Indústria, universidade e inovação: Entendendo a relação entre os canais de colaboração e a capacidade de inovação das empresas no Brasil

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Andrei Mikhailov
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1465-1958
Janaina Ruffoni
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7498-6437
Daniel Pedro Puffal
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-4676

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a influência de diferentes canais de colaboração universidade-empresa (U-E) por meio dos quais as empresas aprimoram suas capacidades de inovação. Uma pesquisa foi conduzida com 176 empresas brasileiras de manufatura. Os resultados indicam que, embora os canais de colaboração U-E sejam importantes para a construção de capacidades de inovação das empresas, nem todos são igualmente eficazes. Os canais de colaboração baseados na transferência de conhecimento são os mais benéficos para as empresas em termos de seu impacto nas capacidades de inovação, particularmente nas dimensões de gestão, transação e desenvolvimento, em comparação com aqueles baseados em redes de inovação. Isso significa que a transferência de conhecimento por meio de tecnologias licenciadas, treinamento, recrutamento de RH e publicações e relatórios permite que as empresas melhorem seus processos internos e, por sua vez, sua capacidade de inovação. Por fim, é importante destacar que este estudo esclarece as dinâmicas específicas da interação entre dois atores sociais fundamentais — universidades e empresas industriais — na geração e aplicação de conhecimento científico e tecnológico. Ao fazer isso, contribui para o debate mais amplo sobre o Objetivo de Desenvolvimento Sustentável 9 – Indústria, Inovação e Infraestrutura, particularmente no contexto de uma economia emergente.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
MIKHAILOV, Andrei; RUFFONI, Janaina; PUFFAL, Daniel Pedro. Indústria, universidade e inovação: Entendendo a relação entre os canais de colaboração e a capacidade de inovação das empresas no Brasil. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, [S. l.], v. 65, n. 3, p. e2024–0182, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-759020250310. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/93956. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2026.
Seção
Fórum

Referências

Abdulai, A. F., Murphy, L., & Thomas, B. (2020). University knowledge transfer and innovation performance in firms: The Ghanaian experience. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 2050023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500231

Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A., & Gilbert, N. (2011). A new model for university‐industry links in knowledge‐based economies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00793.x

Albuquerque, Eduardo, Suzigan, Wilson, Kruss, Glenda, & Lee, Keun. (Eds.). (2015). Developing national systems of innovation: University_Industry interactions in the global south. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Albuquerque, E. M. (1996). Sistema nacional de inovação no Brasil: Uma análise introdutória a partir de dados disponíveis sobre a ciência e a tecnologia. Revista de Economia Política, 16(3), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571996-0891

Alpkan, L., & Gemici, E. (2023). The relation between high-performance work systems and product innovativeness: The mediating role of technological capabilities and the moderating role of university-industry collaboration. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 67, 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101735

Alves, A. C., Barbieux, D., Reichert, F. M., Tello-Gamarra, J., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Innovation and dynamic capabilities of the firm: Defining an assessment model. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020170304

Apa, R., Marchi, V. De, Grandinetti, R., & Sedita, S. R. (2021). University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: The role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 961-988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09802-9

Arant, W., Fornahl, D., Grashof, N., Hesse, K., & Söllner, C. (2019). University-industry collaborations: The key to radical innovations? Review of Regional Research, 39(2), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-019-00133-3

Bishop, K., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from relations with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.009

Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university‐industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x

Caliari, T., Mendes, P. S., Rapini, M., & Tolentino, C. (2021). Technological cumulativeness and innovation in Brazilian manufacturing industry: Evidences from Brazilian innovation surveys 2008, 2011, and 2014. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 876-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00645-1

Castela, B. M., Ferreira, F. A., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. S. (2018). Assessing the innovation capability of small-and medium-sized enterprises using a non-parametric and integrative approach. Management Decision, 56(6), 1365-1383. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0156

Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. (2021). “Base de dados do Censo do Diretório de Grupos de Pesquisa no Brasil: Como os dados são obtidos.” http://lattes.cnpq.br/web/dgp/como-os-dados-sao-obtidos

Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 400, 0-19.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0

Cunha, N. C. V., & Madalena Fracasso, E. (1999). University‐enterprise interaction in biotechnology in the south of Brazil. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279910259411

Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Zawislak, P. A. (2019). New perspectives on university-industry relations: An analysis of the knowledge flow within two sectors and two countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(11), 1314-1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1612868

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

Engelman, R. M., Fracasso, E. M., Schmidt, S., & Zen, A. C. (2017). Intellectual capital, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Management Decision, 55(3), 474-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2016-0315

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.

Figueiredo, P. N., Cabral, B. P., & Silva, F. Q. (2021). Intricacies of firm-level innovation performance: An empirical analysis of latecomer process industries. Technovation, 105, 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102302

Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., & Vonortas, N. S. (2019). Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001

Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009

Fuentes, C. De, & Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666-1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026

Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Martin, D. P. (2017). Influence of university–firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.003

Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5

Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know‐how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360. https://sms.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5%3C339::AID-SMJ883%3E3.0.CO;2-7

Hogan, S. J., Soutar, G. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Sweeney, J. C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1264-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.002

Jones, J., & Zubielqui, G. C. de. (2017). Doing well by doing good: A study of university-industry interactions, innovativeness and firm performance in sustainability-oriented Australian SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.036

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427

Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009

Liboreiro, K. R., Corradi, A. A., & Rapini, M. S. (2022). The role of the university research laboratory in technology transfer to firms in Brazil: Two case studies in biotechnology. Industry and Higher Education, 36(4), 398-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221105366

Mikhailov, A., & Puffal, D. P. (2023). University-industry Collaboration and Innovation in Low-tech Industries: the Case of Brazil. Triple Helix, 10(3), 291-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000300006

Mikhailov, A., Puffal, D., & Santini, M. (2020). University-Industry relations and industrial innovation: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(3), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10042

Mikhailov, A., Ruffoni, J., Morales, G. L., Glaser, I. F., Puffal, D.P (2022). Características da hélice universidade-empresa no Brasil: Interações entre grupos de pesquisa das universidades e empresas industriais. In M. G. Amaral, A. A. C. Mineiro, & A. F. Faria, Interação universidade-empresa-governo-sociedade no Brasil (pp. 159-185). Editora CRV.

Min, J. W., Vonortas, N. S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Commercialization of transferred public technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.003

Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8

Póvoa, L. M. C., & Rapini, M. S. (2010). Technology transfer from universities and public research institutes to firms in Brazil: What is transferred and how the transfer is carried out. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496619

Puffal, D. P., Ruffoni, J., & Spricigo, G. (2021). Empirical evidence for Brazilian firms in terms of university–industry interaction, public funding, and innovation outcome. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 2150040. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500407

Rapini, M. S., Chiarini, T., & Bittencourt, P. F. (2015). University—Firm interactions in Brazil: Beyond human resources and training missions. Industry and Higher Education, 29(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0245

Reichert, F. M., Zawislak, P. A., & Arundel, A. (2016). Exploring innovation success recipes in low-technology firms using fuzzy-set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5437-5441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.151

Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.002

Santiago, C. V. S., & Lauriano, N. G. (2023). A reflection on the evolution of the Brazilian National Innovation System in twenty years. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 9(5), 2865-2885. https://doi.org/10.55905/ijsmtv9n5-015

Saunila, M. (2020). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002

Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139

Schaeffer, P. R., Dullius, A. C., Rodrigues, R. M., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Searching to bridge the gaps: A new typology of university-industry interaction. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 30(4), 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0148

Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research policy, 31(3), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1

Schneegans, S., Lewis, J. & Straza, T. (2021). Relatório de Ciências da UNESCO: A corrida contra o tempo por um desenvolvimento mais inteligente – Resumo executivo. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377250_por

Schultz, C., Gretsch, O., & Kock, A. (2021). The influence of shared R&D-project innovativeness perceptions on university-industry collaboration performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(4), 1144-1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09818-1

Suzigan, W. (2011). The underestimated role of universities for the Brazilian system of innovation. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 31, 03-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572011000100001

Suzigan, W., & Albuquerque, E. (2008). Interactions between firms and universities in Brazil: A historical perspective. Annals of Globelics, 22-26.

Vega-Jurado, J., Kask, S., & Manjarrés-Henriquez, L. (2017). University industry links and product innovation: Cooperate or contract? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 12(3), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242017000300001

Wu, Y., Welch, E. W., & Huang, W. L. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.004

Zawislak, P. A., Alves, A. C., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 14-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200002

Zawislak, P. A., & Dalmarco, G. (2011). The silent run: New issues and outcomes for university-industry relations in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(2), 66-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000200005