Desenhando políticas e governança de dados para cidades inteligentes: ensaio teórico com o uso da IAD Framework para analisar políticas orientadas por dados
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Este artigo examina a política orientada por dados para cidades inteligentes e como o Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD) se posiciona como uma ferramenta para analisar o design da governança de dados e de política de dados. A pesquisa realizada neste artigo sobre políticas baseadas em dados parte da premissa de que um projeto orientado por dados sustenta iniciativas de cidades inteligentes e incorpora dilemas de ação coletiva, impactando diretamente o desenho da política e da governança de dados. A motivação do artigo foi examinar dos componentes da estrutura IAD e componentes constitutivos da política de dados que orientam sua governança em sistemas complexos de transformação digital. O artigo é um ensaio que pretende levantar discussões sobre dados em cidades inteligentes e como o desenho de políticas compreende os conflitos de ação coletiva motivados pelo controle de dados.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
A RAP compromete-se a contribuir com a proteção dos direitos intelectuais do autor. Nesse sentido:
- Adota a licença CC Attribution 4.0, que permite que os artigos sejam reutilizados e distribuídos sem restrição, desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado;
- Assegura os direitos morais e de uso do artigo a autores, conforme CC Attribution 4.0. Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais sob o artigo publicado e o periódico tem o direito de primeira publicação;
- Adota software de verificação de similaridade de conteúdo - plagiarismo (Crossref Similarity Check);
- Recomenda o uso dos critérios de autoria do CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy);
- Adota ações de combate ao plagio e má conduta ética, alinhada às diretrizes do Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE);
- A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar nas originais alterações apenas de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua e a padronização de layout, respeitando, contudo, o estilo dos autores. Posteriormente, os autores receberão as versões finais para aprovação antes da publicação.
Mais detalhes do Código de Ética adotado pela RAP podem ser visualizados em Normas Éticas e Código de Conduta.
Referências
Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019, dezembro). Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 424-438. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
Ada Lovelace Foundation. (2020, setembro 18). Exploring principles for data stewardship. Recuperado de https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/project/exploring-principles-for-data-stewardship/
Almeida, V., Filgueiras, F., & Gaetani, F. (2020). Digital governance and the tragedy of the commons. IEEE Internet Computing, 24(4), 41-46. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2020.2979639
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 1-17. Recuperado de http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/
Anthony, B., Jr. (2020). Managing digital transformation of smart cities through enterprise architecture – a review and research agenda. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(3), 299-331. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1812006
Arrow, K. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York. NY: Wiley.
Athey, S. (2017). Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems. Science, 355(6324), 483-485. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4321
Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2009). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 523-537. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909334430
Benfeldt, O., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2020). Data governance as a collective action problem. Information Systems Frontier, 22(1), 299-313. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z
Benjamin, R. (2019). Assessing risk, automating racism. Science, 366(6464), 421-422. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz3873
Blomquist, W., & DeLeon, P. (2011). The design and promise of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 1-6. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00402.x
Borkin, S. (2019, fevereiro). Platform cooperatives - Solving the capital conundrum. London, UK: Nesta and Co-operatives UK.
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamo, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927-952. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
Carney, P., Heikkila, T., & Wood, M. (2019). Making policy in a complex world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
Crain, M. (2018). The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society, 20(1), 88-104. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444816657096
Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 568-600. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975
Dawes, S. S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377-383. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001
Delacroix, S., & Lawrence, N. D. (2019). Bottom-up data trusts: Disturbing the ‘one size fits all’ approach to data governance. International Data Privacy Law, 9(4), 236-252. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz014
Drapalova, E., & Wegrich, K. (2020). Who governs 4.0? Varieties of smart cities. Public Management Review, 22(5), 668-686. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1718191
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philosophical Transactions of the Real Society, 371(1987), 1-17. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C., & Radaelli, C. M. (2019). A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(2), 163-180. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1575502
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Filgueiras, F. (2023). Big data, artificial intelligence, and the future of regulatory tools, in M. Howlett (Ed.), Routledge Handbook on Policy Tools. London, UK: Routledge.
Filgueiras, F., & Almeida, V. (2021). Governance for the digital world: Neither more state nor more market. London, UK: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Filgueiras, F., & Lui, L. (2022, abril 15). Design data governance in Brazil: An institutional analysis. Policy Design and Practice. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2065065
Filgueiras, F., Palotti, P. L. M., & Nascimento, M. I. B. (2022). Policy design e uso de evidências: o cao da Plataforma Gov.br. In N. M. Koga, P. L. M. Palotti, J. Mello, & M. M. S. Pinheiro (Orgs.), Políticas públicas e uso de evidências no Brasil: Conceitos, métodos, contextos e práticas. Brasília, DF: IPEA.
Frischmann, B. (2012). Infrastructure: The social value of shared resources. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Frischmann, B., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing the knowledge commons. In B. M. Frischmann, M. J. Madison, & K. J. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing knowledge commons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Frischmann, B., & Selinger, E. (2018). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50, 367-382. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T., & Nam, T. (2015). What make a city smart? Identifying core components and propose na integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61-87. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150354
Gitelman, L., & Jackson, V. (2013). Introduction. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), Raw data is an oxymoron. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Greenfield, A. (2006). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiqui-tous computing. Boston, MA: New Riders.
Grossman, R., Heath, A., Murphy, M., Patterson, M., & Wells, W. (2016). A case for data commons: Toward data science as a service. Computing in Science and Engineering, 18(5), 10-20. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2016.92
Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936-957. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Heikkila, T., & Andersson, K. (2018). Policy design and the added-value of the institutional analysis development framework. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 309-324. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230060131727
Hess, C., & Ostron, E. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hiller, J., & Blanke, J. M. (2016). Smart cities, big data, and the resilience of privacy. Hasting Law Journal, 68(2), 309-356.
Howlett, M. (2019). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. London, UK: Routledge.
Howlett, M., & Capano, G. (2020). The knows and unknows of policy instruments analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. Sage Open, 10(1), 1-13. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2014). Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57-71. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v2i2.149
Ilves, L. K., & Osimo, D. (2019, April). A roadmap for a fair data economy. Helsinki, Finland: Policy Brief, Sitra and the Lisbon Council.
Irion, K. (2012). Government cloud computing and national data sovereignty. Policy & Internet, 4(3-4), 40-71. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.10
Jeffares, S. (2021). The virtual public servant: Artificial intelligence and frontline work. London, UK: Palgrave.
Joyce, K., Smith-Doerr, L., Alegria, S., Bell, S., Cruz, T., Hoffman, S.G., … Shestakofsky, B. (2021, março 18). Toward a sociology of artificial intelligence: A call for research on inequalities and structural change. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121999581
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79, 1-14. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The Co-Evolution of Technology, Organizations, and Institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545-555. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001
March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2018). Barcelona: From corporate smart city to technological sovereignty. London, UK: Routledge.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1985). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
Mattioli, M. (2017). The data-pooling problem. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 32(1), 179-236. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/26488664
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London, UK: John Murray.
Meijer, A. J. (2018). Datapolis: A public governance perspective on “smart cities. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 195-206. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx017
Meijer, A. J., & Rodriguez-Bolivar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Mergel, I., Edelman, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Experts Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 1-16. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Micheli, M., Ponti, M. Craglia, M., & Suman, A. B. (2020). Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 1-15. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720948087
Mudliar, P., & Koontz, T. (2020). Locating power in Ostrom’s design principles: Watershed management in India and the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 34(5), 639-658. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1864535
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011a). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12º Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenge Time, New York, NY. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011b). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5º International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, New York, NY.
Nielsen, O. B. (2017). A comprehensive review of data governance literature (Selected Papers of the IRIS, n. 8). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010, junho). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/27871226
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7-27. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
Pereira, G. V., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Journal of Information Technology and Development, 23(3), 526-553. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Plotkin, D. (2013). Data stewardship: An actionable guide to effective data management and data governance. Burlington, NJ: Morgan Kauffman.
Polski, M. T, & Ostrom, E. (1999). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. In D. H. Cole & M. D. McGinnis (Eds.), Elinor Ostrom and Bloomington School of political economy (pp. 13-48). Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
Power, D. J. (2016). “Big Brother” can watch us”. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(1), 578-588. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187420
Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
Russell, S. J. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. New York, NY: Viking.
Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1-12. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
Sanfilippo, M. R., Frischmann, B., & Strandburg, K. J. (2021). Privacy and Knowledge Commons. In M. R. Sanfilippo, B. Frischmann, & K. J. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing privacy in knowledge commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schlager, E., & Cox, M. (2018). The IAD framework and the SES framework: An introduction and assessment of the Ostrom workshop frameworks. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 215-252). New York, NY: Westview Press.
Shackelford, S. (2020). Governing new frontiers in the information age: Toward a Cyber Peace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Souza, K. C., & Jacob, B. (2017). Big data in public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society, 49(7), 1043-1064. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555751
Tocqueville, A. (2002). Democracy in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Townsend, A. M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a New Utopia. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Veale, M., & Brass, I. (2019). Administration by algorithm? Public management meets public sector machine learning. In K. Yeung & M. Lodge (Eds.), Algorithm regulation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital tranformation: A reviews and research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Walravens, N., Ballon, P., Compernolle, M., & Borghys, K. (2021). Data ownership and open data: The potential for data-driven policy making. In G. Concilio, P. Pucci, L. Raes, & G. Mareels (Eds.), The data shake: Opportunities and obstacles for urban policy making. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Weber, K., Otto, B., & Oesterle, H. (2009). One size does not fit all. A contingency approach to data governance. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 1(1), 1-27. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1145/1515693.1515696
Williamson, B. (2014). Knowing public services: cross-sector intermediaries and algorithmic governance in public sector reform. Public Policy & Administration, 29(4), 292-312. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714529139.
Xu, C. K., & Tang, T. (2020). Closing the gap or widening the divide: The impacts of technology-enabled coproduction on equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 962-975. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13222