Os pequenos perfumes fazem grandes frascos? Os efeitos do tamanho no desempenho municipal

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Filipy Furtado Sell
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-4055
Leonardo Flach
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-0704
Luísa Karam de Mattos
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-3034

Resumo

Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo evidenciar os efeitos direto e indireto do tamanho no desempenho dos municípios de Santa Catarina, em razão da discussão acadêmica quanto ao tamanho do município afetar o desempenho deste. Analisaram-se todos os municípios do estado de Santa Catarina, no período de 2005 a 2016, compreendendo três períodos eleitorais. A amostra é de 3.504 observações, com 293 municípios, no período de 12 anos. A análise de dados em painel foi estimada por mínimos quadrados generalizados factíveis (MQGF). Observa-se nos resultados indícios de que o tamanho afeta de forma direta e positiva o desempenho municipal e de forma indireta quando associado com a escolaridade do prefeito. Assim, nos municípios catarinenses, quanto maior for a população, maior será o IPTU arrecado per capita. E quanto maior for o tamanho da população associado a prefeitos com maior grau de escolaridade, maior será o desempenho municipal. Quando o desempenho é medido pelo percentual do IPTU arrecadado da receita fiscal total, não há efeito do tamanho e do tamanho associado à capacidade do prefeito no desempenho.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Sell, F. F., Flach, L., & Mattos, L. K. de. (2021). Os pequenos perfumes fazem grandes frascos? Os efeitos do tamanho no desempenho municipal. Revista De Administração Pública, 55(2), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190223
Seção
Artigos

Referências

Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 574-595.

Anderson, K. (2003). What motivates municipal governments? Uncovering the institutional incentives for municipal governance of forest resources in Bolivia. Journal of Environment & Development, 12(1), 5-27.

Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Municipal performance: does mayoral quality matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 285-312.

Avellaneda, C. N. (2012). Do Politics or Mayors’ Demographics Matter for Municipal Revenue Expansion? Public Management Review, 14(8), 1061-1086.

Avellaneda, C. N., & Gomes, R. C. (2015). Is small beautiful? Testing the direct and nonlinear effects of size on municipal performance. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 137-149.

Avellaneda, C. N., & Gomes, R. C. (2017). Mayoral quality and municipal performance in Brazilian local governments. Organizações & Sociedade, 24(83), 555-579.

Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21-39.

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis London, UK: Heinemann Books.

Campbell, C. (1993). Public service and democratic accountability. In R. Chapman (Ed.), Ethics in Public Service (pp. 111-134). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

Carreirão, Y. S. (2006). Ideologia e partidos políticos: um estudo sobre coligações em Santa Catarina. Opinião Pública, 12(1), 136-163.

Christenson, J. A., & Sachs, C. E. (1980). The Impact of Government Size and Number of Administrative Units on the Capacity of Public Services. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 89-101.

Clingermayer, J. C., & Wood, B. D. (1995) Disentangling patterns of state debt financing. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 108-120.

Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of management studies, 46(4), 650-675.

Dean, G., & Peroff, K. (1977). The Spending-Service cliché: an empirical reevaluation. American Politics Research, 5(4), 501-516.

Doig, J. W., & Hargrove, E. C. (1990). Leadership and innovation: entrepreneurs in government Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Drew, J., Kortt, M. A., & Dollery, B. (2014). Economies of scale and local government expenditure: evidence from Australia. Administration & Society, 46(6), 632-653.

Durant, R., & Legge, J. S. (1993). Policy design, social regulation and theory building: lessons from the traffic safety policy arena. Political Research Quarterly, 46(1), 641-56.

Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel, SPSS e Stata Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Elsevier.

Flynn, N. (1993). Public Sector Management (2nd ed.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Fowler, W. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). School Size, Characteristics, and Outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 189-202.

Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. E. (2003). The local politics of decentralized environmental policy in Guatemala. Journal of Environment & Development, 12(1), 28-49.

Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner III, J. A. (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 462-481.

Grosskopf, S., & Yaisawarng, S. (1990). Economies of scope in the provision of local public services. National Tax Journal, 43(1), 61-74.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria básica(5. ed.). São Paulo, SP: McGraw Hill.

Heck, R. H., & Mayor, R. A. (1993). School characteristics, school academic indicators and student outcomes: Implications for policies to improve schools. Journal of Education Policy, 8(2), 143-154.

Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Holbrook, T. M., & Van Dunk, E. (1993). Electoral competition in the American states. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 955-962.

Holzer, M., & Fry, J., Charbonneau, E., Van Ryzin, G., Wang, T., … Burnash, E. (2009). Literature review and analysis related to optimal municipal size and efficiency Newark, NJ: Rutgers-Newark, School of Public Affairs and Administration.

Holzer, M., & Yang, K. (2004). Mapping the terrain of public service quality improvement: twenty-five years of trends and practices in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(3), 15-31. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309341330

Lapsley, I. (1999). Research in public sector accounting: an appraisal. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 21-33.

Lowi, T. (2009). Arenas of Power Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1996). Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

Marenco, A., Strohschoen, M. T. B., & Joner, W. (2017) Capacidade estatal, burocracia e tributação nos municípios brasileiros. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 25(64), 3-21. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987317256401

Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: the effect of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 629-643.

Pandey, S. K., & Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In: Boyne, G. A. et al. (Ed.). Public Service Performance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Parker, L. D., & Gould, G. (1999). Changing public sector accountability: critiquing new directions. Accounting Forum, 23(2), 109-135.

Peters, B. G., & Savoie, D. J. (1996). Managing incoherence: the coordination and empowerment conundrum. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 281-290.

Poi, B., & Wiggins, V. (2001). Testing for panel-level Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. StataCorp LP.

Roca-Puig, V., Beltrán-Martín, I., & Segarra Cipres, M. (2011). Combined effect of human capital, temporary employment and organizational size on firm performance. Personnel Review, 41(1), 4-22.

Romzek, B. S. (2000). Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 21-44.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2013). Metodología de la investigación México, DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

Sharkansky, I. (1967). Government expenditures and public services in the American states. American Political Science Review, 61(4), 1066-77.

Smith, K. B., & Meier, K. J. (1994). Politics, bureaucrats, and schools. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 551-58.

Stein, R. M. (1990). The budgetary effects of municipal service contracting: A principal-agent explanation. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 471-502.

Steiner, R. (2003). The causes, spread and effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland. Public Management Review, 5(4), 551-571.

Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .

Van Der Hoek, M. P. (2005). From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: The Dutch experience. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), 32-45.

Walker, R., Damanpour, F., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types on organizational performance: a longitudinal study of public services. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.

Whetten, D. A. (1978). Coping with incompatible expectations: an integrated view of role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 254-71.