E. Lander (Ed.), La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 201-246). Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO.
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 167-188. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00112.x
Ríos, N., Toro, J. P., Pérez-Arrau, G., Mandiola, M., & Espejo, A. (2018). ¿Estudios organizacionales en Chile? Entre la parcelación, la ambigüedad y las racionalidades en disputa. Psicoperspectivas, 17(3), 1-14. doi: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas/vol17-issue3-fulltext-1294
Sanabria, M., Saavedra, J. J., & Smida, A. (2013). Los estudios organizacionales ('organization studies'): Fundamentos, evolución y estado actual del campo. Universidad del Rosario, Escuela de Administración.
Slater, F. (1987). Apuntes para el estudio de la reciprocidad en Chiloé. Revista Aisthesis, (20), 71-76.
Weersma, L. A., Fernandez, A. F. M., & Shintaku, M. (2019). Compartilhamento de conhecimento e cocriação: Um olhar a partir das práticas estratégicas da Revista Gestão em Análise (ReGeA). Ciência da Informação em Revista, 6(Esp), 1-16. doi: 10.21452/23580763.2019.6ne.1-16
Yammarino, F., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 382-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01467.x
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274
