Controvérsias como método para ANTi-história
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Nosso objetivo é construir uma proposta de método para os ANTi-historiadores, tomando a análise da
controvérsia como ponto de partida. Apesar do desenvolvimento teórico e metodológico da abordagem ANTi-história para o estudo do conhecimento do passado e a criação de sua história, há espaço para o desenvolvimento de um método com base na análise de controvérsias. Baseamos nossa proposta em algumas das suposições da ANTi-história (relacionalismo, princípio de simetria e multiplicidade) e
conceitos práticos (tradução e política de redes de atores). Além disso, recomendamos quatro critérios
que os pesquisadores devem usar na escolha de uma controvérsia para servir como ponto de partida
para a investigação. Por fim, apresentamos cinco etapas para colocar em ação a investigação do conhecimento do passado e a criação da história.
Downloads
Métricas
Detalhes do artigo
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Referências
Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-network theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17(4), 419-435. doi: 10.1177/1350508410364441.
Anderson, P. (1974). Lineages of the absolutist state. London, UK: New Left Books.
Bettin, C., & Mills, A. J. (2018). More than a feminist: ANTi-Historical reflections on Simone de Beauvoir. Management & Organizational History, 13(1), 65-85. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2018.1446835.
Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives. American Sociological Review, 36(1), 98-109. doi: 10.2307/2093510.
Booth, C., & Rowlinson, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: Prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5-30. doi: 10.2307/2093510.
Bothello, J., & Salles-Djelic, M.-L. (2018). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. Organization Studies, 39(1), 93-119. doi: 10.1177/0170840617693272.
Busse, R., & Warner, M. (2017). The legacy of the hawthorne experiments: A critical analysis of the 'Human Relations School of Thought'. History of Economic Ideas, 5(2), 91-114. Doi: 10.19272/201706102004.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, M. (1989). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 83-103). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London, UK: Sage.
Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., & Foster, W. M. (2017). Mnemonic capabilities: Collective memory as a dynamic capability, RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(3), 258-263. doi: 10.1590/s0034-759020170306.
Corrigan, L. T. (2016). Accounting practice and the historic turn: Performing budget histories. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 77-98. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2015.1115743.
Corrigan, L. T., & Mills, A. J. (2012). Men on board: Actor-network theory, feminism and gendering the past. Management & Organizational History, 7(3) 251-265. doi: 10.1177/1744935912444357.
Deal, N. M., Mills, A. J., & Helms Mills, J. (2018). Amodern and modern warfare in the making of a commercial airline. Management & Organizational History, 13(4), 373-396. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2018.1547647.
Durepos, G. (2015). ANTi-History: Toward amodern histories. In P. McLaren, A. J. Mills, & T. Weatherbee (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to management and organizational history (pp. 153-180). New York, USA: Routledge.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. (2012a). ANTi-History: Theorizing the past, history, and historiography in management and organizational studies. Charlotte, USA: Information Age Publishing.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2012b). Actor-network theory, ANTi-history and critical organizational historiography. Organization, 19(6), 703-721. doi: 10.1177/1350508411420196.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2017). ANTi-History, relationalism and the historic turn in management and organization studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(1), 53-67. doi: 10.1108/QROM-07-2016-1393.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2018). ANTi-History: An alternative approach to history. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. (pp. 431-449). California, USA: Sage.
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J., & Helms Mills, J. (2008). Tales in the manufacture of knowledge: Writing a company history of Pan American World Airways. Management & Organizational History, 3(1), 63-80. doi: 10.1177/1744935908090998.
Durepos, G., Mills, A. J., & Weatherbee, T. G. (2012). Theorizing the past: Realism, relativism, relationalism and the reassembly of Weber. Management & Organizational History, 7(3) 267-281. doi: 10.1177/1744935912444353.
Durepos, G., Shaffner, E. C., & Taylor, S. (2019). Developing critical organizational history: Context, practice and implications. Organization, online first, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1350508419883381.
Foster, J., Mills, A. J., & Weatherbee, T. (2014). History, field definition and management studies: The case of the New Deal, Journal of Management History, 20(2), 179-199. doi: 10.1108/JMH-02-2013-0011.
Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J., & Chandler, D. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59(8), 1176-1200. doi: 10.1080/00076791.2016.1224234.
Hartt, C., Mills, A. J., Helms Mills, J., & Corrigan, L. T. (2014). Sense-making and actor networks: The non-corporeal actant and the making of an Air Canada history. Management & Organizational History, 9(3), 288-304. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2014.920260.
Hassard, J. S. (2012). Rethinking the Hawthorne Studies: The Western Electric research in its social, political and historical context. Human Relations, 65(11), 1431-1461. doi: 10.1177/0018726712452168.
Heikkurinen, P., Clegg, S. R., Pinnington, A., Nicolopoulou, K., & Caraz, J. M. (2020). Managing the Anthropocene? Relational agency and planetary boundaries. Organization & Environment, online first. doi: 10.1177/1086026619881145.
Hinnebusch, B. J. (1997). Bubonic plague: A molecular genetic case history of the emergence of an infectious disease. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 75(9), 645-652. doi: 10.1007/s001090050148.
Hussenot, A. (2008). Between structuration and translation: An approach of ICT appropriation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(3), 335-347. doi: 10.1108/09534810810874813.
Hussenot, A. (2014). Analyzing organization through disagreements: The concept of managerial controversy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(3), 373-390. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-01-2012-0006.
Hussenot, A., & Missonier, S. (2010). A deeper understanding of evolution of the role of the object in organizational process: The concept of “mediation object”. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(3), 269-286. doi: 10.1108/09534811011049608.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. doi: 10.2307/2393638.
Kivijarvi, M., Mills, A. J., & Helms Mills, J. (2018). Performing Pan American Airways through coloniality: An ANTi-History approach to narratives and business history. Management & Organizational History, 14(1), 33-54. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2018.1465825.
Kuper, S. (2019, June 21). How Oxford university shaped Brexit: And Britain’s next prime minister. Financial Times, 18 September. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/85fc694c-9222-11e9-b7ea-60e35ef678d2
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London, UK: Verso.
Lanzara, G. F., & Patriotta, G. (2001). Technology and the courtroom: An inquiry into knowledge making in organization. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 943-971. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00267.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, USA: Havard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, USA: Princeton University
Press.
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. (pp. 111-134). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393. doi: 10.1007/BF01059830.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London, UK, New York, USA: Routledge.
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management
Review, 41(4), 609-632. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0133.
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2017). Organization theory in business and management history: Present status and future prospects. Business History Review, 91, 457-481. doi: 10.1017/S0007680517001027.
Mannevuo, M. (2018). The riddle of adaptation: Revisiting the Hawthorne studies. The Sociological Review, 66(6), 1242-1257. doi: 10.1177/0038026118755603.
Michaud, V. (2014). Mediating the paradoxes of organizational governance through numbers. Organization Studies, 35(1), 75-101. doi: 10.1177/0170840613495335.
Mills, A. J., & Durepos, G. (2010). ANTi-history. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Weibe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 26-29). California, USA: Sage.
Mills, A. J., Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Durepos, G. (2016). Revisiting the historic turn 10 years later: Current debates in management and organizational history – an introduction. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 67-76. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2016.1164927.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, USA: Duke UP.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50(1), 253-269.
Muldoon, J. (2017). The Hawthorne studies: An analysis of critical perspectives, 1936-1958. Journal of Management History, 23(1), 74-94. doi: 10.1108/JMH-09-2016-0052.
Myrick, K., Helms Mills, J., & Mills, A J. (2013). History-making and the Academy of Management: An ANTi-History perspective. Management & Organizational History, 8(4), 345-370. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2013.821662.
Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M., & Steele, C. W. J. (2016). History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emerging and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676-699. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0183.
Popper, K. (2014). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
Scott, P., Richards, E., & Martin, M. (1990). Captives of controversy the myth of the neutral social researcher in contemporary scientific controversies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(4), 474-494. doi: 10.1177/016224399001500406.
Secord, P., & Corrigan, L. T. (2017). ANTi-History and the entrepreneurial work of privateers. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 12(2), 94-110. doi: 10.1108/QROM-06-2016-1389.
Venturini, T. (2010a). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. doi: 10.1177/0963662509102694.
Venturini, T. (2010b). Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. doi: 10.1177/0963662510387558.
Venturini, T., Ricci, D., Mauri, M., Kimbell, L., & Meunier, A. (2015). Designing controversies and their publics, Design Issues, 31(3), 74-87. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00340.
Weatherbee, T. G., Durepos, G., Mills, A., & Helms Mills, J. (2012). Theorizing the past: Critical engagements. Management & Organizational History, 7(3), 193-202. doi: 10.1177/1744935912444358.
Yaneva, A. (2012). Mapping controversies in architecture. Manchester, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
