Evaluating public policies: a theoretical review of a field under construction
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article performs a theoretical recovery of the literature about public policy in general, and evaluation of public policy specifically. The theoretical and historical understanding of a given field of knowledge is essential for its practice, including a better understanding of its consequences, its trajectory, and perspectives. The article begins with a general overview about public policy, its origins, and conceptual dimensions. It then continues with a discussion about this theme in Brazil, taking into consideration mainly the more recent years. The evaluation of public policy is observed more deeply for it has received numerous definitions within the literature. Three main phases of evaluation are identified since the 1960s until the present date. Subsequently the article presents some methodologies concerning the evaluation of public policy, including its several classifications, timing, the evaluator¿s position, criteria and structure. Finally, it comments on the possibility of the application of meta-evaluations, as well as on the emergence of new issues that impose themselves into the participative-democratic Brazilian context.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Trevisan, A. P., & Bellen, H. M. V. (2008). Evaluating public policies: a theoretical review of a field under construction. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 529 a 550. Retrieved from https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6644
Issue
Section
Article
The Brazilian Journal of Public Administration (RAP) undertakes to contribute to the protection of authors’ intellectual rights. On this matter:
- It uses the Creative Commons BY (CC-BY) license for all texts it publishes, except when there is indication of specific holders of copyrights and property rights;
- It uses the similarity verification software of content - Plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check);
- It takes actions to fight against plagiarism and ethical misconduct aligned with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Further information on the Code of Ethics adopted by RAP can be found in Ethical Standards and Code of Conduct.