Inovação e colaboração on-line na criação de software livre
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Os avanços das tecnologias de informação propiciaram a inovação centrada no utilizador de artefatos advindos da cultura cibernética. Esse advento do capitalismo provoca a emergência de abordagens que contemplam a produção coletiva e imaterial vigente em comunidades de softwares de código aberto. A partir de uma perspectiva pós-estruturalista, foram analisadas seis entrevistas, dois vídeos e uma lista de discussão on-line para apreciação do processo de construção do discurso hegemônico a partir das lógicas de equivalência, diferença e fantasia. Constatou-se que os discursos dos desenvolvedores simbolizam uma presença ainda por vir, com as demandas particulares diluídas numa cadeia equivalencial que abarca o maior número de reivindicações, e que existe um esforço para a criação de um processo incessante de geração de valor ao ultrapassarem as fronteiras da comunidade, articulando continuamente stakeholders para acessar recursos e gerar soluções conjuntas no processo de inovação.
Downloads
Métricas
Detalhes do artigo
A RAE compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- adota a licença Creative Commoms BY (CC-BY) em todos os textos que publica, exceto quando houver indicação de específicos detentores dos direitos autorais e patrimoniais;
- adota software de detecção de similaridades;
- adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Referências
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
Batabyal, A. A., & Beladi, H. (2019). The optimal provision of information and communication technologies in smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.013
Becker, G. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
Betzing, J. H., Kurtz, M., & Becker, J. (2020). Customer participation in virtual communities for local high streets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102025. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102025
Bretas, W. V., Morais, A. S. C., da Hora, H. R. M., & Azevedo Filho, E. T. (2019). Knowledge extraction on international markets from patent bases: A study on green patents. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(4), 698-705. doi: 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n4.a14
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
Cardoso, A., Boudreau, M. C., & Carvalho, J. A. (2019). Organizing collective action: Does information and communication technology matter? Information and Organization, 29(3), 100256. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100256
Castells, M. (2010). A sociedade em rede – A Era da Informação: Economia, Sociedade e Cultura (11a ed.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Paz e Terra.
Chan, K. W., & Li, S. Y. (2010). Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1033-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.009
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management, 44(3), 35-41. Recuperado de https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-era-of-open-innovation
Chesbrough, H. W., & Henry, W. (2006). Open business model: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cocco, G., Galvão, A. P., & Silva, G. (2003). Capitalismo cognitivo: Trabalho, redes e inovação. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: DP&A.
Cornelio, G. S., & Cruz, E. G. (2014). Co-creation and participation as a means of innovation in new media: an analysis of creativity in the photographic field. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1-20. Recuperado de http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85737
Deligiaouri, A. (2019). Economic crisis and Greek crisis discourse: A discourse analysis of articles from The Economist referring to Greece (2009–2011). Journal of Language and Politics, 18(2), 231-251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17056.del
Dong, J. Q., Wu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The faster the better? Innovation speed and user interest in open source software. Information & Management, 56(5), 669-680. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2018.11.002
Eboli, L., & Dib, L. (2013). Criação coletiva na web 2.0: Um estudo de caso em uma empresa brasileira de crowdsourcing/Collective creation on the web 2.0: A crowdsourcing case study involving a brazilian company. Revista Electrônica de Sistemas de Informação, 12(3), 1-22. doi:10.5329/RESI.2013.1203001
Fernandes. N. C. M., & Silva, A. D. F. (2015, outubro). O discurso da inovação entre os empresários no desenvolvimento de produtos inovadores: Uma análise no setor de jogos eletrônicos do estado de Pernambuco. XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão Tecnológica (ALTEC), Porto Alegre, RS.
Fernandes, O. L. C., Fernandes, N. C. M., Paiva, F. G., Jr., Leão, A. M. S., & Costa, M. F. (2020). Symbolic consumption and representation of self: A study of interactions in a virtual community of Ubuntu-Br users. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17, 717-731. doi: org/10.1590/1679-395174446x
Fernandes, O. L. C., Fernandes, N. C. M., Paiva, F. G., Jr., & Melo, S. C. B. (2014). Um negócio da China: O discurso do guānxì nas articulações no âmbito organizacional. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 12(2), 253-269. doi: 10.1590/1679-395174446x
Friedman, M. (1953) The methodology of positive economics. In: M. Friedman, Essays in positive economics. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Glynos, J. (2008). Ideological fantasy at work. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(3), 275-296. Recuperado de http://repository.essex.ac.uk/13270/1/paper230708.pdf
Gorz, A. (2005). O imaterial: Conhecimento, valor e capital. São Paulo, SP: Annablume.
Heikkinen, I. T. S., Savina, H., Partanen, J., Seppälä, J., & Pearce, J. M. (2020). Towards national policy for open source hardware research: The case of Finland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119986
Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2009). Collective development in open-source communities: An activity theoretical perspective on successful online collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(9), 987-1008. doi:10.1177/0170840609339241
Howard, D., & Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
Iannacci, F. (2005). The social epistemology of open source software development: The Linux case study (Tese de Doutorado, University of London, UK).
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, USA: New York University Press.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45-63. Doi; doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0156
Karakilic, E. (2019). Rethinking intellectual property rights in the cognitive and digital age of capitalism: An autonomist Marxist reading. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.007
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Verso.
Laclau, E. On populist reason. New York: Verso. 2005.
Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14(6), 633-649. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866
Lee, W. S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2018). Effects of standardization on the evolution of information and communications technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.016
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin Press.
Lima, C. M., & Santini, R. M. (2008). Copyleft e licenças criativas de uso de informação na sociedade da informação. Ciência da Informação, 37(1), 121-128. Recuperado de https://ridi.ibict.br/bitstream/123456789/240/1/LIMACI2008.pdf
Liu, C. H. (2017). Creating competitive advantage: Linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.013
Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., & Bilro, R. G. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. Journal of Business Research, 119, 388-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.038
Nath, H. K., & Liu, L. (2017). Information and communications technology (ICT) and services trade. Information Economics and Policy, 41, 81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.06.003
Ortt, J. R., & Duin, P. A. (2008). The evolution of innovation management toward contextual innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 522-538. doi 10.1108/14601060810911147
Possas, M. L. (2008). Economia evolucionária neo-schumpeteriana: Elementos para uma integração micro-macrodinâmica. Estudos Avançados, 22(63), 281-305. doi: 10.1590/S0103-40142008000200021
Ruoslahti, H. (2020). Complexity in project co-creation of knowledge for innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.004
Shahrivar, S., Elahi, S., Hassanzadeh, A., & Montazer, G. (2018). A business model for commercial open source software: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 103, 202-214. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.06.018
Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives of innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17(1), 107-129. doi: 10.1177/017084069601700105
Stavrakakis, Y. (20045). Passions of identification: Discourse, identification. In D. Howard, & J. Torfing, Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Steiniger, S., Fuente, H. De La, Fuentes, C., Barton, J., & Muñoz, J. C. (2017). Building a geographic data repository for urban research with free software–learning from Observatorio. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 147. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w2-147-2017
Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2020). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26. doi: 0.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek (Vol. 301). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia: Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 654-663. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.007
Tutusaus, M., Schwartz, K., & Smit, S. (2018). The ambiguity of innovation drivers: The adoption of information and communication technologies by public water utilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.002
Wang, P., & Li, F. (2019). China’s organization and governance of innovation: A policy foresight perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 304-319. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.029
Zhang, H., Gupta, S., Sun, W., & Zou, Y. (2020). How social-media-enabled co-creation between customers and the firm drives business value? The perspective of organizational learning and social capital. Information & Management, 57(3). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.029
