Adoção e difusão de tecnologias 4.0 baseadas na trajetória inovadora e na escala de operação: O Caso do Chile
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
São analisados os fatores que podem explicar a difusão de tecnologias 4.0 na economia chilena. Trabalhamos com empresas que podem ser classificadas como "fornecedores especializados" e "baseados na ciência" relevantes para o campo tecnológico analisado. São utilizados os dados da Décima Pesquisa Nacional de Inovação, realizada pelo Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2018). Uma análise fatorial confirmatória de segunda ordem é realizada para identificar as variáveis que melhor explicam a difusão. Utilizou-se o software Lisrel 8.8, realizando as estimativas com o método robusto de mínimos quadrados ponderados na diagonal (DWLS) devido ao trabalho com variáveis ordinais. Os principais resultados mostram a relevância de futuros projetos de inovação e o número de trabalhadores contratados por cada empresa para estimular a difusão tecnológica.
Downloads
Métricas
Detalhes do artigo
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Referências
Agostini, L., & Filippini, R. (2019). Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22, 406-421. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0030
Almeida, R., Fernandes, M., & Viollaz, M. (2020). Software adoption, employment composition, and the skill content of occupations in chilean firms. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(1), 169-185. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1546847
Arnold, C., Veile, J., & Voigt, K. (2018). What drives Industry 4.0 adoption? An examination of technological, organizational, and environmental determinants. International Association for Management of Technology. IAMOT 2018 Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www2.aston.ac.uk/aston-business-school/documents/IAMOT2018_paper_75.pdf
Berger, R. (2016). The Industrie 4.0 transition quantified. How the fourth industrial revolution is reshuffling the economic, social and industrial model. Think Act. Ronald Berger GMBH. Munich, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_industry_40_20160609.pdf
Bogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2016). The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: Patterns of innovation in manufacturing and service. Economía Política, 33(2), 153-180. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2579642
Botha, A. P. (2019). Innovating for market adoption in the fourth industrial revolution. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 187-198. doi: 10.7166/30-3-2238
Brambilla, I. (2018). Digital technology adoption and jobs: A model of firm heterogeneity. World Bank. Policy Research (Working Paper N. 8326). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3115833
Cabrera-Sanchez, J., & Villarejo-Ramos, A. (2019). Fatores que afetam a adoção de análises de big data em empresas. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59(6), 415-429. doi: 10.1590/s0034-759020190607
Chauhan, C., Singh, A., & Luthra, S. (2021). Barriers to industry 4.0 adoption and its performance implications: An empirical investigation of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124809
Chege, S., Wang, D., & Suntu, S., (2020). Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 26(2), 316-345. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2019.1573717
Dalenogarea, L., Benitez, G., & Ayala, F. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
Dean, M., & Spoehr, J. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and the future of manufacturing work in Australia: Challenges and opportunities. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 28(3), 166-181. doi: 10.1080/10301763.2018.1502644
Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901. Retrieved from http://www.ehu.eus/gip/publicaciones/articulos/2008/1.pdf
Escobedo, M., Hernández, J., Estabané, V., & Martínez, G. (2016, January/April). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: Características, fases, construcción, aplicaciones y resultados. Revista Ciencia & Trabajo, 18(55), 16-22. doi: 10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004
Fuente, H. De la, Rojas, J., & Leiva, V. (January, 2020). Econometric modeling of productivity and technical efficiency in the Chilean manufacturing industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 139, 105793. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.006
Gatica, F. (2018). Elementos explicativos de la innovación en la industria TIC en Chile. Revista Interciencia, 43(6), 434-440. Retrieved from https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/434-GATICA-43_5.pdf
Gatica, F. (2019). Innovaciones tecnológicas en las regiones de Chile: Similitudes y diferencias. Problemas del desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 50(198), 87-112. doi: 10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2019.198.67751
Gatica, F., & Ramos, M. (2020). Políticas públicas y redes para el desarrollo delas tecnologías 4.0 en Chile. Paakat: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 10(19), 1-28. doi: 10.32870/Pk.a10n19.475
Hair J., Andersen R., Tathan R., & Black W. (1999). Análisis multivariado (5a ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.488
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. doi: 10.21427/D7CF7R
Horváth, D., & Szabo, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119-132. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021
Ingaldi, M., & Ulewicz, R. (2020) Problems with the implementation of Industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustainability, 12, 217. doi:10.3390/su12010217
Instituto Nacional de Estadística –INE- (2018) Décima Encuesta de Innovación. Retrieved from http://www.economia.gob.cl/2018/02/22/decima-encuesta-de-innovacion-en-empresas-2015-2016.htm
Jöreskog, K. (1994). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 24, 297-310. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4355811
Kiraz, A., Canpolat, O., Özkurt, C., & Taşkın, H. (2020). Analysis of the factors affecting the Industry 4.0 tendency with the structural equation model and an application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106911
Lasi, Heiner., Fettke, P., Feld, T, Kemper, HG., Feld Th. Hoffmann M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering. Springer 6, 239–242. doi: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-Based manufacturing systems. Magefacturing Letter, 3, 18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
Lepore, D., Dubbini, S., & Micozzi, A. (February, 2021). Knowledge sharing opportunities for Industry 4.0 firms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 1-20 doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00750-9
Mazzucato, M. (2017). Sistemas de innovación: Cómo dejar de subsanar las fallas de mercado para comenzar a crear mercados. In M. Cimoli, M. Castillo, G. Porcile, & G. Stumpo (Eds.), Políticas industriales y tecnológicas en América Latina. Publicación de las Naciones Unidas-CEPAL LC/TS.2017/91. Retrieved from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/42363/S1700602_es.pdf?sequence=4
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
Ministerio de Economía. (2020). Informe general de resultados: Encuesta de acceso y uso de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación (TIC) en empresas. División Política Comercial e Industrial. Unidad de Estudios. Retrieved from https://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Informe-de-Resultados-Encuesta-TIC.pdf
Müller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(1), 247. doi: 10.3390/su10010247
Nedelkoska, L., & Quintini, G. (2018). Automation, skills use and training. OECD Social, Employment and Migration (Working Papers N. 202). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/2e2f4eea-en.pdf?expires=1563986573&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1404B9C255F4E04C3BF7D9AA0171756D
Newsom. (2018). Some clarifications and recommendations on fit indices. Psy 523/623 Structural Equation Modeling. Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/semclass/ho_fit.pdf
Nhamo, G., Nhemachena, C., & Nhamo, S. (2020). Using ICT indicators to measure readiness of countries to implement Industry 4.0 and the SDGs. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 22, 315-337. doi: 10.1007/s10018-019-00259-1
Prause, M., & Günther, C. (2019). Technology diffusion of Industry 4.0: an agent-based approach. Int. J. Computational Economics and Econometrics, 9(1/2), 29-48. doi: 10.1504/IJCEE.2019.097793
Reyes, P., Li, S., & Visich, J. (2016). Determinants of RFID adoption stage and perceived benefits. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 1. 801-812. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.051
Rojas-Córdova, C., Heredia-Rojas, B., & Ramírez-Correa, P. (2020). Predicting business innovation intention based on perceived barriers: A machine learning approach. Symmetry, 12(9), 1381. doi: 10.3390/sym12091381
Safrankova, J. M., Sikyr, M., & Skypalova, R. (2020). Innovations in workforce management: Challenges in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 85-94. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2020.2-06
Schwab, K. (2016). La cuarta revolución industrial. Foro Económico Mundial. Barcelona, España: Editorial Debate.
Tirole, J. (2017). La economía del bien común. ¿Qué ha sido de la búsqueda del bien común? ¿En qué medida la economía puede contribuir a su realización? Madrid, España: Editorial Taurus Pensamiento.
Ventura-León, J., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: Un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017, October). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755-782. doi: 10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
Vowles, N., Thirkell, P., & Sinha, A. (2011). Different determinants at different times: B2B adoption of a radical innovation. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1162-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.016
